Peripherals
Laptop Bags Soon Welcome in Airports
Posted by Mark Wilson at 1:20 AM on May 28, 2008
While most of us have become fine-oiled machines in working our way through airport security without shoes, belts (and thereby sometimes pants), ripping one's laptop from its safehaven in your bag and placing it, cluckily, in an X-ray tray is never a pleasant experience. Luckily, the TSA has finally decided that laptop bags that meet certain provisions will be considered X-ray friendly.
But there had to be a catch...
The TSA is only releasing guidelines to manufacturers. The organisation is specifically not approving individual bags for use in their X-ray machines. In other words, many who buy "security-friendly" laptop bags may find themselves among the dirty looks of fellow travellers and TSA agents alike.
Then again, the luggage market has certainly played well with airports when it comes to carry-on baggage. But that's just a question of dimensions that can be easily simulated in any warehouse condition, not X-ray interference.
Current prototypes resemble a clamshell that can be opened and laid flat for inspection. Such a design allows the laptop to be stored in one compartment completely isolated from papers, cords or any other objects that might complicate the scan. In other words, it closely mimics the way laptops are inspected now, save for a small bit of fabric.
We'll be interested to see just how practical (i.e. padded) these cases are. Hopefully travel really will get a little bit easier. [USAToday via Consumerist][Image: Nick Veasey]
Tags: accessories | airports | bags | gadgets | laptops | peripherals | travel

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
Pony99CA
Posted 4:28 AM 29/5/08
@ps61318 & Monty. Part of the problem may be Monty's misuse of "The horse left the barn" (or stable) saying. It doesn't mean that there's no more threat, it means that there's nothing you can do any longer because the threat is out there already.
For example, if some company invented a microbe that turned out to be deadly, it accidentally got released and then the company tried to put security in place to prevent the release, that would be the time to say the horse had already left the barn.
In this case, you could argue that the security measures are keeping the horse in the barn. If you need a metaphor, Monty probably meant that the hijacking fat lady had already sung.
Personally, I think the best way to prevent hijacking is to give everybody knives. Of course, that would probably just make air rage worse....
Regarding shipping bags ahead of time, I saw a news report last year (I think) about services that specialize in doing just that.
Pony99CA
ps61318
Posted 3:43 AM 29/5/08
@Monty: I guess I just don't understand your original assertion. There was a ca. 20-year lull between the peak of skyjacking and 9/11. That doesn't mean that scheming and attempting and planning etc. all went away. I state only that "the horse has left the stable" is too dismissive - we need to continue to be vigilant because the horse will otherwise reappear.
Furthermore, it is because we are vigilant that more incidences haven't occurred. This is reminiscent of Y2K - there was no major upheaval because of the prevention that took place. That doesn't mean there wasn't an issue.
If we let our guard down and ascribe to the belief that "no one will try THAT again; that would be crazy!" then we are gonna get burned.
ps61318
Monty
Posted 2:23 PM 28/5/08
@ps61318:
I clearly am out of touch with reality, so help fill me in:
How many airline hijackings have happened since 9/11 in the world? Since the 'terrorists' discovered you can use an airplane as a bomb, how many times has that been done since in the world? Based on the sarcasm, I assume this is happening all of the time and I just never read about it in the papers.
Monty
nogoodnamesleft
Posted 1:29 PM 28/5/08
Not to start a flame war, but give it a rest guys... I work for TSA and it is not that bad. I know some of the procedures in place seem strange..but believe me, they are there for a reason. Every time some new rule comes down the pike it's because some idiot has tried to do something stupid, was caught, and procedures were changed or adapted because of it.
It's funny, because when foreign travelers come through US checkpoints they are (mostly) VERY compliant and understanding, they are used to much worse screening at home and appreciate that someone is looking out for their safety.
It's a hard job, the stress level is high (how would you like to know you missed a bomb that killed 100's of people) and public appreciation is low. Everyone I have met in TSA has been a professional and cares about what they do. Walk a mile in their shoes before you judge.
And yes, I do read the TSA blog...some complaints are valid, a lot are not.
nogoodnamesleft
bandit
Posted 5:53 AM 28/5/08
Can anybody tell me what's so bad about having the laptop in the bag? Everything else is in the bag or my suitcase, so why the concern about a fabric bag?
bandit
benenglish
Posted 5:24 AM 28/5/08
@Shai: Man, I'm sorry to hear about that. I fly with firearms occasionally and I've always felt good about the notion that my bags get extra attention. Every time I hear about lost guns, I cringe.
benenglish
berribrand
Posted 4:56 AM 28/5/08
@regexp: I love how in Mexico, you press a magic button and if it randomly goes off, you get checked.
berribrand
berribrand
Posted 4:54 AM 28/5/08
Not everyone has this down, like that women in front of me at the Boston airport who packed away her laptop away in her suitcase, buried under her skid-marked panties trying to take it out with her left hand while tripping over herself trying to take off her shoes with her right hand leaving a 2 minute gap between her and the next person because all her flailing around would injury anyone attempting to go in front of her...
berribrand
Shai
Posted 4:32 AM 28/5/08
I've gotten my luggage delayed so many times that I'm seriously considering carrying it all on. On one trip they lost 3 firearms for about 4 days.
Shai
szrimaging
Posted 4:30 AM 28/5/08
Half of TSA's job is to make you FEEL safe. By having the pointless security procedures (some are pointless, some are not) they hope to make you THINK that you are safe.
szrimaging
ripfire4
Posted 3:58 AM 28/5/08
@jpitsch:
1. You're suppose to put your shoes through the xray machine.
2. If you haven't notice everyone else in front of you in the line removing their shoes, then I suggest you put down that PSP or DS and pay more attention to what's going on. Trust me, it might even save you from being crushed by a helicopter.
ripfire4
That_Eagle_Scout!
Posted 3:40 AM 28/5/08
@regexp: true that all in all TSA isn't that bad....I think the need to bump up their job requirements, and get some of these brain dead scanners outta there I am tired of them throwing my damn laptop around like its just a file folder or something jeez......
That_Eagle_Scout!
jpitsch
Posted 3:32 AM 28/5/08
They tell me to take off my shoes every time I walk through the metal detector and I have shoes with no metal in them. TSA workers for the most part are a bunch of "roundmouths".
jpitsch
Purple Dave
Posted 3:32 AM 28/5/08
@xint:
Sure. No lost baggage. Lost packages. There's always lost packages.
Purple Dave
regexp
Posted 3:11 AM 28/5/08
Usually the people that say the airports are worse are usually the people that are bad travelers anyways. All you need is to properly prepare. That's all. Ignoring some of the idiotic rules I think flying within the US has actually gotten better in the last decade. I have had -0- issues traveling the last few years. Spend a few trips flying through asia or europe and you will come begging for TSA.
regexp
xint
Posted 3:08 AM 28/5/08
@spectator101 and @ripfire4: It's the principality of the situation, my brothers!
xint
Windhawk
Posted 3:07 AM 28/5/08
There is more than enough to see here in these great united states that foregoing airline travel isn't much of a sacrifice.
Windhawk
mullingitover
Posted 2:51 AM 28/5/08
The security theatre is ridiculous. Notice how they never release any information about their internal audits: it's because the TSA almost always fails them. They're not actually keeping anything or anyone safe, they're just fucking up your trip to the airport. The TSA blog constantly gets hammered for their shit, it's hilarious.
mullingitover
ripfire4
Posted 2:45 AM 28/5/08
@xint: Oh hell no. The laptop stays with me. :)
ripfire4
Joseph
Posted 2:37 AM 28/5/08
@spectator101: Yeah but how is a dog gonna sniff out a box cutter?
Joseph
spectator101
Posted 2:33 AM 28/5/08
@xint: So, don't put your REAL HDD in the system, swap it out for a disk with just an OS on it. Works every time.
Or, ever hear of TruCrypt?? look it up.
spectator101
ncc74656m
Posted 2:33 AM 28/5/08
I now travel via airplane only when absolutely necessary, as dictated by my work requirements of the distance being travelled. Yes, I have become a professional traveler (as long as my flight is AFTER 6 AM, otherwise I'm still a zombie), but no, it's just not worth it anymore. I tried to con my job into paying for a Clear card, but that's hardly worth it for the amount of personal information they will then have on file for you.
ncc74656m
spectator101
Posted 2:32 AM 28/5/08
Screw the whole X-Ray scanning crap, just put a row of K9s and let everyone pass them. Dogs can find drugs, explosives and firearms better than these morons doing scanning EVER will.
spectator101
xint
Posted 2:23 AM 28/5/08
@ripfire4: True, very true... but... I would never send my laptop with the airport, and carrying the laptop with me would be even worse now-a-days... I don't want "sticky-finger-security-guy" going through my personal files.
xint
ps61318
Posted 2:23 AM 28/5/08
@Monty: Yeah, now that all of our tall buildings have been airplane-proofed, and all of our airplanes have been protected definitively from the creativity of bomb throwing terrorists, and that airplanes now run on Perrier so that they AREN'T football-field sized flying bombs in the wrong hands...
Yeah, the horse has SO left the stables. I'm pretty sure that the incidence of skyjackings between about 1980 and 2001 was, like, really low - guess the horse came back to the stable for a bit, eh?
It may be harder to hijack a plane now, but a determined lunatic still will try, and maybe even succeed, G-d forbid.
ps61318
Toshie
Posted 2:13 AM 28/5/08
@Monty: "This is even funnier when you consider the fact that the airline hijacking horse has long-since left the stable."
Are you implying that our tiger repellent isn't effective? Well, you don't see any tigers around, do you?
Toshie
ripfire4
Posted 2:11 AM 28/5/08
And when they say "security-friendly laptop bags", do they mean "laptop thongs"?
@xint: Why not just check everything in? Lost luggages rarely occur on direct flights as opposed to having connecting flights. As a frequent flyer myself, I've pretty much gotten used to all the security details at the airport, having all loose stuff in my carry-on. Sure it's a hassle, but it's not like I don't know what's to be expected.
ripfire4
nospamsam
Posted 2:09 AM 28/5/08
We should just pay the airline by the pound.
When you pick up your ticket you stand on the scale with ALL your luggage and your ticket price is adjusted accordingly.
I just don't want to be seated next to the guy that brought nothing but a speedo.
nospamsam
Uberdude328i
Posted 2:06 AM 28/5/08
I just went through security at DFW on Friday. I went through a line where they told me to leave my laptop in my bag. It wasn't lazy security or long lines either. The x-ray machine was easily twice the size of the ones in the other lines (where you had to take your laptop out). I'm not sure what this comment will do for anyone, but it seemed relevant... I guess you can take away that there is technology out there that doesn't require inconvenience or a fancy and (more-than-likely) overprices clamshell laptop bag.
Uberdude328i
axiomatic
Posted 2:05 AM 28/5/08
I've just stopped flying all together.
Driving does take longer but its far less hassle.
axiomatic
killarclown
Posted 1:59 AM 28/5/08
@Kaiser-Machead: hmmm total recall styles, eh? 3 boobie vacations would be a blast!
killarclown
xint
Posted 1:58 AM 28/5/08
@leonard71: how is that wasting money? Isn't everyone bitching and complaining about airport crap? It sounds like a solution to me. Your comment is exaggerating the situation. Overnighting your stuff is not a waste of money when you know what crap you have to go through at the airport... to me, it is a wise investment.
xint
leonard71
Posted 1:53 AM 28/5/08
@xint: Or to be even more wasteful of money, we could buy everything new when we get there!
leonard71
xint
Posted 1:53 AM 28/5/08
@P3nnst8r: Yes it will turn out to be a bit more expensive. And insurance for some delicate things, like the laptop might be a bit out of the budget. You can't just send the lappy in a box... the point is to have it in one piece when you get to the hotel or where ever.
But if I'm a frequent flyer (for example), and I know I have to be somewhere at a specific time, and I know the airports are becoming a pain in the ass... I will make sure I have enough money in the traveling expenses... if not, I will make it clear to my employer, and if I was self employed I'd send a complaint to myself to have a bigger budget for traveling expenses. LOLOLOLoLOLo!!
xint
digidt
Posted 1:52 AM 28/5/08
@P3nnst8r: yeah, ditto
digidt
Kaiser-Machead
Posted 1:50 AM 28/5/08
Well, I guess I'll just become a flightless America-clinging land lubber that can just watch our own whale-free seas from the comfort of the shoreline.
This, coupled with the $15/first bag-$20/second bag-$25/third bag American Airlines shenanigans and I may have to look to chemically induced travel instead of the real thing.
Kaiser-Machead
Monty
Posted 1:40 AM 28/5/08
And they wonder why foreigners laugh about our airport security process. "Take off your shoes! You might have dynamite toe-jam! Bwah-ha-ha-ha!"
This is even funnier when you consider the fact that the airline hijacking horse has long-since left the stable.
Monty
PollockRoc
Posted 1:40 AM 28/5/08
Flying sucks. Why would I want to cram myself into a tube hurtling through the air at 700 mph next to some fat dude who went drinking the night before, didn't shower in the morning and is sweating like he's got a fever of 400?
Oh, that's right, because gas is a billion dollars a gallon.
I'm staying home this summer.
PollockRoc
UofITom
Posted 1:37 AM 28/5/08
Wait...what was the issue with my current laptop bag?
UofITom
P3nnst8r
Posted 1:36 AM 28/5/08
@xint: I wish i had money, too.
P3nnst8r
liveinvt
Posted 1:33 AM 28/5/08
Airport travel has gotten steadily more fascist over the years. It wasn't fun before, but now it's just a complete clusterfvck. Strip naked and bend over because they probe everything. Eat it.
liveinvt
st.bao.luo
Posted 1:33 AM 28/5/08
God Bless America....
I love how you tell us about living on the sea in the previous article. Then you give us another good reason to leave dry land!!
st.bao.luo
xint
Posted 1:31 AM 28/5/08
Overnight everything a day ahead to the hotel or where ever I'm staying... and I mean eeeeverything. Walk in through that airport with just a shoulder bag with some snacks and a media player for the trip.
No lost baggage, not stuck at the check points, no going through my personal things... nothing, zero, zip, naaaada. Watch a flick during the flight on the media player, and don't even have to ask for snacks, already brought me own.
xint
gibson042
Posted 10:13 PM 29/5/08
@nogoodnamesleft: Could you do us a favor and describe the reasons for your annoying procedures, as well as showing how they are not only effective, but superior to less intrusive options? No? Sorry, but "trust me" doesn't cut it in the case of an organization with a $7 billion budget that pays TSOs to stand around while insisting that everyone devote two hours of time to pre-flight harassment.
The TSA is parasitic, and due to the nature of its mission can never succeed. All the good intentions in the world don't give you the right to order the terms of private agreements. All the screening in the world won't stop a real terrorist from doing damage in front of the checkpoints.
P.S. I have never seen a stressed-out TSO. In my experience, 90% were lazy and apathetic; the remaining 10% were merely people doing a job. And every one of them is welcome at any time to quit their low-appreciation position in favor of productive employment.
gibson042