Design
Doha, Qatar: A Future City as Envisioned by Syd Mead
Posted by Sean Fallon at 6:30 AM on June 25, 2008
You may know "futurist" Syd Mead from his design work on geek friendly movies like Blade Runner, Tron and Aliens--but in his most recent work he envisions a future city by the name of Doha, Qatar. Naturally, his work speaks for itself, but I must admit that it stands in stark contrast to the bleak world of Blade Runner. Maybe he has become more optimistic as the years have passed. Oh, also, Joel's interviewing Syd soon and I'm sure if you have questions, he'll ask them for you. [Syd Mead via PSFK via Treehugger via Boing Boing Gadgets]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
92BuickLeSabre
Posted 8:48 AM 25/6/08
@VideoVampire: Man, that just bums me out. I really hope you don't live in SF, cause anyone who is lucky enough to live there but feels that way about it would be such a waste.
@BiZarRroBALlmeR: While there is noooo question that the gulf nations still want to make their money off of oil, most of them have already diversified into the global real estate market, global stock indexes, capital financing, etc. that when the time comes that the oil is gone, they will be no worse off than any of the other ridiculously rich people in the world.
92BuickLeSabre
pharago
Posted 8:47 AM 25/6/08
@BiZarRroBALlmeR: no it wont because it will cost 500$ a barrel, did you think they will pay for the city? no, we will, we are already
pharago
nutbastard
Posted 8:45 AM 25/6/08
WHY does every futurist assume that eccentric architecture is going to be all the rage - the less practical the building shape, the more futurey it is, like, "Hey, this is the future... you can tell because our buildings are large spheres stacked on small spheres with dodecahedron windows made of transparent aluminum, and pollution is supposedly really bad, despite the bright blue sky and ocean."
nutbastard
dontforget
Posted 8:41 AM 25/6/08
@carnegiesMellons: as much as i want to agree with you, that sail building is being built in dubai, as well as that twisty building, well that's actually in a couple of cities (lil difference) those airship are being planed, and, well i don't know what's up with those martini glasses.
dontforget
berribrand
Posted 8:24 AM 25/6/08
@VideoVampire: That's why the parks are elevated above the smoldering ruins of the "lower city." The plants can only survive above the pollution layer.
This looks kinda like Midgar to me (FFVII reference).
berribrand
BiZarRroBALlmeR
Posted 8:23 AM 25/6/08
won't their oil have run out by then?
BiZarRroBALlmeR
Noobs-R-Us
Posted 8:05 AM 25/6/08
Also, I don't see how they will be able to keep Al-Qaeda away? They should paint a huge bullseye in the middle of the city.
Noobs-R-Us
redbearded
Posted 8:02 AM 25/6/08
Amen to that! @VideoVampire:
redbearded
carnegiesMellons
Posted 8:00 AM 25/6/08
That's the dumbest thing I've ever seen. I'm going to get a job as one of these conceptual future artists and draw scenes from the Jetsons. Im ganna blow peoples socks off with my crazy futuristic imagination!!!! Then get paid for it. (PS I'm not cynical, but c'mon... I think the future is ganna be a LOT cooler than THAT!)
carnegiesMellons
Kaiser-Machead's Chips Ahoy!
Posted 7:53 AM 25/6/08
@VideoVampire: Sometimes it's nice to simply forget the blemishes and take pleasure in viewing the big picture.
Kaiser-Machead's Chips Ahoy!
VideoVampire
Posted 7:45 AM 25/6/08
You know how beautiful San Francisco looks from a vantage point like the one shown? Its all sparkling and lights and cool looking structures, but when you get on the ground in that city or almost any other for that matter, it is a shithole, it stinks, the bums shit in the street you cant stop anywhere with out smelling the urine of a thousand scumbags. So my questuion is, since this city looks REALLY GREAT from "that vantage point" it is even worse to the same degree on the ground?
VideoVampire
dontforget
Posted 7:45 AM 25/6/08
@dontforget: don't forget to use the reply button.
"o ya dude, you're right that was for behavin:"
dontforget
dontforget
Posted 7:42 AM 25/6/08
you should read giz more, [gizmodo.com] or not what do i know?
dontforget
redbearded
Posted 7:40 AM 25/6/08
kOtic:
its a "vision" of the future not an actual design. Why do you have to go and poop on it with your pragmatism?
"I must admit that it stands in stark contrast to the bleak world of Blade Runner."
I have a few of Syd Mead's books and I can tell you that dark and gloomy is NOT what his vision of the future looks like. He's always had a sunny and optimistic perspective. I would give Ridley Scott credit for the bleak look of Blade Runner. It was his art direction in collaboration with Syd Mead that made the film look the way it did. Watch the documentary that came in the recent 4 DVD box set and check out some of Syd Mead's books. They're pretty inspiring.
redbearded
behavin
Posted 7:29 AM 25/6/08
Why is it that all of these futuristic designs always have giant things floating around in the sky? Are blimp rides going to become the new tourist-y thing to do in the future?
behavin
Kaiser-Machead's Chips Ahoy!
Posted 7:28 AM 25/6/08
I adore Mead's work. I want giant whale ships. Now.
Kaiser-Machead's Chips Ahoy!
2001: A Space Odyssey
Posted 7:27 AM 25/6/08
@uberfu: yeah looney toons told me that we'd have that by 2000 and I'm a little disappointed that I dont have mine yet.
2001: A Space Odyssey
dontforget
Posted 7:25 AM 25/6/08
that's just a picture of Dubai.
dontforget
kOtic
Posted 7:19 AM 25/6/08
The thing with all these futuristic buildings is that, design-wise, they're gonna cost atleast double to build.
kOtic
Tank
Posted 7:12 AM 25/6/08
I hope our future is a cool blue world and not a burnt brown world that's 122 degrees outside.
Tank
92BuickLeSabre
Posted 7:10 AM 25/6/08
Or just more optimistic about the future of Qatar.
92BuickLeSabre
uberfu
Posted 7:09 AM 25/6/08
one small problem - still need to invent mass produced flying car_
uberfu
DeadWriter
Posted 9:55 AM 25/6/08
@Ednonymous: That is one of the dumbest thing I have seen printed here. Cheers to you for mixing it up.
On topic: I'll argue that this is in line with much of Syd Mead's, including Blade Runner. Objects in his worlds do more than one thing. A cooling tower may also have apartments. The green space on top the towers may also be part of a motion dampening system, windows transmit light and generate power, roads are emergency flood paths, etc...
DeadWriter
ripfire
Posted 9:54 AM 25/6/08
The only thing missing in this picture is the 1950s style family with the slogan on top "The Future is Now!".
ripfire
Ednonymous
Posted 9:32 AM 25/6/08
If the arabs don't smarten up with the oil prices, places like qatar may wind up looking more like lumpy sheets of brown & green glass.
Ednonymous
wild homes and gardens
Posted 8:59 AM 25/6/08
I don't get it. Why does Syd Mead have the Pentagon holding five martinis?
wild homes and gardens
TaitRT
Posted 8:58 AM 25/6/08
Those things look like the bubble arcos (is that what they were called?) from SimCity 2000.
TaitRT
Camperton
Posted 10:40 AM 25/6/08
@behavin:
hey, check this out
[www.dezeen.com]
Camperton
The Brain
Posted 11:32 AM 25/6/08
Could you do me a favor and ask him to dispel the myth that the AT-AT walkers, which were based on his models, were not actually inspired by Oakland's container cranes.
The Brain
Prions
Posted 11:08 AM 25/6/08
Yup giant parks in mid-air are the wave of the future.
Why..why! would anyone build something like that? There's no practical purpose, especially since there is still room on the surface so he can't be pulling a Coruscant.
Prions
tehdahl
Posted 12:18 PM 25/6/08
yeah, the only problem is all that shiny chrome.
and all those blind people with their skin being boiled by the massive reflections of our friend, The Sun, off said shiny chrome.
city of the future or City Of the Blind and Broiled?
tehdahl
MrHaroHaro
Posted 11:40 AM 25/6/08
I still haven't forgiven Syd Mead for the Turn A Gundam designs.
Just a thought for many of the comments: Many of the designs (by folks like Frank Gehry or Zaha Hadid to name the more popular ones) being built today would have been considered impractical by previous generations, maybe even some current critics. Sometimes cool factor just outweighs practicality, and I think that there is absolutely nothing wrong with that.
MrHaroHaro
skulldriveshaft
Posted 12:58 PM 25/6/08
@tehdahl: hasn't stopped any of the other skyscrapers around the world, which usually only reflect onto the top of other buildings surrounding them.
I bet those massive towers would be providing acres of shade, they look like they're very high.
skulldriveshaft
skulldriveshaft
Posted 12:55 PM 25/6/08
@nutbastard: it's always been the rage to have eccentric architecture, now it's just getting way more eccentric.
skulldriveshaft
skulldriveshaft
Posted 12:53 PM 25/6/08
@BiZarRroBALlmeR: Qatar is not based on a oil export economy.
skulldriveshaft
skulldriveshaft
Posted 12:52 PM 25/6/08
@Noobs-R-Us: what drugs have you been smoking?
skulldriveshaft
bailey_ca
Posted 1:45 PM 25/6/08
@GadgetPlay: "Not if the US begins to produce it as well."
You don't even need to! The current Canadian government is more than happy to just give you guys Alberta if you promise to stop hitting us with Newfoundland and asking us why we're hitting ourselves!
bailey_ca
tehdahl
Posted 1:33 PM 25/6/08
@skulldriveshaft:
hush!
you're raining on my fantasy!
;)
tehdahl
GadgetPlay
Posted 1:25 PM 25/6/08
@Tank: "and not a burnt brown world that's 122 degrees outside."
No reason to think that it will be.
@VideoVampire: "You know how beautiful San Francisco looks from a vantage point like the one shown?"
San Fran encourages bums and filth. I doubt that Qatar does.
@Noobs-R-Us: "Also, I don't see how they will be able to keep Al-Qaeda away"
Don't worry, we're in the process of kicking their collective ass. You're welcome, world.
@BiZarRroBALlmeR: "won't their oil have run out by then?"
No, not even close.
@pharago: "no it wont because it will cost 500$ a barrel"
Not if the US begins to produce it as well.
GadgetPlay
bailey_ca
Posted 1:14 PM 25/6/08
@nutbastard: Post-modern architecture was simply a warning shot: In the future, taste will be completely eradicated.
bailey_ca
92BuickLeSabre
Posted 2:22 PM 25/6/08
@GadgetPlay: Barring radical improvements in the efficiencies of extracting oil from "dry" beds, the U.S. simply doesn't have enough oil no matter where or how we drill domestically to make more than a few dollars per barrel difference in the "long" term. And we don't have the public or private infrastructure set up to make any difference in the short term.
92BuickLeSabre
oo0cyst0oo
Posted 4:54 PM 25/6/08
This whole thing reminds me of Oscar Niemeyer and Brasilia. The city below the beautiful architecture is less ideal- partiallh because of the futuristic city plans. (Everyone will have a car in the future- a lot of pedestrians die.) It's beautiful though. I wish more crazy cities ended up working that way i.e. not running out of money half way through and leaving building shells up everywhere.
oo0cyst0oo
olaf74
Posted 8:22 AM 25/6/08
"he envisions a future city by the name of Doha, Qatar."
As in.. you don't believe Doha exists already? Don't get out from the behind the soft glow of the CRT much, do we now? Time to expand the RSS feed reading beyond the tech sites...
"Doha is Qatar's largest city (and capital!), with over 80% of the nation's population residing in Doha or its surrounding suburbs, and is also the economic center of the country."
[en.wikipedia.org]
olaf74
GadgetPlay
Posted 12:50 AM 26/6/08
@92BuickLeSabre: That's why we should have been doing this a long time ago. ANWR might only have enough to make a few dollars difference (I don't necessarily believe that, just stating our intention to drill will bring futures down), not the entire U. S. and its coasts. Ten years from now people will be saying the same thing, unless we do it now.
GadgetPlay
Noobs-R-Us
Posted 12:37 AM 26/6/08
@skulldriveshaft: Huh? You mean you didn't know that Al-Qaeda only condone their brand of Sharia? In fact, anyone who adopts western "decadent" ways of doing things is automatically the enemy. Where have you been in the last 7 years? In a cave?
Noobs-R-Us
thedancingrogue
Posted 12:22 AM 26/6/08
@Prions: There is a practical purpose. It expands your available surface space allowing you to reuse the same acreage multiple times. You want your parks to be closer to the sunlight. Why not build them over a factory, which is over an underground freeway, which is over a subway system, which is over your water and sewage system, which would be over a subterranean power plant?
thedancingrogue
Ednonymous
Posted 4:41 AM 26/6/08
@DeadWriter: Just an observation of the type of emotion or reaction which tends to occur at this sort of extravagance which is potentially (please pardon the bad pun) fueled by $4/gallon gas prices?
You know the old saying... Opinions are like assh... etc... we all have one and the right to have one.
Cheers to you as well! :-)
@nutbastard: Don't forget the the hoverboards and conveyor sidewalks!
@dontforget: Sorry... I forgot what I was going to say.
@skulldriveshaft: qatar does not have an oil-based economy? Then the Wikipedia entry should be fixed. [en.wikipedia.org]
@everybody: Which one is the SUV drifting stadium?
Ednonymous
ScottKin
Posted 12:45 PM 26/6/08
@Tank: If your comments were about "Global Warming", you might be interested to know that when the Polar Ice melts sufficiently, it will cool the oceans enough to cause the Northern Hemisphere to plunge into a mini-Ice Age - so, instead of these 122F degree temperatures as daily high temperatures, you'll more than likely see 52F daily highs in the summer.
Think of it this way: when you drop an icecube into tap water, what happens? The ice melts and makes your drink colder. With the volume of ice that is predicted to melt from Iceland, Greenland and the Arctic Circle due to "Global Warming", the oceans could be cooled enough to cause oceanic air currents to cooled as wel, which could then cause any oceanic evaporation to fall as snow as far south as the 38th or even the 37th Parallel.
ScottKin