<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Chrome EULA Claims Ownership of Everything You Create on Chrome, From Blog Posts to Emails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/google_chrome_eula_claims_ownership_of_everything_you_create_on_chrome_from_blog_posts_to_emails-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/google_chrome_eula_claims_ownership_of_everything_you_create_on_chrome_from_blog_posts_to_emails-2/</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:23:20 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Narukari</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/google_chrome_eula_claims_ownership_of_everything_you_create_on_chrome_from_blog_posts_to_emails-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11177</link>
		<dc:creator>Narukari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 20:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/google_chrome_eula_claims_ownership_of_everything_you_create_on_chrome_from_blog_posts_to_emails-2.html#comment-11177</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am currently taking business law, and I assure you that an EULA with this in it would be immediately thrown out of court before the case even started.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A contract requires a &quot;meeting of the minds&quot;, despite what a lot of software businesses want, they can&#039;t just put anything into an EULA and have you agree yes or no to it to use their program.  They can put reasonable agreements such as &quot;you agree not to use their program for profit&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Since there is no meeting of the minds they cannot enforce such a contract upon someone.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am currently taking business law, and I assure you that an EULA with this in it would be immediately thrown out of court before the case even started.</p>
<p>A contract requires a &#8220;meeting of the minds&#8221;, despite what a lot of software businesses want, they can&#8217;t just put anything into an EULA and have you agree yes or no to it to use their program.  They can put reasonable agreements such as &#8220;you agree not to use their program for profit&#8221;.</p>
<p>Since there is no meeting of the minds they cannot enforce such a contract upon someone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/google_chrome_eula_claims_ownership_of_everything_you_create_on_chrome_from_blog_posts_to_emails-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11176</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/google_chrome_eula_claims_ownership_of_everything_you_create_on_chrome_from_blog_posts_to_emails-2.html#comment-11176</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Seriously? Any legal types fancy pitching in a stating if this would actually fly in a court of law? Also, if I don&#039;t opt to send usage statistics, how the hell do they know what I did with the browser??&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously? Any legal types fancy pitching in a stating if this would actually fly in a court of law? Also, if I don&#8217;t opt to send usage statistics, how the hell do they know what I did with the browser??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owned</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/google_chrome_eula_claims_ownership_of_everything_you_create_on_chrome_from_blog_posts_to_emails-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11175</link>
		<dc:creator>Owned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/google_chrome_eula_claims_ownership_of_everything_you_create_on_chrome_from_blog_posts_to_emails-2.html#comment-11175</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There&#039;s also a new secret clause in the EULA? &quot;Google revoke the right to do no evil.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s also a new secret clause in the EULA? &#8220;Google revoke the right to do no evil.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/google_chrome_eula_claims_ownership_of_everything_you_create_on_chrome_from_blog_posts_to_emails-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11174</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 22:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/09/google_chrome_eula_claims_ownership_of_everything_you_create_on_chrome_from_blog_posts_to_emails-2.html#comment-11174</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Google Rule #1 - &quot;don&#039;t be evil&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Another one bites the dust...assholes!&lt;br /&gt;
&gt;-=)))))*&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Rule #1 &#8211; &#8220;don&#8217;t be evil&#8221;<br />
Another one bites the dust&#8230;assholes!<br />
>-=)))))*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
