Vehicles
How it Feels to Fly a Jetpack
Posted by Mark Wilson at 2:30 AM on August 5, 2008
I flip the ignition switch and 113kg of engines, turbines and gasoline roar hello. In terms of horsepower, I was carrying a small sports car on my back. I'd like to say that I grin confidently and give the cameras a wink, like some young Chuck Yeager or Evel Knievel, but the smile leaves my face.
Instead, I gun the throttle. It is time to fly.
I was at the EAA AirVenture Oshkosh Wisconsin Air show, which is basically Woodstock with planes. For one week, the local airport, a normally nondescript and noncommercial entity, fills with 8.3km of every aircraft imaginable. And everyone camps out. Just picture a priceless antique WWI fighter restored to perfect luster. Now put a two-person Coleman tent beside it. If you duplicate that scene a few thousand times, that's the Oshkosh air show.
Oh, and there's always some hotshot dive-bombing in the sky. Today, as I prepped to test out the Martin Jetpack, I could be that hotshot (or maybe just that yuppie who always wanted to be the hotshot, dying with a Blue Cross card in one hand and a Darwin award in the other).
In photographs, the Martin Jetpack made my stomach drop. Even compared to other jetpacks, it is huge, with garbage-can-sized, turbines.

At the launch strip, it was unceremoniously unloaded from a Ryder truck--not exactly the invention's most glorious photo op, but the delivery was a nod to its humble surroundings. Standing in front of the device among the crowds, it didn't scare me so much. This jetpack didn't look like the garage-born contraption I'd thought it to be (and to some extent it actually is) but a glossy, hi-tech device that was crudely slapped with a "sold" sticker teasing its US$100,000 price tag.
Martin's "jetpack" is technically misnamed. The two high-speed fans on the pack's rear have no internal combustion and fire nothing but room temperature air at the ground. Meanwhile, it was the 200HP engine that looked like it wanted to crack free of its pretty housing, barely visible from under the surface, a bucking mustang pulling a buggy.
Waiting for my chance to ride, I'd picked up some of the individual pack components on display in the Martin booth. It quickly became apparent that nearly the entirety of the pack's 113kg weight was saved for its motor. Huge chunks of the paneling were unnervingly light--almost weightless, really. A mixture of carbon fibre and Kevlar, one hollow piece felt like the water tank from a military-grade Super Soaker. I wondered if it would support my weight should I stand on it. I never tried, but I bet it could have at least put up a good fight.
After giving the Martin Jetpack a visual inspection and a solid grope, I was feeling pretty confident about my flight, despite Martin's admission to a few testing "incidents" during the pack's 20+ years of development.
We prepped for launch in the ultralight area of the festival, far from the crowds in case anything bad should happen. Unlike the ultra-chic grounds showcasing personal jets and the less-ostentatious (but probably equally rich) vintage plane camp, we were among relative blue collars flying little more than motorised kites, lighting their charcoal barbecues on rusty porta-grills after landing.
On any other day, the grass runway could have doubled as a pick-up football field.
After dressing in an undersized flight suit that I was warned to keep black, not red or yellow, I made my slow-mo trek to the pack. The sun was setting as a soft breeze rippled the grass like waves on the ocean. It really wouldn't be the worst place to die by fuel explosion or propeller decapitation, but I would have liked more witnesses and maybe a cooler jumpsuit.
Then it was time to mount up. The pack's design is a bit odd in that it appears to have a seat, but there's nothing really holding your butt in. Instead, a body harness straps you to the machine á la parachute so tightly that you simultaneously half-sit and half-stand. The only thing supporting the majority of the pilot's weight is the jetpack itself, which has well-balanced built-in support legs. "It's uncomfortable now, but you won't notice in the air," an engineer assured me, referring to a set of straps quickly invading my crotch. He could tell I didn't believe him, but to his credit, he ended up being right.
Your arms rest on half-cylinders like you'd see in arm crutches, evoking fleeting images of me as a paraplegic. Especially as I was getting a feel for the throttle/pitch and tilt dual joysticks, my forearms felt twisted in a different direction than my hands. To crank the throttle 100%, it required an uncomfortable wrist rotation.
From within the cockpit, I noticed the jetpack's display for the first time. Resting around waist-high, I immediately realised that it was too low to ever use while flying. They hinted that a helmet-based HUD was in the works, but then they handed me some basic headgear. Putting it on made me think of the possibilities of crashing, and yet, I still had no clue how to fly this thing with strange uncomfortable controls that looked nothing like my Xbox controller and controller gauges that were out of my field of vision. They barely prepped me with any directions on how to fly her, and yet, I was about to.
The helmet censored my peripheral vision and as it steamed up, the smudgy plastic visor blurred what little vision I had left, like someone had conveniently smeared a jar of Vasoline over the most critical sense for flight.
I flipped on the engine. I could not smell the exhaust or feel its vibration.
But I could hear it, groaning like a dirt bike that had just hit puberty. One thumbs up. Two thumbs up. Glenn Martin placed his hand over mine on the throttle and gave me a nod. I was suddenly very, very comforted that I was being babied so much, that the jetpack's inventor would intercede if I laid down too much testosterone.
My survival instinct kicked in a bit harder: What if I shot 100 feet in the sky? What if the pack flipped me headfirst into the ground? What if the pack flipped me headfirst into the ground and then pounded my head repeatedly into the dirt? What if it just exploded?
With all these completely rational fears filling my head, I twisted the stick. Maybe it's because while my senses are muffled, and my body is strapped to this contraption, the throttle is the one thing I still have control over.
The engine responds by flattening every blade of grass in a 10-foot radius and humming intently.
For a second, I wonder if I am giving it enough gas. And then I can't feel the ground.
I am flying.
I rise about a yard and instinctively kick back the throttle. The system responds just as I expect--somehow I cut the gas just the right amount to hover perfectly.
And then I "stand still" in the air, dumbfounded, not sure what to do and not necessarily wanting to do anything else. There are a lot of people taking pictures, but instead of feeling glamorous I reach my confused feet for the ground like an overgrown baby.
The sensation is not as I'd expected. I don't feel pulled up, but it isn't weightlessness either. I simply rise.
That detachment is frightening. I was told by one engineer that he flew by feel, but right now I can't feel a damn thing. Pitch, roll, yew--or was it yaw--who knew?
I have an impulse to cut the throttle and bring her down, but remember that a small squadron of experienced engineers were there just to prevent me from breaking myself (or their only working prototype). I am safe, I am safe, I am safe, I tell myself repeatedly. My left hand jams the gas and without the feel of any obvious guiding propulsion, I move forward.
Dust and grass flies everywhere. Nearby gawkers have their clothing pushed tightly to their skin and they shield their faces. For about 6 metres, I glide over a perfectly smooth invisible track. I am the eye of the hurricane, the calm and the storm! And before I know it, I am rapidly heading for a line of cameras bordering the flight area. Chopping the throttle ended the flight. The landing was softer than I'd have thought, with none of the pack's weight burdening my spine or legs, although that could have been a lot different had I cut the gas from the rated 400 feet of altitude.
And as cliché as it may be, the flight felt like a lifetime. Total actual time free from the tyranny of gravity: about 15 seconds.
Giddy, I can only nod "yes" to onlookers as the engine went silent, the only motion I feel coming from adrenaline jitters.
I want to do it again.
With a basic understanding of the machine, I imagine all the things I can do better the second time around, like turning, going higher, and making a more confident landing for the crowd. It really is a nice machine.
But as someone somewhere once said, the first one's free; the second will cost you. And there were no more rides to be had with the US$100k jetpack until I bought one.

Coming down from the high over the next several hours, I replayed the event a hundred of times in my head. Because as pitiful as I looked fumbling just a few feet over the ground, the act was flying and it was as remarkable as all geeks imagine it.
At one point I guess that Martin hadn't exaggerated the pack's ability to cruise at a 300-400 foot altitude. The pack's engine had a lot of power left in it. And even though I didn't make a note during the test, I bet that I didn't even top 3000 RPM during my launch. My test flight was the equivalent of driving a Ferrari on a school day when children are present.
The other sadder, inevitable point that I realised is that despite what you may have heard about the "world's first practical jetpack," it's not for the masses, even if it cost much less.
It's practical in that it's the first jetpack that can be flown for over a minute (half an hour, actually) and it runs on unleaded fuel. But the controls require true expertise and intense focus--this isn't the Segway of the sky. I'd bet that you'd need at least the mandatory 15 hours of flight school to feel comfortable flying alone. And to go higher into the air, you'd probably want plenty of 10-foot field-testing first.
But that's not to say the jetpack is not great. To borrow a line from Ferris Bueller: "It is so choice. If you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up." And many ultralight enthusiasts probably will.
Though maybe even more importantly, it's a triumph of the inventor in days when software programs design our next wave of processors. In an era when the future brings ethereal promises of microscopic transistors and invisible wireless data, the Martin Jetpack is a glorious homage to the mechanical and a reminder that engineers still have a lot of tinkering left to do--much of it with actual engines.

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
dsenier
Posted 2:59 AM 5/8/08
This is what happens when egg heads find billionaires to find their ideas. If this is an initial development on the way to the real thing I applaud them. If this is the final product, just cut the losses and get out now.
dsenier
hu_hu_cool
Posted 2:54 AM 5/8/08
Sell gizmodo and buy one! or maybe a few.....
hu_hu_cool
SGlick1980
Posted 2:53 AM 5/8/08
Someone call the Mythbusters and tell them they screwed up.
SGlick1980
Hectorvex
Posted 2:51 AM 5/8/08
You could literally "pick up" chicks in that thing. Then fly them off to your cave in the mountains.
Hectorvex
Jakelshark
Posted 2:48 AM 5/8/08
I need to buy one of those kits with the instructions now...
Jakelshark
csgoat
Posted 2:48 AM 5/8/08
anybody out there want to loan me 100k?
csgoat
tamoko
Posted 2:46 AM 5/8/08
Damn that would be a sweet ride... I especially like the "sold" sticker on the back.
tamoko
GeekyNerdGuy
Posted 2:40 AM 5/8/08
This would be great for commuting in Houston!
GeekyNerdGuy
Git Em SteveDave is a poor substitute for LindsayJoy
Posted 2:40 AM 5/8/08
Looks like you had your suicide Nikes on. Coincidence?
Git Em SteveDave is a poor substitute for LindsayJoy
92BuickLeSabre
Posted 2:39 AM 5/8/08
Bravo you SOB.
92BuickLeSabre
ALT
Posted 2:39 AM 5/8/08
What an insane day! I don't think I could have imagined a more detailed account.
ALT
doobiebros2two
Posted 2:38 AM 5/8/08
Oh no way.
Thats a lot of planes at one place.
Hey is that a man with a jet pack?
doobiebros2two
Ariel_Wollinger
Posted 2:37 AM 5/8/08
I want to try it now!!! damn you!
Ariel_Wollinger
strider_mt2k
Posted 2:33 AM 5/8/08
You magnificent bastard.
strider_mt2k
Icantthinkofsomethingwitty
Posted 3:25 AM 5/8/08
@snitch29: Sure, it flies. the people "holding the thing while it lifts up like 4 feet of[sic] the ground" are trying to prevent it from going crazy/too high.
Icantthinkofsomethingwitty
snitch29
Posted 3:22 AM 5/8/08
They keep saying this thing flies but all the pictures and videos i see, there's like 4 guys holding the thing while it lifts up like 4 feet of the ground, WTF, does it fly or not?????
snitch29
dingus
Posted 3:21 AM 5/8/08
I think you missed an ideal moment to quote Tony Stark.
dingus
Icantthinkofsomethingwitty
Posted 3:20 AM 5/8/08
Is this it? [www.break.com]
Icantthinkofsomethingwitty
garzo
Posted 3:13 AM 5/8/08
Just Beautiful...
garzo
nutbastard
Posted 3:12 AM 5/8/08
lucky son of a bitch.
your impractical conveyance > my impractical conveyance (segway)
nutbastard
GeekyNerdGuy
Posted 3:11 AM 5/8/08
@Muttonchops: No kidding. I mean, Princess Peach can hover all day ...
GeekyNerdGuy
WildWon
Posted 3:09 AM 5/8/08
@Muttonchops: Yea, most people can jump higher, but i haven't seen anyone in person... let along gotten to do it myself... jump 2 feet and stay there.
Faced.
WildWon
Muttonchops
Posted 3:06 AM 5/8/08
Most people can jump higher. Get back to me when there's video of someone doing a fly by at 100 feet. This whole "hover 2 feet off the ground" thing is non-news.
Muttonchops
Yznel
Posted 3:05 AM 5/8/08
Great post, Mark!
Yznel
SigmundTheSeaMonster
Posted 3:05 AM 5/8/08
The perfect Hanes commercial...
SigmundTheSeaMonster
bobdobbs
Posted 3:50 AM 5/8/08
Who wouldn't rather blow $100K on this instead of a Tesla?
bobdobbs
sqeakytoy of the apocalypse
Posted 3:45 AM 5/8/08
biiiiiiiiiiiiig gopher...
sqeakytoy of the apocalypse
xxjudgmentxx
Posted 3:45 AM 5/8/08
One thing's for sure...I live in WISCONSIN not "WISCONSON".
BTW EAA AirVenture is awesome.
xxjudgmentxx
GeekyNerdGuy
Posted 3:41 AM 5/8/08
Man, there are some serious Debbie Downers in this thread. Mark goes and freaking tests a jetpack, and all you guys can say is "that's not flying" as if you've ever flown a jetpack yourselves.
Personally, I think it's awesome -- except for the part of the article where Mark admits his wrists are too limp to fit the controls properly.
GeekyNerdGuy
socalboomer
Posted 3:40 AM 5/8/08
I have a strange feeling that someone who was familiar with the machine, and who could stay in it without dumping their load (ROFL!!! :D ) very likely DID fly around for a decent amount of time.
But you naysayers are missing the point. They took a complete newbie (to flying a jetpack - aren't we all), stuck him in this contraption, and had him IN THE AIR. . . without a ton of training, without orientaton, blah blah blah.
They strapped a big-ass motor on his back, with a couple of ducted fans, and slapped him in the ass and he was airborne.
whew.
socalboomer
Luizzle
Posted 3:39 AM 5/8/08
So I don't know if I'm more jealous of you for getting to fly or of Hugh Hefner..
Luizzle
snitch29
Posted 3:38 AM 5/8/08
Dude, how can they say this thing can reach a cruising altitude of 8000 feet if that piece of ssssssssssht can't even reach 3 feet and be stable for 2 seconds
snitch29
sqeakytoy of the apocalypse
Posted 3:38 AM 5/8/08
I want one of these sooooooo bad. I mean the positives to getting this into production are so significant for all facets of the world as we know it. First, bring some jobs home to make it. Second, mass production to put them in reach of everyone. Third, population control/genetic water change in the gene pool. Get rid of all the idiots that would send themselves zipping willy-nilly into ceiling and overpasses. Then last, all the funeral homes and related businesses will get a huge boost in business. Everyone benefits. Win win win win win.
sqeakytoy of the apocalypse
Mark Wilson
Posted 3:36 AM 5/8/08
@snitch29: Hey, I kinda thought the same thing going in. Take my account for what you will, but there's also some math to keep in mind:
I'm 190lbs. This pack is 250lbs. That puts the combined weight at somewhere around 450lbs, and the three guys holding on around me are certainly not lifting over 100lbs apiece.
Mark Wilson
newgalactic
Posted 3:32 AM 5/8/08
Flying > floating 2ft off the ground.
When it can fly in a stable manner for more then 20 minutes, I'll be impressed. So far he's replicated those skydiving testing fans that have people floating for 20 to 30 minutes. But are they really "flying", that's a stretch. When he can maneuver accurately, then he's flying. Until then, he's floating.
newgalactic
The_Triton
Posted 3:31 AM 5/8/08
GREAT POST!!!!!
It's been a long time since one of you Giz guys put up somehthing this noteworthy on the site.
applause!!!
The_Triton
maven2k
Posted 4:10 AM 5/8/08
Great story all around. I laughed out loud several times and it was a really good read, bravo!
maven2k
Xavoc
Posted 4:08 AM 5/8/08
@Muttonchops: People are not capable of jumping and hovering. Let alone staying off of the ground for 15 seconds. Considering this is a test flight performed by someone who hasn't ever used the contraption before, you really should be more impressed.
Or, are you capable of hovering w/out input from Taco Bell?
Xavoc
Log1c
Posted 4:08 AM 5/8/08
Whore.
I still really want to see this thing do more than 2 feet off the ground. But still awesome.
I'm disappointed I didn't check this out when I was there.
Log1c
Sora57
Posted 4:07 AM 5/8/08
That sounds really cool, Mark. I would have crapped my pants. Actually, I did while reading this. Gotta go now.
Sora57
monkeybars
Posted 4:07 AM 5/8/08
@snitch29: Sounds like it was stable. And it was flying stable for 15 seconds. Did you read this, or just look at the pictures?
monkeybars
monkeybars
Posted 4:05 AM 5/8/08
@newgalactic: Dude, did you even read it? Obviously they aren't gonna strap some journalist into it and say "hey, go crazy!"
Everyone's so damn depressing. Sorry your life isn't going how you wanted it to, but this is exciting, whether you want to admit it or not.
monkeybars
newgalactic
Posted 4:04 AM 5/8/08
Steps to reproduce (on a smaller scale):
1. Obtain a bottle rocket, preferably the kind with whistle report.
2. Remove all of the red stick.
3. With scotch tape, attach your favorite green army man. The one crawling on his belly is long and slender, possibly more aerodynamic.
4. Light bottle rocket while doing your best to shield your eyes.
newgalactic
GeekyNerdGuy
Posted 4:01 AM 5/8/08
@snitch29: There's a Mexican company that sells copies of those packs. Unfortunately they only fly for 30 seconds.
GeekyNerdGuy
Jimbuck
Posted 3:59 AM 5/8/08
@GeekyNerdGuy: I agree with you. Enough out of you skeptics! I smell Envy, it smells similar to Jealousy...
Jimbuck
EBone
Posted 3:59 AM 5/8/08
@Luizzle: Awsomely cool. But you should envy Hef more. Although I'm not certain my "flight" with one of his gals would last longer than 15 seconds either...
EBone
snitch29
Posted 3:58 AM 5/8/08
@Mark Wilson: Dude i hope they invite you back when they can get it working 100%, it's just that i was hoping to see someone taking off in this thing and reaching at least 100 feet in it, kind of what the old jet pack bell helicopter company use to make
snitch29
beetlebailey
Posted 3:53 AM 5/8/08
I went to Oshkosh in 07. Flying in there in a general aviation aircraft is like nothing else. The pucker factor is nice and high, but the pay off of being at the Mecca of American aviation is priceless. Camping out next to a plane, riding in an old Bell 47, seeing Bob Hoover, and having what is possibly the best soft serve ice cream on the planet. I cant wait to go again in the future.
beetlebailey
funkydude101
Posted 3:53 AM 5/8/08
Cool, but Tony Stark made one in a few weeks in his basement- and the jets were in his feet and hands.
funkydude101
Elaine Chow
Posted 4:41 AM 5/8/08
awesome feature, Mark! Love the note you left on. :D
Elaine Chow
carvelo
Posted 4:34 AM 5/8/08
@newgalactic: This is more of a personal helicopter type thing than a jetpack. I think something like this could make it, but you're right, you probably won't be flying around like Superman with this thing...think helicopter :)
I just hate it when people say this kind of thing is impossible.
carvelo
Xavoc
Posted 4:33 AM 5/8/08
@DustyButt: Likely they only have one operational prototype, and they're not wanting to seriously risk damaging it while they're still (admittedly so!) working out bugs and issues.
IE: It is relatively safe at this height for novice users.
Notice the commentary on the hud, and inability to read it, etc...
Xavoc
Hectorvex
Posted 4:30 AM 5/8/08
@newgalactic: I have to agree. My happy place is full of army men exploding 30 feet up in the air near a power line.
Hectorvex
Spkl
Posted 4:28 AM 5/8/08
great story.
i want it now...
eh, never will happen but i can (and will) dream.
Spkl
carvelo
Posted 4:27 AM 5/8/08
Awesome story! Wish I could have been strapped onto that thing myself, but you sure did a great job of putting us there mentally.
carvelo
newgalactic
Posted 4:25 AM 5/8/08
@monkeybars: How was my comment depressing? I've launched no less then 100 green army men into the atmosphere, and loved it each and every time. Personally, I thought that the imagery invoked one of the happiest moments in my life (and I assumed it would be true for others).
But getting back to the jet pack, it's a death trap. Forever bound to "early testing stages" for basic reasons. Simply put, it's too short. There is absolutely no stability on that thing and will never fly in a headfirst manner, while in it's current configuration. Am I proud of the creators, sure. Like young men determined to build the ultimate tree fort, they are at least getting outside and doing something (they just have a bigger budget). But is that thing a legitimate form of air-travel, heck no.
I'll admit I'm wrong when I see video of some experienced chap flying and maneuvering head-first through those inflatable pylons, like at the reno air races (or something similar). That would be "flying" in every sense.
newgalactic
DustyButt
Posted 4:25 AM 5/8/08
Nice story, and I wouldn't mind giving this thing a go... BUT
I call BS on this thing.
I mean, yes, it can do what it says, which is "lift people off the ground"... but, I throw the BS flag for lack of flying.
I've seen this thing four times, and every time it's with a "reporter" strapped in with 3-4 guys piled around it. One guy operates the throttle and the other three hold it steady as it lifts off for a few seconds. I wanna see this fly around under the pilot's/passenger's control and come in for a SAFE landing. Until then you can chalk this up to the same brand of snake oil as the SkyCar.
I know the reporter is there to generate interest, but I want to see one picture of the mysterious skilled pilot in flight to prove that it can be done, that's all. Just have the guy lift up 3-4 feet and move in any direction for 10 feet and land WITHOUT the assistants huddled about...that's all I'm asking. I just smell smoke and mirrors and a fantasy that's for sale. I flew helicopters and hovering takes some skill, and just looking at this tells me that it may just be unflyable.
I might be wrong... but I don't think so.
DustyButt
DustyButt
Posted 5:00 AM 5/8/08
@Xavoc: That's how experimental vehicles (air, sea, land) work. You make a working prototype (at least one) and you get at least ONE dude who knows how to operate it. How can they work out the bugs if they can't get atleast one guy to lift off of the ground unassisted?
Seriously, That thing is just two ducted fans with a safety harness bolted to it.
I'm not hating on it, I just think it doesn't and never will work as advertised.
IT'S PHONEY.
DustyButt
Ethan Halko!
Posted 4:47 AM 5/8/08
@snitch29: Did you even read the article? Or at least scan it to get the gist of what it was about? This is "An untrained person testing a prototype jetpack for 15 seconds" not "Use the prototype jetpack to it's full potential"
Anyone who doesn't think something like this is amazing clearly has too much excitement in their lives.
Ethan Halko!
russdanger
Posted 5:30 AM 5/8/08
Needs some flames airbrushed onto the cowls, or a coat of flat black and a Bat-Symbol...
russdanger
DustyButt
Posted 5:27 AM 5/8/08
I think what we want here is something that resembles "controlled flight" at ANY altitude. And the first requirement of flight is not having contact with the ground.
DustyButt
newgalactic
Posted 5:22 AM 5/8/08
@Shervyn: You might be right. But ask those same men and women who fly planes or choppers if there's a difference between floating 2 ft off the ground and their definition of flying. Head first is not a necessary requirement. But those "requirements" are most likely higher then what we saw demonstrated.
newgalactic
wiredwizard
Posted 5:21 AM 5/8/08
@SGlick1980: Not exactly. The test from Mythbusters was for build-it-yourself blueprints available off the 'Net, not a commercially built prototype.
wiredwizard
wiredwizard
Posted 5:19 AM 5/8/08
Within a year there'll be one sitting in the workshop over at M5 for Adam & Jamie to drool over & take for a spin.
wiredwizard
Shervyn
Posted 5:09 AM 5/8/08
@newgalactic: In what rule book does it say that in order for you to be flying you have to go head first? I think anyone who flies a plane or a chopper would disagree.
Shervyn
Faslane66
Posted 5:49 AM 5/8/08
@Jimbuck:
WORD!
Faslane66
Notch_Johnson
Posted 5:39 AM 5/8/08
That is a cool gizmo. I went last year and the true treasures are hearing Chuck Yager (1st to break the sound burrier), WWII Aces, Jim Lovell (played by Tom Hanks in Applo 13), Joe Engle (STS-2), and Steve Fossett a few months before his disapearence. Fossett holds the high altitude record for a glider. Of course Lovell holds the all time altitude and speed records and is know for saying "Houston, we have a problem."
Notch_Johnson
VideoVampire
Posted 5:35 AM 5/8/08
The only downside of it is that it wont fit into the trunk of an Astin-Martin
VideoVampire
MrBlahBlah
Posted 6:13 AM 5/8/08
wake me when someone hovers more than 5 ft above the ground...
MrBlahBlah
Ben Zvan
Posted 6:10 AM 5/8/08
I was impressed too. He looks like he could use some practice, but at least he didn't pull a Tony Stark and go ass-over-teakettle into the fence behind him.
The Bell Rocket Belt looks more practical except that it probably only has a few minutes of fuel. And is extremely loud. And always has a news crew following it around.
Ben Zvan
DustyButt
Posted 6:06 AM 5/8/08
@Ben Zvan: Oh Shit!
Doesn't look safe... but at least somebody can control it!
Good link!
DustyButt
CCM333
Posted 6:05 AM 5/8/08
You wrote 5 pages! I am sure as hell not reading 5 pages!
But I skimmed it and it said something about a jet pack, which are always cool, and then something about you flying which would be exhilarating... and something about Ferrari and children? Whatever. Have fun with your little gizmos... I WANT THEM but you get them... so not fair...
CCM333
johnrhopkins
Posted 6:02 AM 5/8/08
Mark, I'm glad you were able to make it out there. Great story. Thank you!
johnrhopkins
Ben Zvan
Posted 6:00 AM 5/8/08
For the haters, there's a video on the martinjetpack.com website of it going a good 5 feet into the air with spotters running along side. Obviously, this kind of thing can work and this one is in it's infancy.
+ Watch video
Ben Zvan
Ben Zvan
Posted 6:46 AM 5/8/08
@MrBlahBlah: I don't know how you got that star... Did you see the video?
Ben Zvan
JimboGizmo
Posted 6:44 AM 5/8/08
Awesome article; you are very brave. So who did you have to bribe to get the chance to fly this thing?
JimboGizmo
roflwaffles
Posted 6:39 AM 5/8/08
@MrBlahBlah:
*shove* you awake?
roflwaffles
Notch_Johnson
Posted 6:33 AM 5/8/08
@MrBlahBlah:
Wake up!!! I just ate 5 bean borittos.
Notch_Johnson
P3nnst8r has returned on the Graces of Brian Ashcraft
Posted 6:50 AM 5/8/08
Starscream lives!!
P3nnst8r has returned on the Graces of Brian Ashcraft
whiteknight
Posted 7:56 AM 5/8/08
HOLY FREAKING CRAP!!!! THIS IS FREAKING AWESOME!!! This is the first viable unique personal sustained hovering vehicle to be engineered, built, and tested successfully in like 50 some years! (I'm excluding SoloTrek because I haven't seen or heard from them in several years) By sustained I mean flights longer than 1 min, 30 secs. To respond to all the naysayers and those who cry foul: get out, try something new, and get a freaking imagination. For some of you that might begin with buying some tennis shoes and actually going outside. The reality is with something this new you need a brave soul that will learn to fly the thing and then find out what it can do. This has been true of all aviation history. Hell, we all had to learn to crawl, walk, run, skateboard, ride a bike, drive a car, etc. How many years did it take you to learn any or all of those skills?
Mr. Wilson, you are a lucky bastard! Thanks for sharing your little piece of euphoria with us!
whiteknight
StealthNinja
Posted 7:47 AM 5/8/08
So, it has a built in harness strapped to a backpack, that connects to the propulsion system for lift off; compared to having your feet resting on a step, and not being suspended in the air, except in flight like that Gillete razor commercial. LOL. But, it looks neet.
StealthNinja
godwhacker
Posted 9:47 AM 5/8/08
wilson, you lucky so and so
i will never live long enough, and/or have the dough for a cool air scooter like this
oh well, off to buy lottery tickets........
godwhacker
pri_them2
Posted 11:16 AM 5/8/08
For this thing to go commercial, two features must be included first.
1. A rocket deployed parachute that is triggered by altimeter reading. When the system detects free falling, the parachute will open.
2. The system must have a computer override on the rate of descend. If the pilot panicked and lost grip of the control, the machine should descend at a safe rate by itself. And if there is a power loss during the descend, the parachute should deploy.
By the look of it and how nervous the other two guys holding it down, you can easily tell this machine is still at the "suicide" grade.
pri_them2
MobileEMP
Posted 11:38 AM 5/8/08
Wilson, your account of jetpacking was so beautiful I just wept.
MobileEMP
Mr.Wilson
Posted 12:26 PM 5/8/08
Aren't you lucky! Love the way you described the experience, acrophobe or not, I'd think the idea of hovering about the place would win over me, and some of those guys would have to hang on for dear life as I send it up 8 feet and start swooping around!
Mr.Wilson
iCanhasLs2plz
Posted 12:55 PM 5/8/08
Video or ban!
iCanhasLs2plz
Bos'un's Mate
Posted 3:12 PM 5/8/08
Martin needs to chat with the boys at Stanford:
+ Watch video
Bos'un's Mate
-Core-
Posted 8:10 PM 5/8/08
Sounds extremely fun!
-Core-
Snicker
Posted 9:17 PM 5/8/08
Break.com says Mark is a 16-year old kid who apparently invented it, and it runs on water. Congrats, Mark! /sarcasm.
Seriously awesome video, though.
Snicker
ElCabong
Posted 1:23 AM 6/8/08
Sorry, I don't believe it. I only beleive in things I can touch and test personally. Untill then I must convice myself that this doesn't exist... AAAAAAAARRGGH! You lucky SOB! ME WANTS! ME WANTS!
ElCabong
gloveofpower
Posted 1:35 AM 6/8/08
heeeeeeeeell yeah! Now THAT's a gadget I can put my full support behind. Ever since I was a kid I wished I could have my own jetpack. If I ever reach a point in life where I could afford this, I'm so getting one!
gloveofpower
im.thatoneguy
Posted 3:11 AM 6/8/08
Now they need 100 piezo electric gyroscopes and two redundant laptop computers to maket his thing fly-by-wire. There's no reason a $3,000 system couldn't keep this thing idiot proof.
im.thatoneguy
trogam
Posted 4:03 AM 6/8/08
@ElCabong: Same...ME WANT NAO!
trogam
StealthNinja
Posted 5:05 AM 6/8/08
Well, you gotta check out the skycar by MOLLER.com, and it has the proppellers boxes for lift/ levatation; actually move and rotate to take flight. The U.S. Army signed a contract with SKY Car, and they actually built the Jetson's UFO car and a bunch of other models. But, same concept of a segway/ air skooter and jet pack or a Sky Car, they're all means of transportation!
Tchao.
StealthNinja
StealthNinja
Posted 4:58 AM 6/8/08
so have you seen the rocket pack on a hang glider with the parachute too, I guess that this is similar to that but as an air skooter. But, there is a video on you tube, about this subject that I saw on the news, and it was great man. Wow, what a creation, but only if it had morphing materials from MIT.
StealthNinja
knyghtryda
Posted 6:26 AM 6/8/08
Stage 2 or 3 of this thing should be folding/retractable wings. Then you'd have your own personal VTOL, and would probably get much better flight time to boot. As for the ballistic parachute... It needs to be much better than what available right now on the commercial market. I would wager to say it needs to be almost military grade ejection seat style parachutes. An ejection seat is almost guaranteed to work even if the plane is standing still. Now that won't be the case with this thing, but it definitely should work if its falling from say 20 or 30 feet, depending on your rate of descent.
knyghtryda
plinkfloyd
Posted 8:05 PM 5/8/08
Thanks for the detailed yet whimsical report. I have been searching daily since it was debuted at Oshkosh for a more detail oriented article. This one comes very close.
I feel sorry for the negative people who callously dismiss the significance of this new aircraft. Then they are permitted to publish their negativity on the internet. Shame on you!!!! It reminds me of the "early aviation era" when mentally myopic techno-ostriches scoffed at the airplane.
This jetpack development was essentially a simple "problem" of physics that has been waiting to be solved for many years. Now that is has been solved, undoubtedly the market will see refinements in the concept, power plants, fly-by-wire gyro control systems,and variants of the original. Three "Hip Hip Hurrays" to Mr. Martin. YOU DID IT!
Orville "Lee" Floyd III (developer of the Para-Cycle, world's first flying bike)
plinkfloyd
Cessna88
Posted 11:07 AM 5/8/08
Having 2 men hold you 2 feet in the air is not exactly what I call flying.
Cessna88
Cessna88
Posted 11:03 AM 5/8/08
This "Jet Pack" Prototype has not ever been flown for more than 5 minutes or above 6 feet off the ground. It in theory flies like a helicopter and can never exceed a 60 degree bank so you can't actually fly like superman. It was developed by a man in his spare time in his garage and not by a big corporation with lots of money invested. It looks and sounds like someone took a 15K hovercraft and reshaped it and now are trying to sell it for 100k. If and when this is perfected so you can do loops in the sky I would be very interested in reading about/seeing it and it would deserve attention but as of now it does not. It is getting way too much attention by the media and is not ready for production. I wasted my time waiting at the unveiling of it expecting a real jet pack and am sick of seeing so many articles about it as it is noting but a homemade helicopter that cant even fly out of ground effect safely.
Cessna88
yeagermeister
Posted 8:37 AM 5/8/08
Ahhhh... the spirit of Richard Pearse lives on.
Proud to be a New Zealander. GO KIWI!
To all you negative types... If you don't try, you'll NEVER succeed.
yeagermeister
miller_time
Posted 8:28 AM 5/8/08
I saw this online last week... I go to school in Oshkosh...went to Airventure on Saturday...and completely forgot to look for this! Was it on display after the flight? On another note, Terrafugia's Transition was pretty damn sweet.
miller_time
yeagermeister
Posted 7:48 AM 5/8/08
Ahhh... the spirit of Richard Pearse lives on!
Proud to be a New Zealander. GO KIWI!
yeagermeister
PrimaveraMedea
Posted 6:44 AM 5/8/08
Anyone who wants to see slightly more extensive tests (still six feet altitude max) without two guys holding on to the side bars, look at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58YXSwiyRco http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAsommyN2gQ The reason that they are holding on to it is that they do not want to risk it running into the crowds, and they had to swap pilots at the last minute: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BinmFVJM1IQ This video mentions that they had planned a more impressive demonstration flight, but had to change: http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=jet-pack&sitesearch=#q=jet-pack%20martin&sitesearch=&start=40 I do not understand people who say that it won't work, when it has clearly been demonstrated to work. Yes, two ducted fans pointing vertically is unstable, but the segway is fundamentally unstable too (mechanically), without the complex control system that controls it. The centre of gravity of this jetpack is below the ducts, so flipping it upside down is going to take real talent. The rest (e.g., horizontal motion) can be stabilized using appropriate sensors and a control system. Hans
PrimaveraMedea
digicatz
Posted 6:19 AM 5/8/08
test
digicatz
digicatz
Posted 6:07 AM 5/8/08
Why are my comments just going away when I click post??
digicatz
digicatz
Posted 5:29 AM 5/8/08
thats weird where did my comment go??
digicatz
digicatz
Posted 5:27 AM 5/8/08
You guys are missing the point, this will never be a personal transport, it would how ever be perfect for military recon, and search and rescue in areas with no roads, where land vehicles and equipment5 cant be moved easily. You can tell by the design it is not meant for horizontal flight. The engineering and aerodynamics would be entirely different. Much like the aero car company, that makes the flying cars that look like they are from the jetsons. Except those would be perfect for police and Ambulences, / emergency rescue opps, etc. And that company was working on one man flying platforms for the miltary for recon ops.
digicatz
miller_time
Posted 4:54 AM 5/8/08
So I read about this last week...I go to school in Oshkosh...went to Airventure...completely forgot to look for this! Was it on display for the rest of the week? On a side note, the Terrafugia Transition was awesome.
miller_time
That One Guy..
Posted 3:08 AM 5/8/08
@hu_hu_cool:
Perhaps not JUST Gizmodo.. but that would definitely give you enough of a head start to sell blood and semen for the rest!
That One Guy..