<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AMD Developing Low Power CPU for Tiny Cheap Laptops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/amd_developing_low_power_cpu_for_tiny_cheap_laptops-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/amd_developing_low_power_cpu_for_tiny_cheap_laptops-2/</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:35:38 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Electric Magnetic</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/amd_developing_low_power_cpu_for_tiny_cheap_laptops-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8943</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric Magnetic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/amd_developing_low_power_cpu_for_tiny_cheap_laptops-2.html#comment-8943</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;8W isn&#039;t suitable for the UMPC market unless they are planning on underclocking them, and look what happened on the EeePC701 - everyone clocked them back up to 900mhz and had serious heat issues. I had to mod my EeePC to run comfortably at that clock (and that was the manufactured clock speed).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway I made a great picture to go with this topic... check this&lt;br /&gt;
http://electricvagabonddownunder.blogspot.com/2008/06/amd-cries-up-and-atom.html&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8W isn&#8217;t suitable for the UMPC market unless they are planning on underclocking them, and look what happened on the EeePC701 &#8211; everyone clocked them back up to 900mhz and had serious heat issues. I had to mod my EeePC to run comfortably at that clock (and that was the manufactured clock speed).</p>
<p>Anyway I made a great picture to go with this topic&#8230; check this<br />
<a href="http://electricvagabonddownunder.blogspot.com/2008/06/amd-cries-up-and-atom.html" rel="nofollow">http://electricvagabonddownunder.blogspot.com/2008/06/amd-cries-up-and-atom.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adamnfish</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/amd_developing_low_power_cpu_for_tiny_cheap_laptops-2/comment-page-1/#comment-8942</link>
		<dc:creator>adamnfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2008/06/amd_developing_low_power_cpu_for_tiny_cheap_laptops-2.html#comment-8942</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&quot;Why don&#039;t they concentrate on making desktop processors that can actually compete with intel before trying to our them on the mobile market.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Intel started focusing on new mobile-oriented mobile processor architectures a few years back, which is when AMD started to compare favourably in the desktop space. A few years down the line and the R&amp;D they did has filtered up to the desktop chips and blown AMD out of the water.&lt;br /&gt;
It&#039;s no good getting Phenoms that are clocked a bit higher - AMD to take a step back and re-think their approach. Hopefully if they can innovate in the challenging portable market they&#039;ll be able to sort themselves out and rekindle the desktop competition we used to love...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Why don&#8217;t they concentrate on making desktop processors that can actually compete with intel before trying to our them on the mobile market.&#8221;</p>
<p>Intel started focusing on new mobile-oriented mobile processor architectures a few years back, which is when AMD started to compare favourably in the desktop space. A few years down the line and the R&#038;D they did has filtered up to the desktop chips and blown AMD out of the water.<br />
It&#8217;s no good getting Phenoms that are clocked a bit higher &#8211; AMD to take a step back and re-think their approach. Hopefully if they can innovate in the challenging portable market they&#8217;ll be able to sort themselves out and rekindle the desktop competition we used to love&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
