Science
Much Cheaper Fuel Cells On The Way With New Prototype
Posted by Gizmodo US Edition at 2:00 AM on August 3, 2008
Australian researchers have developed a new fuel cell prototype that could lead to much cheaper, more efficient fuel cell vehicles in the near future. Scientists at Monash University in Melbourne created a new cathode that could bypass the need for expensive platinum nanoparticles, which adds about US$3500 to US$4000 to the sticker price of current fuel cells.
The team says its new cathode, made of a conductive plastic called PEDOT, could be manufactured for just several hundred dollars. Even better, PEDOT is much more stable than platinum and doesn't have platinum's pesky clumping problems or aversion to carbon monoxide.
The researchers are now planning on building fuel cells with the cathode in 3D, to maximise the surface area available to generate a current. With this new breakthrough and the solar-charged process engineered by MIT scientists a few days ago, it's been kind of an awesome week for fuel cell science. [ABC via Treehugger]
Tags: batteries | cars | energy | fuel cells | green | hydrogen | oxygen | research | science | water

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
nocar
Posted 2:37 AM 3/8/08
@enchantedgoose: Sunshine power, free forever, no gas.
nocar
crazydave_w
Posted 2:33 AM 3/8/08
Basically, any chemistry that requires splitting H2 into 2H (such as in a fuel cell) or forming H2 from 2H, requires platinum as a catalyst. Considering the rarity of platinum, without breakthroughs like this (if it works) a hydrogen-based transportation system would be impossible.
crazydave_w
Elaine Chow
Posted 2:32 AM 3/8/08
@enchantedgoose: fuel cells no use platinum anymore. platinum expensive. plastic good. scientists awesome.
@ackthbbft: Perhaps! It'll be interesting to see how all these technologies get combined to make the ultimate fuel cell.
Elaine Chow
ackthbbft
Posted 2:26 AM 3/8/08
Some people were complaining about that new MIT solar-storage invention still requiring platinum. Perhaps this will help with that, as well?
ackthbbft
enchantedgoose
Posted 2:10 AM 3/8/08
i only understand the first 6 words of each paragraph
enchantedgoose
fastm3driver
Posted 3:09 AM 3/8/08
This is the first actually viability "green" tech I've heard of in over 3 years. If it works, caveat emptor.
You still need hydrogen to make the fuel cell work and there is still no energy efficient way to to make that(maybe that MIT photosynthesis thing?). Then you have the problem or driving around with a bomb in your car(compressed hydrogen). Like 3 years ago there was some Sweede's saying they could trap high amount of hydrogen into solid pellets; where did that go? With all this green talk lately you are going to see all kinds of people promising the future to raise money. Just like in the late 70's. Now is the time for sucking money from the dumb asses following science with their hearts than their heads.
There is also no mention of the possible weight, cost of the new plastic, how it recycles, or how much space it takes up. I could go on but my radar goes off like crazy when they leave out the important details.
fastm3driver
zarchitect
Posted 2:57 AM 3/8/08
(Begin sarcasm)
I think we should scrap the whole thing and drill for more oil - it's cheap and there's plenty of it! While we're at it, let's just eliminate all funding for alternative fuel and storage research as it's obviously a waste of time. People want and need large trucks and SUVs to go to the grocery store with - none of this pesky trying to come up with a better solution business.
(End sarcasm)
Awesome week in science!
zarchitect
fastm3driver
Posted 3:13 AM 3/8/08
@zarchitect: Right, for now we should drill like crazy and build a bunch of nuclear power plants and maybe a few wind mills.
(no sarcasm)
fastm3driver
nocar
Posted 3:49 AM 3/8/08
@fastm3driver: If scientists worried about every "important detail" nothing would ever get invented. These guys are on the opposite side of the planet from MIT in Cambridge. It's great that they both had breakthroughs toward solving a different aspect of the same problem. They are not P.R. flak writing press releases.
(also note: fuel cells have many other uses than moving cars.)
nocar
ceilingFANBOY
Posted 5:43 AM 3/8/08
@fastm3driver: Hydrogen fuel is actually safer than gasoline because if a hydrogen tank is punctured, it dissipates harmlessly into the air. Hydrogen was not the culprit of the Hindenburg or Challenger.
ceilingFANBOY
Felix26591
Posted 6:38 AM 3/8/08
Yes this is a good week for renewable energy. Hope it reaches market fast, i;m looking to buy solar panels for my house and run car on hydrogen.
Felix26591
GadgetPlay
Posted 8:03 AM 3/8/08
@zarchitect: "I think we should scrap the whole thing and drill for more oil"
We don't need to "scrap" anything, or "eliminate funding" for anything to drill for more oil. There is plenty left, but there's no reason not to work at the problem from both ends. It says something that your "sarcasm" makes more sense than your actual meaning.
GadgetPlay
malcs
Posted 10:18 AM 3/8/08
nuclear energy is where its at!!
malcs
Dollarbill4
Posted 12:49 PM 3/8/08
Solar cell film that can be printed onto rolls of paper. Breaking down water into Hydrogen and Oxygen that can be stored (used perhaps in Honda's Hydrogen type car) to be turned back into electricity for the house or car. I see the technologies starting to come together in a meaningful and affordable way.
If I had the money I would be thinking of inking contracts with the researchers and doing a startup business producing units for homes and industry. The begining of a new infrastructure that could bring to reality practical hydrogen type of hybrid vehicles.
Dollarbill4
rockntrumpet
Posted 1:03 PM 3/8/08
What is it with all this crap recently, and I do mean crap. C'mon people, it's just another load of crap that isn't going anywhere. Take it from me (I do research in this area). There's a whole lot of stuff going nowhere fast.
rockntrumpet
GadgetPlay
Posted 2:28 PM 3/8/08
@Dollarbill4: "If I had the money I would be thinking of inking contracts with the researchers and doing a startup business producing units for homes and industry."
It's a shame that this has not occurred to anyone but you.
@aaj111: "I'm beginning to wonder if Australians are smarter than Americans."
It would appear not. No group is smarter than Americans. (It's a shame that I must say this before the outraged flaming occurs, but no group is smarter than any other. Except the Irish.)
GadgetPlay
aaj111
Posted 2:06 PM 3/8/08
I'm beginning to wonder if Australians are smarter than Americans.
aaj111
liquidsoapdispenser
Posted 1:15 AM 4/8/08
@enchantedgoose: you made me laugh out loud
@Elaine Chow: you also made me laugh out loud
@fastm3driver: you made me cry
@rockntrumpet: you also made me cry
liquidsoapdispenser
jacktaka
Posted 2:13 AM 3/8/08
Say goodbye to nuclear power.
jacktaka
shawn_dude
Posted 2:26 AM 5/8/08
@fastm3driver: "Right, for now we should drill like crazy and build a bunch of nuclear power plants and maybe a few wind mills.
(no sarcasm)"
Oil has far more uses than powering our cars. We're better off leaving it in the ground for later. While it is now possible to make some types of plastic out of food crops, durable plastics are still limited to oil. Look around you and count the number of durable plastic items and ask yourself what they'd be made out of otherwise, if anything at all.
Build the nukes. Build the wind turbines. Let the market decide the right time to pull the oil out.
shawn_dude
MerrillBabakin
Posted 6:21 AM 6/8/08
Very interesting. As a fuel cell scientist, I do not need too many "important details". Just one: how LONG does it work? It is not the first non-precious catalyst. Many die in just hours... Still, very interesting...
MerrillBabakin