Online

Photoshop Disasters Hurt Our Eyes Beyond Repair

Posted by Jesus Diaz at 1:00 AM on July 25, 2008

I'm not a Photoshop wizard. I know I do plenty of photobotching myself--guilty as charged, your honour--but unlike these brilliant Photoshop Disasters, I've to do mine in a few minutes in order to publish news on time, and they don't get published in ads, packages, or magazines. My favourite from the gallery: the frontal shot of a model wearing a pearl g-string (which even while it shows no genitals whatsoever and is from Amazon.com, could be considered NSFW by many.) Update: how could I forgot the worst Microsoft ad ever? Added.


 

Seriously, I love pearl g-strings, but that sex-less editing almost took my fetish away. How can anyone use the infinite power of this software to create this crap--then spend thousands of dollars publishing it in magazine covers, catalogs, product packaging, and online shops--is beyond me. Specially knowing that any of your Photobotch works have 100 times the quality of these commercial pieces. [Photoshop Disasters]

Tags: crap | nsfw | online | photoshop | wrongmodo

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)

There are currently no AU comments for this post.

Post Your Comment

Gizmodo Australia moderates comments to avoid spam and abuse. We're looking for comments that are interesting, substantial and/or highly amusing. HTML is not accepted.

You must supply a name and your email address.