Robots
British Army Competition Yields Bomb-Dropping, Hi-Def Video Taking, Unfortunately Noisy Flying Robot
Posted by Gizmodo US Edition at 4:00 AM on August 17, 2008
One of the front runners of an ongoing British Army-sponsored competition for new military technology is this miniature spaceship-looking thing, which is designed to inconspicuously drop bombs and listening devices behind enemy lines. The external blade-less shape allows the machine to enter buildings through windows or doors, and an HD camera feed lets it double as a surveillance bot.
The Fenstar was built by Team MIRA, which includes students from England-based Warwick University and the Royal Grammar School Guildford. The British Ministry of Defence has already praised the innovation, pointing out that an aircraft that can "Look over walls or into compounds in Afghanistan will prove a real asset to the troops. The only problem so far is figuring out a way to minimise noise. Because, really, what good is a spy when everyone can hear it coming? That's some Get Smart tomfoolery. [Telegraph UK via Geekologie]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
dead_red_eyes
Posted 7:51 AM 17/8/08
City 17, here we come.
(Half Life 2 reference for those who don't know)
dead_red_eyes
Kevin
Posted 7:16 AM 17/8/08
combine the above statement with the fact that electromagnetic anti-gravity engines are round along with pointy tops and bottoms (read. VERY UFO-like) and it IS a very efficient and purposeful shape
Kevin
Git Em SteveDave displays attention-grabbing vanity
Posted 6:30 AM 17/8/08
@jrghoull: Well, you need to design a vehicle that hovers. OK, so it needs a propeller. Now it needs a tail rotor. Well, we want it to go into tight spaces, so we can't have a tail rotor. OK, lets use counter spinning rotors. Since we want it to go into tight spaces, we can't have an exposed rotor, so lets put guards around it. And since having a rotor on top isn't preferable when entering spaces, lets move it to the center. So we now have a craft surrounding a center mounted rotor. We need a shape for the total craft which utilizes the most surface area for the smallest shape, is aerodynamic, and eliminates corners or other things sticking out of it. I think we come up with a circular craft. I think this vehicle is just natural progression, not inspired by people's UFO fantasies which were spawned from sightings of test aircraft.
Git Em SteveDave displays attention-grabbing vanity
hatboysam
Posted 6:28 AM 17/8/08
@e-friend: Quite
hatboysam
Dice
Posted 6:12 AM 17/8/08
That is so sweet its a hovering dinner plate
Dice
jrghoull
Posted 5:56 AM 17/8/08
you know i swear to god we wouldnt have a fraction of these stupid looking "round planes" if it weren't for the whole ufo phenomenon. Why did the first plane have the wings they way they were and the propeller designed the way it was? because it HAD to be that way. everything made sense and everything was designed to do what it did...it was not made up to be something it wasnt.
if the basic UFO designs ever turn out in the to be real, and that spaceships in the way way future take on a similar design, then it will be because it makes the most sense to, it wont be because they are trying to make it look like something it's not.
this is a good example. its not a futuristic spaceship, its a helicopter designed to sorta move around and look like a spaceship. it should look like a helicopter, but instead it looks like something out of a grainy film that gets sent to sightings. why? because people are silly.
moral of the story; design things based on how they should be, not on what you wish they were.
jrghoull
Git Em SteveDave displays attention-grabbing vanity
Posted 5:10 AM 17/8/08
@Purple Dave: Actually, for battle, they are going to attach a full-length ball gown covered in sequins. The idea is to blind your opponent with luxury.
Git Em SteveDave displays attention-grabbing vanity
Mith
Posted 5:09 AM 17/8/08
This reminds me of the CYPHERS in Metal Gear Solid 2..
I kinda wanna shoot at one with my SOCOM.. if I had one..
Mith
Git Em SteveDave displays attention-grabbing vanity
Posted 5:08 AM 17/8/08
How about white noise generators?
Git Em SteveDave displays attention-grabbing vanity
Elaine Chow
Posted 5:01 AM 17/8/08
oops, guess i'm not very brit after all. :P spelling fixed. I smrt I sware!
Elaine Chow
seamustry
Posted 4:53 AM 17/8/08
Can I get that at Hobbytown USA?
seamustry
e-friend
Posted 4:44 AM 17/8/08
The lack of video is disappointing.
e-friend
Purple Dave
Posted 4:27 AM 17/8/08
Brit, Britir, Britist?
Anyways, I hope the yellow color is just for the prototyping phase, as that'll be all kinds of conspicuous in a real wartime situation.
Purple Dave
SlinkyDink
Posted 4:12 AM 17/8/08
No, I am. Cheerio!
SlinkyDink
Collins1
Posted 4:08 AM 17/8/08
No, I'm Britest!
Collins1
jcrockerman
Posted 4:05 AM 17/8/08
WHOA...Metal Gear Sentinels!
jcrockerman
Desmondia
Posted 10:56 AM 17/8/08
@jcrockerman: That was my first thought.
Desmondia
Desmondia
Posted 10:56 AM 17/8/08
@dead_red_eyes: I got it.
Desmondia
burningsensation
Posted 12:46 PM 17/8/08
Maybe it's friendly, like in Flubber with Robin Williams.
burningsensation
Purple Dave
Posted 3:58 PM 17/8/08
@jrghoull:
I thought that bit was explained by the whole "The external blade-less shape allows the machine to enter buildings through windows or doors" bit. You know, because it prevents the blades from smacking into door frames, or cutting down loverly flower arrangements (just because they're there to kill you doesn't mean they have to be _monsters_).
Purple Dave
cowboyshootist
Posted 8:59 PM 17/8/08
@jrghoull:
Are you smoking crack? I suppose you think a jet fighter should be designed like a bi-plane or something?
The reason things are designed the way they are is due to the current technology available. Spaceships come from beings who are far advanced in technology that we haven't even dreamt of yet. The reason they are circular is probably due to the need to create an artificial gravity.
What should a spy drone look like? Should a house look like a cracker box with a pitched roof or can it look like the architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright? Does a car have to look like a Model-T or can it look like a Ferrari?
Designs can be asthetically pleasing as well as funtional although some things are pretty much locked into a particular shape. For example, a baseball bat that looks like a spatula probably wouldn't be very functional.
cowboyshootist
Gann
Posted 1:14 AM 18/8/08
@jrghoull: Everybody knows that real ufos are pyramid shaped.
Gann
MattTheRogue
Posted 4:14 AM 17/8/08
I wonder where the camera is located on the device. If it's on the underside, they can't park it and let it spy. If it is on the side, they can't get images from a fly-by. Hmmm ...
MattTheRogue