<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony a900 24.6-Megapixel Full-Frame DSLR Official, Only US$3000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/sony_a900_246megapixel_fullframe_dslr_official_only_3000-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/sony_a900_246megapixel_fullframe_dslr_official_only_3000-2/</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:23:20 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ollie</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/sony_a900_246megapixel_fullframe_dslr_official_only_3000-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11020</link>
		<dc:creator>Ollie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/sony_a900_246megapixel_fullframe_dslr_official_only_3000-2.html#comment-11020</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d argue a 3 year old 5D with half the MP produces a better image per ISO speed... can even be picky with the ISO 800 shots. I&#039;m sure someone will do a crop comparison soon enough :)&lt;br /&gt;
As for the in-body Image Stabiliser (sorry, Super SteadyShot or whatever they call it)... yeah it makes the lenses cheaper, but there&#039;s a reasons Canon and Nikon stick with in-lens IS... you can see the results in real time through the viewfinder!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d argue a 3 year old 5D with half the MP produces a better image per ISO speed&#8230; can even be picky with the ISO 800 shots. I&#8217;m sure someone will do a crop comparison soon enough :)<br />
As for the in-body Image Stabiliser (sorry, Super SteadyShot or whatever they call it)&#8230; yeah it makes the lenses cheaper, but there&#8217;s a reasons Canon and Nikon stick with in-lens IS&#8230; you can see the results in real time through the viewfinder!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
