<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mozilla&#8217;s Ubiquity For Firefox Alpha 0.1 Looks Fantastic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/mozillas_ubiquity_for_firefox_alpha_01_looks_fantastic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/mozillas_ubiquity_for_firefox_alpha_01_looks_fantastic/</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:20:02 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mr-crash</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/mozillas_ubiquity_for_firefox_alpha_01_looks_fantastic/comment-page-1/#comment-11279</link>
		<dc:creator>mr-crash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/mozillas_ubiquity_for_firefox_alpha_01_looks_fantastic.html#comment-11279</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This reminds me of launchy (for windows) or quicksilver (for OSX) - except instead of working with shortcuts and applications that are on your computer, it interacts with websites and applications that are out there on the net.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree with StevoTheDevo, the set up (when it gets larger - not so much now) will probably be a little complex... But if they can get past this it has the potential to be fantastic. I think i&#039;ll download it now too!&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This reminds me of launchy (for windows) or quicksilver (for OSX) &#8211; except instead of working with shortcuts and applications that are on your computer, it interacts with websites and applications that are out there on the net.</p>
<p>I agree with StevoTheDevo, the set up (when it gets larger &#8211; not so much now) will probably be a little complex&#8230; But if they can get past this it has the potential to be fantastic. I think i&#8217;ll download it now too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StevoTheDevo</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/mozillas_ubiquity_for_firefox_alpha_01_looks_fantastic/comment-page-1/#comment-11278</link>
		<dc:creator>StevoTheDevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 05:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/mozillas_ubiquity_for_firefox_alpha_01_looks_fantastic.html#comment-11278</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I can see how powerful it is but getting it workable for genreal users will be the harder part. Even for me, a computer savvy person but fairly coding illiterate user, I imagine the setup process to tell Ubiquity that you use gmail for example (and what your user/pass is) to be fairly complicated and time consuming.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see how powerful it is but getting it workable for genreal users will be the harder part. Even for me, a computer savvy person but fairly coding illiterate user, I imagine the setup process to tell Ubiquity that you use gmail for example (and what your user/pass is) to be fairly complicated and time consuming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/mozillas_ubiquity_for_firefox_alpha_01_looks_fantastic/comment-page-1/#comment-11277</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 03:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/08/mozillas_ubiquity_for_firefox_alpha_01_looks_fantastic.html#comment-11277</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This looks fantastic - getting it now. I do think, however, that like most fantastic operation assisting programs general users will only realise or be able to comprehend about 10% of what its actually capable of, but surely this will usher in a new Web 4.0 or whatever we&#039;re up to now.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks fantastic &#8211; getting it now. I do think, however, that like most fantastic operation assisting programs general users will only realise or be able to comprehend about 10% of what its actually capable of, but surely this will usher in a new Web 4.0 or whatever we&#8217;re up to now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
