Screens
Incredible Secrets of the World's Largest Plasma TV
Posted by John Mahoney at 2:00 AM on October 2, 2008

Meet Dorothy. At 150 inches diagonal, she's the world's largest plasma screen and the biggest direct-view TV ever made, built (and named) by Panasonic. We got to play with her recently and as you've seen, it was mind-meltingly awesome. Even though firsthand experiences with Dorothy are akin to filling a leaf blower with nitrous oxide to jet-huff directly into your brain, Dorothy's backstory is almost as incredible, especially when it comes to manufacturing, shipping and yes, managing all the electricity needed to fire her up. So even though you will absolutely never own one--except for you Giz-reading NBA stars and platinum-selling rappers--the story of the world's most advanced television is a thrill, and serves as a crystal ball to the future of all TV. Come, talk to her. She's intimidating, but it'll be good for you.
Why "Dorothy"?
There are currently five 150-inch Panasonic plasmas in existence--and a sixth for CES 2009 is currently being assembled. They've been named, appropriately enough, like hurricanes--starting with A and working down. Dorothy's number 4, hence the D.
Why 150 inches?
It's all about the upper limits of the manufacturing process. Panel factories crank out the largest single piece of "mother glass" they possibly can, so that they can cut more large TVs per pane of manufactured glass. The ultimate size of a piece of mother glass is limited by the glass's strength and uniformity—how large the thing can get without cracking. Panel makers will always be pushing this boundary, because the more 50-inch TVs you can get out of each single assembly-line run, the more money you can make on them even if they're selling at lower prices in stores. 
Panasonic's previous biggest piece of mother glass was 103 inches (remember?), from which four 50-inch plasmas could be cut. Their new manufacturing plant, Amagasaki 5 in Japan, has pushed the max to 150 inches--enough glass to birth nine 50-inch plasmas. Dorothy's as big as she is because she literally swallowed nine TVs. When manufacturing evolves further, creating even larger panes of mother glass, you could see larger trade-show sets, provided they fit through the convention-centre doors.
103 inches, how quaint. And look at that lil' 42-incher, looking fit for bathroom viewing only by comparison.
What's the resolution?
Typically called 4K, it's resolution is 3996x2160. Even though you could technically call this 2160p, it's important to recognise that it's four times as tight as 1080p. Think four 1920x1080 panels Voltroning together to make something that's 8 megapixels, as opposed to the best current TVs' 2 megapixels. The annoying thing is that the industry went from measuring vertical resolution—720p and 1080p—to horizontal resolution—2K and 4K. (More on that here.)
As a result, watching a 1080p Blu-ray disc upscaled on Dorothy is akin to watching a standard-def DVD upscaled on your HDTV. As you can see in the shot below, the upscaler uses two pixels to render a one-pixel wide line from a test disc. But at Dorothy's scale, it's less about spotting compression artifacts, which are most visible when you're close enough to induce nausea anyway. It's about getting your face blown off. ![]()
How's it stack up to Pioneer's Kuro, one of the top plasmas in the game?
As far as motion-resolution goes--the all-important ability to maintain crisp images while they're in motion on the screen--it's actually better. According to HD Guru Gary Merson (who was more interested in running his calibration discs on the 150 than sticking with us for some Counter Strike, God bless 'im), the 150-incher, even as a prototype, scored a resolution of 920 lines on a 1080i signal. Pioneer's '08 Kuros, the next best, scored 900. Our bet is that Dorothy can't best the Kuro in the contrast department, but as you can see from all of our shots, it's no slouch. Check out more performance specs in Gary's 125-TV mega-guide. Below: Gary testing motion resolution.
How much power does she suck down, and at what cost?
Dorothy is addicted to raw electricity--we're talking two dedicated 15-amp, single-phase, 208-volt lines which produce around 3,000 watts on average. Dorothy peaks at around 7,000 watts of direct consumption. Not exactly EnergyStar.
If I plugged Dorothy in at my apartment (that is, after removing my second-floor balcony door and window and much of the exterior wall while at it, and hiring a crane to bring the TV in), Dorothy's juice habit would run me around $US1.50 per hour of use, at ConEd's current price of 22 cents per kilowatt-hour. So, after renting the Godfather Blu-ray set, factor in about $US15 more in electricity charges for watching the whole thing.
How much heat does the thing put off?
We were expecting getting close to Dorothy was going to feel like putting our faces in a toaster oven. Even standard-size Kuros can feel a little warm. But surprisingly, up front, the heat was far from extreme. It very well could be channeled out the back, but we didn't see any industrial-grade heat sinks behind her, either, or hear any fans blowing away. (Note: We're not allowed to show photographs of Dorothy's rear, though we did have a peek.)
How much does she weigh?
Around 770 kg not including the stand. For comparison, an actual Mini Cooper with Adam in the driver's seat weighs about 1,270 kg.
How does Dorothy get around?
With great care and difficulty. After her inception at Amagasaki 5, Dorothy and her sisters were tested then sent on the trade-show circuit. Unlike the 103, they're too big even for wooden crates. All that protects Dorothy and her sisters from the elements are the thin membranes of bubble wrap and Styrofoam wrapped around them, and the tarp draped over the open shipping cage. That's all. Here's a fun fact: Only two 150-inchers can fit in a single 747 cargo hold at a time. 
Although we saw a 150-incher at CES last January, Dorothy's first trip was to IFA in Berlin this September. Afterward, she headed for Panasonic's North American HQ in Secaucus, NJ where we got the chance to meet. She's due to appear on Wall Street today (unfortunate timing for the poor girl) for the official US debut, then on to trade shows in Dubai, Singapore and Hong Kong before returning home again to Japan.
Thanks for the facts, but what was that about a "mind-meltingly awesome" experience again? Any way to demonstrate that, say with a video of Gran Turismo 5's in-car view?
Why yes we can, and we'll throw in the 42-inch steering wheel for free:
There's more where that came from: check out more hands-on 150-inch action here and here.


Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
Jon B.
Posted 2:53 AM 2/10/08
@John Mahoney: I corrected myself, thanks though.
Jon B.
Kaiser-Machead
Posted 2:48 AM 2/10/08
@Chester_Copperpot: Indeed it will. Your retinas. With lots and lots of science.
Kaiser-Machead
reddingofish
Posted 2:48 AM 2/10/08
Fahrenheit 451 here we come.
reddingofish
Stang70Fastback
Posted 2:45 AM 2/10/08
SOOO... how big is a 747 cargo hold???
Stang70Fastback
dilpickies
Posted 2:41 AM 2/10/08
So what exactly are the dimensions on this thing? My math places it around 8 feet wide and 5 feet high.
dilpickies
Chester_Copperpot
Posted 2:40 AM 2/10/08
Ugh, I hate to have to be the one to say....will it blend...sorry.
Chester_Copperpot
John Mahoney
Posted 2:39 AM 2/10/08
@Jon B.: It's 4K, not 1080p.
John Mahoney
EVEs_Mako
Posted 2:38 AM 2/10/08
Ok, Giz, back away from the TV....
..and tell us what else happened in the world I gadgets. We miss you.
(7000 watts of power, holy fook)
EVEs_Mako
Jon B.
Posted 2:38 AM 2/10/08
@Jon B.: wait, I'm sorry, no its not, I didn't read close enough
My apologies.
Jon B.
Jon B.
Posted 2:36 AM 2/10/08
Wow, thats amazing.
Only problem is that its max resolution is only 1080p...
...yes, I said 'only'.
A TV that big has to show jaggies unless AA is at like.... x64 or something o.o
Jon B.
J0hnP
Posted 2:34 AM 2/10/08
Thanks, Giz, for the logistical information. It sure looks like a bear to move around, hook up to power, etc.
But, once established, mmmm...!
J0hnP
J0hnP
Posted 2:33 AM 2/10/08
Loved the logistical information on this set. I'm sure it's a bear to move around, hook up to power, etc.
But, once established, mmmm...!
J0hnP
mpar
Posted 2:29 AM 2/10/08
Wow all of this its just amazing!
thank you Giz for Showing me on detail something that I will never ever ever going to have
... I can't see the video
mpar
alowishus
Posted 3:25 AM 2/10/08
What kind of 4K material did they have? Must've been, well, mind-blowing.
alowishus
Guapo
Posted 3:16 AM 2/10/08
Does it respond to the original TV-B-Gone, or do you need an extra large version of TV-B-Gone?
Guapo
daftrok
Posted 3:05 AM 2/10/08
They need to make an "energy efficient" 150" LED TV that only sips 1000 watts at peak power! Only $1,000,000! 4K RESOLUTION! BUY ONE GET THE SECOND ONE 1/2 OFF! CALL NOW!
daftrok
nubbinator
Posted 3:03 AM 2/10/08
@Chester_Copperpot: I hated that you said that, too.
nubbinator
scarbrtj
Posted 3:02 AM 2/10/08
Something tells me we're not in Kansas anymore.
scarbrtj
mrpedenman
Posted 3:02 AM 2/10/08
Oh man I would love to kick your ass in Grand Turismo 5!!
mrpedenman
Nintenboy01
Posted 3:44 AM 2/10/08
Darn, you guys should have hooked the Wii up to this. I would have loved to see how Metroid Prime 3 in measly 480p looks on this behemoth.
Nintenboy01
MrBlahBlah
Posted 3:37 AM 2/10/08
yes indeed you can't drive! that was awful!
MrBlahBlah
zanella
Posted 3:35 AM 2/10/08
I can has one to tezt in my houz?
zanella
Adam
Posted 3:32 AM 2/10/08
Eh... front projectors ftw.
Sure, you can't put your face in front of it, but they are just as big, and much cheaper!
Adam
TorkLugnutz
Posted 3:30 AM 2/10/08
Going bigger will be a challenge in terms of transport. The doors of convention centers are huge, but the size of jumbo jet cargo planes is relatively small. At last year's CES, Panasonic said the crated 150" beast barely fit.
I don't think it's enough of a reason to build a manufacturing plant in America, but a 240" TV would be a hell of an inauguration.
TorkLugnutz
alowishus
Posted 3:29 AM 2/10/08
@alowishus: Oh, and how did they play it back? Straight from a PC? And what kind of PC . . . ?
alowishus
Solaricide
Posted 3:27 AM 2/10/08
damn, that's huge. there ya go criterion, don't even worry about putting that collection on blu-ray, you can just watch those uncompressed 4k masters in all their glory.
Solaricide
d1gw33d
Posted 4:02 AM 2/10/08
Nice write up.
Panasonic has been impressing me more and more lately. I have the 700U (2007) 1080p 50' Plasma I purchased last September. It started to have major issues with HDMI input (displays yellow tint on whites on the bottom 25% of the screen.) Panasonic is sending me a brand new 800U (2008 model - very nice set) under warranty.
d1gw33d
jozen
Posted 4:15 AM 2/10/08
@Adam: so how much is a regular mini cooper?
jozen
CoolTri
Posted 4:44 AM 2/10/08
@Chester_Copperpot: Find me a blender that it will blend in to find out, Then I'll make margarita's for everyone after that.
CoolTri
hippiekiller16
Posted 4:44 AM 2/10/08
You can't show pictures of her rear cause she is a lady?
hippiekiller16
Windhawk
Posted 5:37 AM 2/10/08
@EVEs_Mako: yes, 7,000 watts of direct consumption" is mind-bending... not to mention retina (and probably ice-cap) melting...
Windhawk
f0rge
Posted 5:57 AM 2/10/08
@Adam: you can watch this tv in the day, unlike a front projector
f0rge
skydiver38
Posted 5:48 AM 2/10/08
I would prefer a nice projector Plus a nice sound system. :) and I can take them any where.. in my Prius.! :D
skydiver38
skydiver38
Posted 5:47 AM 2/10/08
Wouldn't it be better in all ways to get a good projector, hook it up with DVD/BluRay Player with a nice sound system and you are ready to go..!
Cheaper and best part, based on space, you can change the viewing screen size ..!
Just a thought. :-)
skydiver38
skydiver38
Posted 5:45 AM 2/10/08
I now wonder, wouldnt it be better to actually get a projector and nice sound system instead of all this headache? cheaper and you can change the viewing size ..!
skydiver38
DJJS
Posted 8:03 AM 2/10/08
Sweet Post !
DJJS
etimy
Posted 9:53 AM 2/10/08
imagine some idiot trying to put one of these in his pick-up truck to take it home. Kind of makes the current craze for skinny displays seem highly relevant. Honestly, who wants a 150in TV that weighs 1700lbs.
etimy
brutek
Posted 1:17 PM 2/10/08
Easier for prosumer installation of front-projector. Waste-tech
brutek
someToast
Posted 8:08 PM 2/10/08
@etimy: I can't imagine it.
I can't get the person who could afford $140,000 for a TV and the person who'd try to take home that TV in a pickup truck to mentally merge into a single entity.
someToast
ngc6027
Posted 9:03 PM 2/10/08
"I can't drive!" lol
ngc6027
andyo
Posted 11:59 AM 3/10/08
Resolution is "only" TWICE of that of 1080p. 2160p is exactly what it is. Resolution is linear, only goes one way. Objects, provided everything else is up to snuff, would "only" be twice as sharp.
andyo
Wilson Rothman
Posted 2:51 AM 4/10/08
@andyo: Sounds like a semantic argument. If there are just twice as many pixels, do you say resolution is only 50% greater? My head hurts. 4X the pixels means 4X the resolution in my book.
Wilson Rothman