<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Notes: Why Is StreetView Getting So Much Negative Press?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press/</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:52:23 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: boc</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press/comment-page-1/#comment-10467</link>
		<dc:creator>boc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 06:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press.html#comment-10467</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Re: You&#039;re point about Bill&#039;s case and the greater invasion of privacy - that would not be a privacy issue as Bill would have had to given consent for SMH to obtain that story.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Generally though, most privacy concerns have been addressed by the time it was launched here. Still it&#039;d be easier/simpler if they just removed people all together from images. I know people that are easily identifiable by the clothes they where.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also there is a difference between you standing in front of my house and taking a photo or just looking at me and Street View. I am aware of your presence and what you&#039;re doing. If I don&#039;t like it I can tell you to piss off.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Street View does not make it&#039;s presence obvious that it is capturing you, whether at home or out and about. That is a concern. If you were paranoid you would have to retrace all your steps on Street View to check you didn&#039;t show up anywhere.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: You&#8217;re point about Bill&#8217;s case and the greater invasion of privacy &#8211; that would not be a privacy issue as Bill would have had to given consent for SMH to obtain that story.</p>
<p>Generally though, most privacy concerns have been addressed by the time it was launched here. Still it&#8217;d be easier/simpler if they just removed people all together from images. I know people that are easily identifiable by the clothes they where.</p>
<p>Also there is a difference between you standing in front of my house and taking a photo or just looking at me and Street View. I am aware of your presence and what you&#8217;re doing. If I don&#8217;t like it I can tell you to piss off.</p>
<p>Street View does not make it&#8217;s presence obvious that it is capturing you, whether at home or out and about. That is a concern. If you were paranoid you would have to retrace all your steps on Street View to check you didn&#8217;t show up anywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TedJ</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press/comment-page-1/#comment-10466</link>
		<dc:creator>TedJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press.html#comment-10466</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This kind of media hysteria is hardly anything new, but I fear this story won&#039;t die out until someone finds the SV image of Ray Martin clubbing a homeless person.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of media hysteria is hardly anything new, but I fear this story won&#8217;t die out until someone finds the SV image of Ray Martin clubbing a homeless person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demis</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press/comment-page-1/#comment-10465</link>
		<dc:creator>Demis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press.html#comment-10465</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I know hundreds of Aussies who looked at the service the other day when it launched, emailed around their houses/workplaces to all their friends, and remarked about &quot;how cool it is&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What I didn&#039;t hear were any complaints - from anyone. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It bothers me that the most interesting way the media chose to report the story was to focus on the vocal minority, blow it way up out of proportion, and act like the entire country was up in arms.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;At the end of the day, apart from the &#039;private road&#039; issue, I&#039;m yet to see any other privacy outcries which aren&#039;t based upon someone doing something they probably wouldn&#039;t want to get busted doing. The google cameras could easily have been a friend or colleague walking down the same street, busting them leaving the porn shop, or catching them asleep at the wheel of their work vehicle.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Let them put their 6-month-old photos up online. What&#039;s the big deal? If &quot;Bill&quot; doesn&#039;t like seeing himself passed out drunk on his mothers lawn, the issue should not be with Google (who provide adequate removal services) but with the SMH which doesn&#039;t. And &quot;Bill&quot;, despite your grief, there&#039;s always crawling those extra few metres out of the gutter next time - it really isn&#039;t the place for a sleep....&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know hundreds of Aussies who looked at the service the other day when it launched, emailed around their houses/workplaces to all their friends, and remarked about &#8220;how cool it is&#8221;.</p>
<p>What I didn&#8217;t hear were any complaints &#8211; from anyone. </p>
<p>It bothers me that the most interesting way the media chose to report the story was to focus on the vocal minority, blow it way up out of proportion, and act like the entire country was up in arms.</p>
<p>At the end of the day, apart from the &#8216;private road&#8217; issue, I&#8217;m yet to see any other privacy outcries which aren&#8217;t based upon someone doing something they probably wouldn&#8217;t want to get busted doing. The google cameras could easily have been a friend or colleague walking down the same street, busting them leaving the porn shop, or catching them asleep at the wheel of their work vehicle.</p>
<p>Let them put their 6-month-old photos up online. What&#8217;s the big deal? If &#8220;Bill&#8221; doesn&#8217;t like seeing himself passed out drunk on his mothers lawn, the issue should not be with Google (who provide adequate removal services) but with the SMH which doesn&#8217;t. And &#8220;Bill&#8221;, despite your grief, there&#8217;s always crawling those extra few metres out of the gutter next time &#8211; it really isn&#8217;t the place for a sleep&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stew</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press/comment-page-1/#comment-10464</link>
		<dc:creator>Stew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press.html#comment-10464</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I completely agree. I have no problem whatsoever with it. It&#039;s there for everyone to see if we were to drive there in person, so seriously - what&#039;s wrong with looking at low-res months-old pics? How is looking at the street view of a completely public road an invasion of privacy?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s fun to jump on a bandwagon as long as it has legitimate merit, but this one doesn&#039;t. But the storm will soon pass (hopefully) and people will find something else to complain about.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree. I have no problem whatsoever with it. It&#8217;s there for everyone to see if we were to drive there in person, so seriously &#8211; what&#8217;s wrong with looking at low-res months-old pics? How is looking at the street view of a completely public road an invasion of privacy?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fun to jump on a bandwagon as long as it has legitimate merit, but this one doesn&#8217;t. But the storm will soon pass (hopefully) and people will find something else to complain about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adz</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press/comment-page-1/#comment-10463</link>
		<dc:creator>Adz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press.html#comment-10463</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;At least &#039;Bill&#039; can tell exactly when the StreetView photo&#039;s were taken in his mum&#039;s street. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We all had to guess approximately when the pictures were taken.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least &#8216;Bill&#8217; can tell exactly when the StreetView photo&#8217;s were taken in his mum&#8217;s street. </p>
<p>We all had to guess approximately when the pictures were taken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press/comment-page-1/#comment-10462</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press.html#comment-10462</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here here.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve spoken to half a dozen people about Street View. They&#039;ve all cited privacy concerns. I&#039;ve responded with &quot;so what are your concerns about SV&#039;s privacy then?&quot;. They have nothing to say. They don&#039;t even know themselves! Is it fashionable to be &#039;concerned&#039; about Street View&#039;s privacy practices?!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spoken to half a dozen people about Street View. They&#8217;ve all cited privacy concerns. I&#8217;ve responded with &#8220;so what are your concerns about SV&#8217;s privacy then?&#8221;. They have nothing to say. They don&#8217;t even know themselves! Is it fashionable to be &#8216;concerned&#8217; about Street View&#8217;s privacy practices?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press/comment-page-1/#comment-10461</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 03:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press.html#comment-10461</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If this is approved in America where they are always on about rights and privacy, I don&#039;t see why it is such and issue for Australia. I&#039;m angry that I cant see my house on street view clearly.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is approved in America where they are always on about rights and privacy, I don&#8217;t see why it is such and issue for Australia. I&#8217;m angry that I cant see my house on street view clearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press/comment-page-1/#comment-10460</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 02:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/notes_why_is_streetview_getting_so_much_negative_press.html#comment-10460</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;another case of the media blowing something out of proportion.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>another case of the media blowing something out of proportion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
