<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PC Manufacturers See Piracy As A Hidden Benefit, Says id Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/pc_manufacturers_see_piracy_as_a_hidden_benefit_says_id_software-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/pc_manufacturers_see_piracy_as_a_hidden_benefit_says_id_software-2/</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:49:31 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/pc_manufacturers_see_piracy_as_a_hidden_benefit_says_id_software-2/comment-page-1/#comment-11383</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 04:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/pc_manufacturers_see_piracy_as_a_hidden_benefit_says_id_software-2.html#comment-11383</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You know there is no obligation WHATSOEVER for the hardware manufacturers to implement these sorts of things. They shouldn&#039;t do it, they hopefully won&#039;t do it and why is it hardware makers responsibility to protect a market&#039;s business model??&lt;br /&gt;
It infuriates me that this sort of BS is even spoken of. It is sort of like a car maker being criticised by an oil company because it makes an efficient car that uses less fossil fuel!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know there is no obligation WHATSOEVER for the hardware manufacturers to implement these sorts of things. They shouldn&#8217;t do it, they hopefully won&#8217;t do it and why is it hardware makers responsibility to protect a market&#8217;s business model??<br />
It infuriates me that this sort of BS is even spoken of. It is sort of like a car maker being criticised by an oil company because it makes an efficient car that uses less fossil fuel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
