Networks
Japan Confirms Kizuna Satellite Internet Is World's Fastest, Blows Our Crappy Broadband Away
Posted by Matt Buchanan at 6:10 AM on April 10, 2008
Generally speaking, the state of broadband in the United States sucks. (AU: It's worse over here)Hard. You know what sucks harder than your crappy DSL line? Satellite internet—it's stupid expensive and super slow. Except in Japan. The Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency is reporting that their tests of the world's fastest satellite internet—155Mbps downstream to homes, and 1.2Gbps to businesses with properly endowed antennas—have been successful. Not only to they plan to cover all of Japan, but a fair bit of the Asian Pacific region. Meanwhile, we shit ourselves over 50Mbps cable that runs US$150 a month. [JAXA via Impress, JAXA (More Info, readable)]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
Vavoom
Posted April 10, 2008 10:43 AM
What are you Americans complaining about? Last time I was there, you guys had unlimited download limits and everyone I talked to was shocked that Australia has limits per month.
Anonymous
Posted April 12, 2008 11:47 PM
lol the US might have no downlaod limits, but they have the Mafia and organised crime (RIAA / MPAA)
j-vox
Posted September 2, 2008 9:10 PM
if anything, this satellite is the next step in the future of wireless internet and so forth
aesopbx
Posted 6:07 AM 10/4/08
I thought the free market was supposed to spur competition and the consumer would benefit from new innovation and lower prices... $150 for 50mbps?!?!?!?!? Props to the Japanese for this advancement
aesopbx
riqgeez
Posted 6:07 AM 10/4/08
@kc2idf:
jkr said so.
riqgeez
TheCyberBob
Posted 5:58 AM 10/4/08
Hey Gizmodo. Not to nit pick but the sentence, "Not only to they plan to cover all of Japan, but a fair bit of the Asian Pacific region." should have the first "to" as "do" instead.
TheCyberBob
riqgeez
Posted 5:54 AM 10/4/08
@fuzzycuffs: rather stay here. too crowded over there.
riqgeez
kc2idf
Posted 5:53 AM 10/4/08
@riqgeez: Who said it did?
kc2idf
fuzzycuffs
Posted 5:50 AM 10/4/08
this is synchronous? Wow, before those satellite links were alright for downloads, stupidly slow for uploads.
I'm impressed. I'd say I wish we got that in the US, but it'd be more truthful to say I wish I lived in Japan. :(
fuzzycuffs
riqgeez
Posted 5:49 AM 10/4/08
@jkr: So how does it travel faster than light if it is indeed light?
riqgeez
jkr
Posted 5:45 AM 10/4/08
@The-Joker: satellite also uses "light" as a means of data transport, it's just the kind you can't see.
jkr
jkr
Posted 5:44 AM 10/4/08
@nutbastard: so if i put in the "kill all" command, after a few seconds, my avatar can dominate with it's uber huge pipe cannons. (just trying for the geekyist comment of the year).
jkr
The-Joker
Posted 5:42 AM 10/4/08
I have more trust in fiber optic internet. Seems more interesting and the data travels with light, so that's cool. It has the potential to reach 10,000 times the speed of our internet. CERN (the maker of the Large Hadron Collider) is planning to use this technology to access the data made by the machine. Read here: [www.techtree.com]
The-Joker
citizen024
Posted 5:42 AM 10/4/08
ahahahaha, $150 for a 50 Mbps line, you guys are getting soooo ripped off. We get a 100 line for half as much, and in some places for a tenth the price (although I'm not THAT lucky personally). I piTy The fools wiTh The slow ass lines.
citizen024
Abnormal
Posted 5:37 AM 10/4/08
My parents are still on 28.8bps dial-up. I don't know how they can stand it.
Abnormal
mr30gZune
Posted 5:36 AM 10/4/08
@riqgeez:
you mean mothra?
mr30gZune
nutbastard
Posted 5:30 AM 10/4/08
@discounteggroll:
wlcrm has it right - latency would be unbearable for gaming. Even browsing would have a delay, but once the request goes through and it starts downloading, that's where you'd see the bandwidth step up to the plate.
nutbastard
riqgeez
Posted 5:25 AM 10/4/08
we'll see what Godzilla has to say 'bout this!
riqgeez
wlcrm
Posted 5:23 AM 10/4/08
@discounteggroll: bandwidth is not the same as lag. In fact, you'd probably have a significant amount of lag if you tried to game over this.
wikipedia [en.wikipedia.org] says its orbit is about 36,000 km which comes out to 120ms as an absolute minimum, from the base station to the satellite, and that's one way.
wlcrm
aec007
Posted 5:21 AM 10/4/08
This all sounds great until the BORG knock down the satellite before assimilation and we cannot coordinate a counter attack.
:0
aec007
riqgeez
Posted 5:20 AM 10/4/08
So FIOS can't even keep up huh? Then I'll hack into Japan's network.
riqgeez
mikehtiger
Posted 5:18 AM 10/4/08
So they'll be erecting endowed antennas all over japan for high speed porn?
mikehtiger
flyboy
Posted 5:17 AM 10/4/08
oh dear - Cisco stock might not be too happy on this baby.
there must be some bandwidth limit to the system - the satellite? and BTW - is it really 150 a month? not that I recall in NC anyway.
flyboy
discounteggroll
Posted 5:14 AM 10/4/08
there's negative lag when it comes to gaming. you shoot and kill other people before they even see you it's so fast
discounteggroll
riqgeez
Posted 5:14 AM 10/4/08
Properly endowed, sounds like me.
riqgeez
jkr
Posted 6:51 AM 10/4/08
@riqgeez: I most certainly did NOT say anything traveled faster than light. Re-read again, and don't put words in my mouth.
@jlawson: Well despite that, the current reigning theory is that even with quantum entanglement, information can not travel faster than light. The problem is trying to extract information from 2 particle entangled. The math is dense, but needless to say, the current theory stands. But it would be great if it was found to be wrong.
jkr
jlawson
Posted 6:40 AM 10/4/08
@riqgeez: About the faster-than-light: there's always photon superpositioning and quantum entanglement... Someday, instantaneous data transfer.
jlawson
kramthegram
Posted 6:38 AM 10/4/08
In short, all the talk about lag versus bandwith comes down to the fact that satellite in general sucks for anything that needs real-time interactivity but is great for things that require high throughput. Great for torrents, absolutely miserable for mmorpg's.
kramthegram
DJTripleRRR
Posted 6:32 AM 10/4/08
Ey Maguwa don't complain! We only got friggen 4mb/s top here and that's the equivilent of 150 dollars for capped!
DJTripleRRR
EL_RIEL
Posted 6:29 AM 10/4/08
Never post about cheap fast broadband..
I pay $60usd for 2Mbps ...
>:|
EL_RIEL
geschmidtt
Posted 6:20 AM 10/4/08
@outlanderssc: We did it for cheap oil! Worked great...
geschmidtt
zsleek7
Posted 6:16 AM 10/4/08
Does this include Hawaii?
I read on their site that it uses "WINDS uses Ka-band frequency radio waves, which have a frequency range of about 20 to 30 GHz" I wonder if that sets off radar detectors.
I would trust those japs to come up with a better solution than the american telco companies anyday.
zsleek7
outlanderssc
Posted 6:13 AM 10/4/08
Hey, it was a choice - invade Iraq or spend the money on cool tech projects and education.
Like true Americans, we chose to blow stuff up.
outlanderssc
Log1c
Posted 7:14 AM 10/4/08
You'll still have some latency issues for gaming I think...
Either way, fucking awesome. I still want fiber in my house though, but getting pr0n beamed into my house just sounds cool.
Log1c
Monty
Posted 7:33 AM 10/4/08
The problem with a Satellite connection to the internet is not the bandwidth -- that has always been acceptable, even with crappy U.S. companies. The problem is the latency. Who cares if you have a 155Mbps connection if it takes seconds for a packet to travel from your computer to the server and back. Yes, if you are just torrenting the world all day long, this might be good. But, if you actually want to get work done (Citrix, Terminal Services, etc), I suspect even this amazing connection would be borderline worthless.
Give me a call when they have 20ms ping times on this bad boy, and then they might actually have something.
Monty
ltcmurray
Posted 8:25 AM 10/4/08
@Monty: Bravo!
One key question they (sat providers) ask you is:
"Are you going to use this for online gaming?"
If you answer yes, they will steer you away from the sat option. Takes too long for the signal to pass through phone lines and go up to the sats, or bounce signals up to sats, down to ground and then back. I hate latency...
ltcmurray
JustADude
Posted 10:11 PM 10/4/08
I have internet connections all over the world in places I have business branches and yes our prices here are failures by comparison.
Satellite has lag it always will but it you are steaming Youtube for example, once it starts the stream you don't care,only interactive stuff suffers.
You DTV or Dish has the same delay , it just shifts you by a second or so. Satellite is best for multi cast down steam.
Bandwidth fixation is way overdone. Give everyone and OC3 connection and you can fill your hard drive inventory at the house by lunch, then what do you do?
Even 10meg DSL can steam video to watch and download a file in background and handle all the RSS you can eat.
Unless you have multiple users sharing a connection at home for most users 50 meg is just an overpaid status symbol.
JustADude
mathdino
Posted 7:53 AM 10/4/08
I'm with the latency issue.
Assuming geostationary satellites orbit ~38500km above the earth, light travels at 299792458 m/s... That comes to (excluding any other overhead) .1284 seconds or 128.4ms latency. This is unacceptable for online gaming. 0-40ms is nice for FPS online games. 80-100ms for MMORPGS... Anything else is pushing it. So my response to the story: Who cares?
mathdino