<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Police Radio Keeps Disrupting Sprinklers, Local Residents Get FCC Involved</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/police_radio_keeps_disrupting_sprinklers_local_residents_get_fcc_involved-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/police_radio_keeps_disrupting_sprinklers_local_residents_get_fcc_involved-2/</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:19:01 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cortland Richmond</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/police_radio_keeps_disrupting_sprinklers_local_residents_get_fcc_involved-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10298</link>
		<dc:creator>Cortland Richmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 05:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/police_radio_keeps_disrupting_sprinklers_local_residents_get_fcc_involved-2.html#comment-10298</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve done some poking around on the Net and am glad to report that it seems the complaining City went beyond the terms of its license, leading to reception capabilities the frequency coordinators could not have foreseen. It may even be trying to get someone else to pay for replacing the equipment, which at 15 years could could be reaching the end of its useful life.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done some poking around on the Net and am glad to report that it seems the complaining City went beyond the terms of its license, leading to reception capabilities the frequency coordinators could not have foreseen. It may even be trying to get someone else to pay for replacing the equipment, which at 15 years could could be reaching the end of its useful life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McFerren</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/police_radio_keeps_disrupting_sprinklers_local_residents_get_fcc_involved-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10297</link>
		<dc:creator>John McFerren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 15:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/police_radio_keeps_disrupting_sprinklers_local_residents_get_fcc_involved-2.html#comment-10297</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is very simple. The receivers are probably being overloaded by the new communications system. The residents have no legal recourse in the matter as a licensed system is interfering with an unlicensed system, even if the unlicensed system is operating legally. Part 15 of the FCC rule which governs unlicensed devices and legal unlicensed operation states these rules.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very simple. The receivers are probably being overloaded by the new communications system. The residents have no legal recourse in the matter as a licensed system is interfering with an unlicensed system, even if the unlicensed system is operating legally. Part 15 of the FCC rule which governs unlicensed devices and legal unlicensed operation states these rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cortland Richmond</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/police_radio_keeps_disrupting_sprinklers_local_residents_get_fcc_involved-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10296</link>
		<dc:creator>Cortland Richmond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/police_radio_keeps_disrupting_sprinklers_local_residents_get_fcc_involved-2.html#comment-10296</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s a consequence of a cheap radio control.  The FCC lets us use cheap, unlicensed radio links with the condition we accept interference.   The manufacturer COULD have used better receivers to avoid the problem, but saw no need. Most places, there still isn&#039;t.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a consequence of a cheap radio control.  The FCC lets us use cheap, unlicensed radio links with the condition we accept interference.   The manufacturer COULD have used better receivers to avoid the problem, but saw no need. Most places, there still isn&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
