<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unconfirmed: More Canon EOS 5D Mark II Specs Leak, Lookin&#8217; Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/unconfirmed_more_canon_eos_5d_mark_ii_specs_leak_lookin_good-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/unconfirmed_more_canon_eos_5d_mark_ii_specs_leak_lookin_good-2/</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:57:57 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/unconfirmed_more_canon_eos_5d_mark_ii_specs_leak_lookin_good-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11282</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/unconfirmed_more_canon_eos_5d_mark_ii_specs_leak_lookin_good-2.html#comment-11282</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Aside from a few features such as the 19point AF some of these specs seem the same or better then Canons current flagship 1DsMKIII. If the price is the same as the current 5D or cheaper then alot of the current 1DsKIII owners like myself would feel a little cheated and ripped off. Alot of pro&#039;s were expecting a 5DmkII to be more around the 16MP rating with good ISO and dynamic range. If these are indeed the specs then Canon have yet again produce a great tool and outdone Nikon.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from a few features such as the 19point AF some of these specs seem the same or better then Canons current flagship 1DsMKIII. If the price is the same as the current 5D or cheaper then alot of the current 1DsKIII owners like myself would feel a little cheated and ripped off. Alot of pro&#8217;s were expecting a 5DmkII to be more around the 16MP rating with good ISO and dynamic range. If these are indeed the specs then Canon have yet again produce a great tool and outdone Nikon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
