Science
Scientists Do Extreme Close-Up On Milky Way's Black Hole
Posted by Kit Eaton at 9:39 PM on September 4, 2008
Forget "pretend" black holes in optical cables: astronomers at MIT have taken the highest-ever resolution imagery of the region of space near the giant black hole at the centre of our galaxy, as shown in this image. In fact, the bright spot in the centre is what they were looking at: it's a funky space-object dubbed SgrA* which may be a fiery disc of matter spinning round outside the event horizon.
Normally dust clouds between our solar system and the galaxy core get in the way of observing the region near the centre. The team achieved the feat not through a Wayne's World-style camera trick, but by observing at 1.3 mm radio wavelengths (which can traverse the dust) and using a Very Long Baseline Interferometry telescope. This links up radio telescopes in Hawaii, Arizona and California to make an effective compound radio telescope that's about 4,500km wide. As a result they could make images with a resolution about 1,000 times greater than the Hubble telescope.
But even that's not quite enough. Imaging SgrA* has supported the theory that a supermassive black hole is right there at the galactic central point ("our results are more evidence that we are looking at a black hole," as the team puts it), but despite being among the highest resolution astronomical observations ever made, the data's not quite good enough to image the shape of the glowing cloud. That data would reveal whether it's a true disc, with or without jets, and whether there's a dimmer region in the middle as gas is sucked into the black hole. We'll have to wait for a few years until future shorter-wavelength telescopes come online. Maybe then we'll be able to see if there's a huge robot-populated spaceship hovering just outside the hole. [New Scientist via Physorg]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
nachobel
Posted 10:28 PM 4/9/08
space goatsee in action!
heh, no seriously, that's pretty cool. I want to see what shape it is, go go more shorter wavelength telescopes!
nachobel
ps61318
Posted 10:27 PM 4/9/08
I'm curious what SgrA* is supposed to stand for. Reminds me of Sarah Jessica Parker's character in LA Story.
Anyway, I think the HeeChee get a bad rap. They are only trying to help us.
ps61318
Curves
Posted 10:06 PM 4/9/08
To boldly go.....I think its wonderful that we can peek out at the unknown before we go there. This is the stuff that makes science so cool for non science people.
Curves
Krrong
Posted 10:55 PM 4/9/08
If you think about it, eventually we'll all end up visiting this place in a couple of billion years as cosmic dust.
Krrong
Kit Eaton
Posted 10:55 PM 4/9/08
@ps61318: SanDeE* :-) A fave movie of mine.
Kit Eaton
JChristopher
Posted 10:54 PM 4/9/08
@ps61318: SgrA* = Sagittarius A* Here is a pic from Chandra: [chandra.harvard.edu]
This stuff is way cool.
JChristopher
hindsight2020
Posted 10:53 PM 4/9/08
the scientists will not rest until they open a portal and bring back something like "The Mist", then we are all screwed!
hindsight2020
OMG! Ponies!
Posted 10:37 PM 4/9/08
So that's what Switzerland is going to look like.
OMG! Ponies!
TendoMentis
Posted 11:07 PM 4/9/08
@lldsandsll: Accretion disk. If you don't know what it is, wikipedia it.
It's good reading fo' shizzle.
TendoMentis
lldsandsll
Posted 11:06 PM 4/9/08
if it's suckin up all the light, they got a pic how?
lldsandsll
MastaFalse
Posted 11:01 PM 4/9/08
Jupiter didn't ever do us any favors!
MastaFalse
MastaFalse
Posted 11:00 PM 4/9/08
Fluctuating Gravity Well? Space monsters? BUSTER MACHINES?! All of these we shall find at the center! Jupiter will be used to smack these monsters around!
MastaFalse
scarbrtj
Posted 10:59 PM 4/9/08
V.I.N.CENT... are you in there?
scarbrtj
TendoMentis
Posted 10:57 PM 4/9/08
@ps61318: I think it's Sagitarious A (resists the urge to wikipedia).
TendoMentis
mangamonster
Posted 11:32 PM 4/9/08
a few years? how about a few months...hellooo LHC~~
mangamonster
SigmundTheSeaMonster
Posted 11:30 PM 4/9/08
Invisible
To telescopic eye
Infinity
The star that would not die
All who dare
To cross her course
Are swallowed by
A fearsome force
Through the void
To be destroyed
Or is there something more?
Atomized ---- at the core
Or through the astral door ----
To soar....
SigmundTheSeaMonster
OMG! Ponies!
Posted 11:24 PM 4/9/08
@hindsight2020: "The Mist" doesn't come from interstellar portals opened by misguided scientists because all interstellar portals open onto Hell.
You've obviously never (a) played DOOM or (b) seen Event Horizon. While I recommend you play DOOM (often and for long stretches of time), I cannot stress the importance of you not seeing Event Horizon. It is a horrible movie and we will not speak of it again.
OMG! Ponies!
ps61318
Posted 11:52 PM 4/9/08
@JChristopher: @TendoMentis: Thank you, yes, that makes sense.
@Kit Eaton: Oh, absolutely. One of the few that my wife has stayed awake through MORE THAN ONCE!!! Bigger thumbs-up than that is not possible.
ps61318
ps61318
Posted 11:50 PM 4/9/08
@tabaks: Yes, ok, but let's toss in a dose of relativistic time dilatation effects. Because of all of the black holes out there what we see may have more or less relation to "real time."
ooooooooooooooooo
undereducated speculation on my part, but still....
ps61318
hindsight2020
Posted 11:45 PM 4/9/08
@OMG! Ponies!: I have saw Event Horizon and have seen Doom played. You have a valid point, we could already be living in hell and we don't even know it!
hindsight2020
tabaks
Posted 11:45 PM 4/9/08
I've noticed one very interesting fact. EVERYONE, and I MEAN EVERYONE, talks about these things in present tense. Which, if you spend a second thinking, is nonsense. For all intents and purposes in the real time world, we are ASTRONOMICALLY BLIND, worse than a bat. Why? because EVERYTHING we "see" is actually ancient history. Again, for all real time world intents and purposes, the whole rest of the universe (couple of thousands of light years away and onward) could have long disappeared in a spectacular cosmic explosion and we would know anything about it. Because all the light (stars, clouds, radiation) we see is tens of, millions of years old. And, thus, our "knowledge" of the universe is not current (can't be), it is ancient. whole civilizations could have emerged, developed, stagnated and died on any of the stars we see, and we still wouldn't know, because we don't know the last...say...million years of that star's and its planet's lives. Scary, if you ask me. We SEE the past ONLY, we live in a light speed-induced time traveling bubble. The only thing we can assume we know id this solar system. but, even then, the sun could have been gone for eight minutes before we know it. So, the evil Galactic empire could arrived with its ships, destroyed the sun and left in eight minutes and we would be oblivious about that and we'd die as such, too. SCARY!
tabaks
92BuickLeSabre
Posted 11:43 PM 4/9/08
I'm pretty sure that if you zoom out far enough you'll see that this is just a close-up shot of the inside of my wallet.
92BuickLeSabre
92BuickLeSabre
Posted 12:09 AM 5/9/08
@tabaks: You're kind of freakin' me out dude.
92BuickLeSabre
Alfonzo
Posted 12:35 AM 5/9/08
@tabaks: I think that most people realize this, but since, as you say, everything is in the past, we can just for the sake of convenience refer to in in the present tense.
I don't understand much (ie nothing) of the relativity class i took, but basically there was lots of "what is time?" shit and i decided to just go "everything is relative, nothing makes sense" and live with that. so we might as well say that what we see is what is real, so since there's no objective observation point from where we can go "okay Sirius B is exploding and it's sunday morning on earth" (except maybe a point equidistant from both events, but even then they'll only know waaay after it happens), who can say when "now" is? to summarize, a fish!
yeah, i have no idea. sorry.
Alfonzo
scarbrtj
Posted 12:29 AM 5/9/08
@tabaks:
You're thinking too linearly. That perception of time is helpful for our own day-to-day existence, but that experience is illusory.
[everythingforever.com]
scarbrtj
tabaks
Posted 12:28 AM 5/9/08
Oh, and get this one! As we're approaching the system, on our time warping star racer, we'd be treated to a sped-up timelapse show of the star aging rapidly before our eyes! And, it would either eventually "meet us in present" as we arrive or we'd see its spectacular disappearance which would, proportional to our remaiining distance to it, show us exactly, finally, how and when it disappeared, prompting us to break like hell and go back home in shame. 8^))
tabaks
HeyBeav
Posted 12:26 AM 5/9/08
I think black holes suck.
HeyBeav
tabaks
Posted 12:24 AM 5/9/08
@92BuickLeSabre:
Yup, sometime it really feels, if one tries to provoke an emotion in oneself, as sitting in a complete obliviousness, wrapped in a dark cloth of past. We, as beings, aren't built to easily perceive and get bothered by any of it. But, just think, any llight speed-fast galactic voyage to a 30000 light years distant star system (IF we EVER get such technology) out there would be a major gamble against the odds that the whole system we're trying to reach could have disappeared in a spectacular annihilation ten thousands years ago and there's nothing out there, waiting for the brave explorers. Chilling prospect. Any FIRST galactic joyride trip we'd take to a million years distant star, even on an instant-travel ship warp-time fabric-bending starcruiser ship would still be based on a...say...million years old star chart. Good luck! 8^))
tabaks
Phenostar
Posted 12:46 AM 5/9/08
@tabaks: I need whatever brew of coffee you're drinking. Now.
Phenostar
92BuickLeSabre
Posted 12:38 AM 5/9/08
@scarbrtj, Alfonzo, and tabaks: Seriously, this is why I only travel by TARDIS.
92BuickLeSabre
tabaks
Posted 1:04 AM 5/9/08
@92BuickLeSabre:
I'm just paying mine off. (Whew, it took some TIME, I tell ya!) Next week I'm folding back to Krummzrrwt, my home planet. 8^)))
tabaks
Curves
Posted 1:24 AM 5/9/08
@Alfonzo: "everything is relative, nothing makes sense" and live with that.
Thats the same answer I give when men ask me to explain women. Congrats, you have reached a level of understanding of females that few men ever attain.
Curves
Kit Eaton
Posted 1:22 AM 5/9/08
@tabaks: Present tense is used just for simplicity... it'd get pretty cluttered up with lots of "looking at object X but it's actually probably not there anymore" sentences. My astrophysics lectures were given in this style, as were my relativity ones.
Plus always remember: time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so.
Kit Eaton
Enochrewt
Posted 2:52 AM 5/9/08
Anyone read the Gregory Benford Galactic Center Series? I'm constantly reminded of it when I see stories like this, and how scary accurate the books are to real life so far. But I guess he is an astrophysicist so he might know what he's talking about...
Enochrewt
GadgetPlay
Posted 2:39 AM 5/9/08
@tabaks: Thank you for that incredibly lengthy and unnecessary explanation. Believe it or not, we are familiar with the speed of light. Try it out on your 9th grade lab partner, she might not be.
@tabaks: "Yup, sometime it really feels, if one tries to provoke an emotion in oneself, as sitting in a complete obliviousness, wrapped in a dark cloth of past."
I didn't think it could get worse...
@Phenostar: "@tabaks: I need whatever brew of coffee you're drinking. Now."
I'm guessing it's a near overdose of Mountain Dew, with maybe some weed thrown in between homeroom and study hall.
GadgetPlay
mildretard
Posted 3:28 AM 5/9/08
Black holes are nothing new. Every single one of us came out of some singularity or other. The universe must find these little eddies of consciousness (i.e. us) rather amusing and pathetic.
Bullocks to you, g-damn smug universe!
mildretard
CapitalC
Posted 3:45 AM 5/9/08
I don't want to see pictures or videos of the universe unless it happens in super-duper-slow-mo.
CapitalC
Stacky Botrus
Posted 4:57 AM 5/9/08
I photoshopped a black hole once.
Stacky Botrus
aec007
Posted 5:20 AM 5/9/08
@tabaks:
What's even more weird than that, is the fact that we SEE into the future.
Yes, that's right.
The connection lag time between the pre-processing of the eye's retina and the processing in the frontal cortex is such, that we could not possibly see the NOW.
So our vision system in actually processes images from the future at a rate of 1/10 second. Or in other words, making very good educated guesses of what we will see.
Otherwise, our bodies could not react (think friend or foe / flight or die) unless an event has already happened.
Example: When you look and touch something, there is no lag time between what [when] you see it and when you feel it in your hand. Yet the optical processing is behind 1/10 second.
Of note, that's why magic tricks work.
You are expecting to see something, but then you don't.
aec007
Cross-eyedCyclops
Posted 6:45 AM 5/9/08
Camera was so large, they couldn't find the focus knob? :D
Cross-eyedCyclops
gStar
Posted 7:50 AM 5/9/08
@ps61318:
Sagittarius (the constellation) A (standard designator) "star", cuz it's special, pretty much.
@lldsandsll:
It doesn't suck up all the light. Inside the event horizon, nothing gets out, but this pic is of the stuff swarming just outside the event horizon (a few to a hundred horizon radii), which is actually quite bright. I find it kinda neat the the brightest things in the universe are right around the biggest black holes.
@tabaks:
Enh, Sgr A* is only ~30,000 lyrs away, so we are seeing light only 30,000 years old. Since the system was likely formed over > 10 billion years, we are getting a pretty good idea of what it looks like now-ish. It doesn't really keep us up at night.
PS: if you were wondering how hard very-long baseline interferometry is at millimeter/sub-millimeter wavelengths, let me assure you, friggin' hard. These guys are total tech-nerd badasses (esp. Shep Doeleman).
gStar
shade-black
Posted 11:15 AM 5/9/08
@tabaks: 9 minutes? nope... it depends on HOW the star dies, or gets destroyed.
shade-black
tabaks
Posted 4:19 AM 6/9/08
@GadgetPlay:
Oops, you forgot your daily dose of chill pills. Sorry, I didn't know or I would've adjusted the speech, especially the unnecessary parts to appease your heightened sense of self-righteousness. man, you super heroes are so finicky sometimes. 8^/
tabaks
El_Guappo
Posted 10:34 PM 4/9/08
Ahhh... shouldnt that hole be black?
You see it all the time, tourists taking photos of something behind a piece of glass and not turning of the flash. Oh well may be next time.
El_Guappo
Schratboy
Posted 11:20 PM 4/9/08
I read an interesting book that peripherally addresses the milky way black hole and related mythologies called Mayan Cosmogenesis 2012. Some very interesting and entertaining research went into the book.
Schratboy
RockNRollBeaver
Posted 10:08 PM 4/9/08
I don't understand how people know where the center of the galaxy is... Where's the beginning and where's the end?
RockNRollBeaver