Cameras
Casio Exilim EX-F1 Slow-Mo Super Cam Full Review (Verdict: Totally Unique, Shockingly Powerful)
Posted by Wilson Rothman at 1:45 AM on April 26, 2008
OK, say it: What the hell? What's with all the Casio EX-F1 love? It's because this camera is the most underrated gadget to hit the market in at least a year—the camera fiend's equivalent of a jungle gym, with slow-mo, super slow-mo, high-speed stills, and simultaneous HD video and full-resolution still shooting, to name a few of its unique talents. If you're a nature lover, an explosion lover, a blender lover, a party goer, a pet owner, a parent, grandparent, godparent, secret agent or all-around creepy stalker type, it will rock your little tiny world. It's not flawless, but damn if it's not a beautiful and one-of-a-kind invention.
You've already seen the slow-mo tomato blending, and you've seen the slow-mo DIY backyard Discovery Channel. You get it, it can do slow-mo. But there are other features that stand to be demo'd on video, so take a look:
Let's recap exactly what talents the camera has that have not, in any meaningful combination, been seen before in a consumer-level camera:
• Slow-mo video shooting at 300, 600 and 1200 frames per second
• Fast-slow-fast shooting from 30fps to 300 and back to 30 — I call this the "she walked in the room" mode, because it's what they do in cheesy 80s movies to indicate the protagonist's love interest
• High-speed 6-megapixel shots at 60fps
• Strobe shooting of stills at 7 frames per second with standard flash; 60fps with LED flash
• Full-resolution still shooting while capturing HD video
• Fly-in and fly-out auto modes, which capture still shots at 60fps when the subject enter or exit the frame
EX-F1 as Camcorder
As a camcorder, it covers a lot of bases. In HD mode, it can shoot 60 "fields" at 1920x1080—that's code for 1080i—and 30 "frames" at 1280x720, all the while letting you take a total of 20 6-megapixel still shots. Since David Pogue's review ran, Casio published firmware 1.02 that fixes a major complaint: When shooting video, you now can actively use the 12x optical zoom lens.
We've covered the slow-motion camera already quite a bit, but let me be clear: it shoots 300, 600 or 1200 fps and encodes them on the fly to an H.264 file at 30 frames per second. So 1 second of shooting equals 10 seconds of footage. This causes some challenges, like long periods of lag between action, but there's a very easy in-camera editing tool that deletes all unneeded footage. You can't use the zoom in high-speed mode, but trust me, there's no time to zoom when you're shooting like that.
As you saw in the video above, there's also a mode for going from standard-def 30fps to slow-mo 300fps and then back again, what I call the "she walked into the room" mode. It's pretty cool, and probably more useful than just standard slow-mo.
Also, to recap: when shooting at 300fps, you get "standard" video resolution of 512x384. At 600fps, it drops to a tolerable widescreen, 432x192. But when you shoot in 1200fps, you end up with a bizarre 336x96, really long and thin. There's also a major loss of light when switching from standard to slow-mo, and then each subsequent jump. 1200fps is only good outdoors on a very sunny day, but even 300fps is no good in any kind of dim light. It makes sense, of course, but you need to consider it, especially if you're into experimental amateur porn cinematography.
Auto-focus is decent for still shooting, but I sometimes found for slow-mo video that it was simpler just to go manual. If you start recording slow-mo video out of focus, there's very little hope that it will focus during your shot.
One other frustration I experienced was that videos occasionally came out garbled or unreadable. I hope the 1.02 firmware update has a fix for that—I can only assume it's a known and fixable problem, albeit an annoying one.
EX-F1 as Still Camera
To be clear, this camera is the anti-DSLR. It's as digital as you can get, so you have to expect some photographic shortcomings. But the tradeoffs are reasonable, with still options that are not available anywhere else.
You can shoot full-resolution 6-megapixel stills at up to 60fps, to ensure that you get a decent pic of a fast-moving subject. I preferred to use something more like 7fps or 15fps with pets and kids, since they're not that fast, and you have no idea how annoying it can be to flip through 60 or more identical-looking shots.
As with slow-mo video, you do lose the higher f-stop settings when you set it for 60, as everything would just be pitch black. What you do get, though, to compensate, is a strobe flash. Though Pogue thought it was too explosive, I thought it works well when you need it. As you can see from the screenshot above, you can use a real flash up to 7fps, and then you have to switch to a mellower LED light, which can't illuminate everything, but is better than nothing. We intend to subject this camera to some further in-the-trenches club shooting courtesy of Gawker video guy Nick McGlynn (shown here helping me demonstrate flash-strobe mode):
The other mode does the opposite. You aim it at a critter that is not moving, and when it starts to move, and exit the frame, the camera saves the shots, so you get a dramatic action shot of its departure. As I hinted, low-light shooting isn't great, and the tiny, experimental
Shadows are even pretty noisy at lower ISO settings—here's 800:
Annoyances aside, I found the EX-F1 to live up to our Bestmodo status because of its versatility and originality. It's nice and rugged, too, capable of withstanding being flung into the air (what good is slow-mo if you can't move fast?). It had a nice long battery life, too: I shot for six days straight—gathering plenty of video and tons of rapid fire full-resolution stills—before the battery died. Update: Some of you asked about memory capacity, and even though I was shooting with an 8GB SDHC card, the hard limit is 4GB of video. For stills, the buffer can hold 60 shots. Here's the details, from Casio:
So ultimately there's just this small issue of the US$1000 price tag: Is it worth it? My answer is this: if you're looking for a great video camera that also takes decent stills, then yes, it's worth it. But if you're looking for the perfect still camera, it's a far cry. But you might miss it when you go on safari, or to a baseball game, or when you're lighting off fireworks, or when your pets are doing goofy shit, or when... Okay, maybe it is worth it, no matter what your purposes. [Product Page]
The limit would be 4GB of [video] recording. So at 1080i you are looking at about 40 minutes. Now if you had a 8GB card you could [stop and] then take another 40 minute video, but the file system hits 4GB and has to stop recording. [For stills] you can take 60 shots before the buffer is full. So you can do 60fps for 1 second or 30 fps for 2 seconds, 20 fps for 3 seconds, etc.


Let's recap exactly what talents the camera has that have not, in any meaningful combination, been seen before in a consumer-level camera:








Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
LittleJon
Posted 2:35 AM 26/4/08
Just FYI, it uses a CMOS sensor, not a CCD.
LittleJon
yogibimbi
Posted 2:30 AM 26/4/08
SO, it basically just looks like a DSLR, but is, rather, a video camera? Hmmm, I'm having already issues with my JVC Everio GZ MC500 with lots of noise on the still, maybe the Sony HDR-SR12 would be better for stills, after all, at least according to the review on camcorderinfo...
yogibimbi
DaOtter
Posted 2:26 AM 26/4/08
Damn, $1000 is tough... But if I had it, this would be the best possible camera I could buy. I'm not into super high-quality photos, but I do shoot skateboarding footage, and no other still digital camera can touch the FPS rates this thing gets. Shoot, just 10FPS would be fine by me. Maybe a consideration for future, more budget minded models?
DaOtter
makanai
Posted 2:23 AM 26/4/08
Even though I have no interest in the camera, this is a great review. Informative and funny. Good stuff.
makanai
Step666
Posted 2:14 AM 26/4/08
Now all we have to do is wait for a decent camera manufacturer to make something similar...
All kidding aside, I'm sure it's not a terrible camera but I'll be long dead before I ever consider buying a Casio.
Step666
davidm
Posted 2:06 AM 26/4/08
How long of can you record a standard def video file? I only saw the 9 minutes for Max quality video file on the product page. Just curious.
davidm
MrBlahBlah
Posted 2:01 AM 26/4/08
nice review - very informative. It seems that this is sort of an "in-between" product that not quite a camcorder and not quite a high quality camera. And at $1,000, that is a tough pill to swallow
of course it does things that other cameras can't, and if you really want those features, then i guess this is the product for you.
MrBlahBlah
johnnyabnormal
Posted 2:01 AM 26/4/08
we iz interezted!!! cule!
johnnyabnormal
nizz
Posted 3:29 AM 26/4/08
As a final test, can you run it in slo-mo and toss the camera in the air. Make sure you catch it though the video might be even better if you don't.
nizz
Matthew77
Posted 3:25 AM 26/4/08
One question I've never been able to get answered (even after holding one at CES in January).
What's the duration of shooting for the hi-def modes? Can it go continuously until the card is full? The rep at CES told me 2 seconds maximum in any mode, which sounded silly.
Als0, how long for the higher speed modes. And does it have a CMOS sensor with the inherent "rolling shutter" artifacts?
Matthew77
Wilson Rothman
Posted 2:57 AM 26/4/08
@LittleJon: Good catch—sorry 'bout that. Just fixed it.
Wilson Rothman
Kaiser-Machead
Posted 2:41 AM 26/4/08
I wannit. I'd squeeze every penny out of that 1k with this thing.
Kaiser-Machead
krokus
Posted 3:32 AM 26/4/08
how long you reckon before 2.0, or the SLR full slab sensor? and will THAT be a bajillion dollars?
krokus
1roll20s
Posted 4:30 AM 26/4/08
I would totally buy it as a video camera to supplement my dslr if it could shoot at least 720p to card capacity.
1roll20s
mthrndr
Posted 4:10 AM 26/4/08
man, I can't wait for all the vlogger videos made with this thing of slo-mo bouncing boobies...bouncing boobies, people.
mthrndr
Scaramanga
Posted 6:36 AM 26/4/08
Great review. I would be interested to see what other manufactures can do with the uber-fast Sony sensor that inside this Casio EX-F1 since its available to other manufactures as well. Personally would love to see one inside a camera with an interchangeable lens.
[gizmodo.com]
[www.sony.net]
Would also be interested to see if Sony could build this sensor larger that would be befitting a DSLR.
Scaramanga
minjae0810
Posted 9:36 AM 26/4/08
zes!
minjae0810
Step666
Posted 11:00 AM 26/4/08
@Scaramanga: the sensor isn't necessarily suitable for a D-SLR.
To take advantage of it's speed, you'd need to lock the mirror up, otherwise you'd be limited by the speed of the mirror assembly. But, IIRC, on auto-focus SLRs and D-SLRs, the focusing requires the mirror to be down, meaning that whilst you were recording, the focusing wouldn't be able to adjust to the action.
On top of that, you have the general issues that locking the mirror up on a D-SLR is a great way of getting your sensor dusty.
Then you have the fact that a D-SLR just isn't designed to record movies, nor are they generally marketed towards people who want their camera to do so.
And to be honest I think it's better kept that way, as opposed to trying to make them jack of all trades and master of none - if I spend serious money on a D-SLR, I want it to do what it was intended to and do it well. But, hey, that's just me.
Step666
Scaramanga
Posted 2:20 PM 26/4/08
@Step666:
Certainly the mirror would need to be up for exposure to the sensor, however, such technology is already being used by modern live-view cameras while maintaining AF capabilities.
Nikon and Canon use a contrast based method for AF during live-view mode. Sony and Olympus are much more clever, in those iteration you can use live-view and still have full AF function. They do this by having a small sensor in the viewfinder that acts as the display in the LCD while the light is still being reflected to the AF sensor. This is being used in the Alpha-250 and Alpha-350 as well as Olympus DSLRs.
The real interest of these new type of sensors is that its clearly moving beyond what modern dSLRs are capable of, and when you look at the trend and capabilities of modern dSLRs they are entirely different beasts to what they were a decade ago. As the dSLR evolves, the types of photographs that can be taken with cameras in the future will be unthinkable compared to today. In this case, ultra-high-speed photography.
Scaramanga
Step666
Posted 4:10 PM 26/4/08
@Scaramanga: I stand corrected, I was unaware that there were ways of getting round the focusing problem.
I try and keep reasonably abreast of the goings on but things like 'live view' have just always struck me as gimmicky. I guess I should give 'em a second look...
As for the Olympus and Sony method, I may be misinterpreting matters but I don't see how that solves the problem.
Ok, yes, they have a sensor in the viewfinder to provide 'live view' but the mirror must still have to be locked up when you want to record, no?
So do they just revert to the Canon and Nikon method during recording then?
And, yes, D-SLRs are evolving but there are certain functions they're just not well suited for and, like I say, I for one don't really see the point of trying to force them to do things they can't do well.
Step666
MadOverlord
Posted 3:39 AM 27/4/08
In answer to the question, the camera can record in high-speed modes up to the memory capacity of the card (or, I suppose, 4GB, whichever is smaller). It is not limited to the internal buffer.
It really needs a lot of light in the high-speed modes, though. The best cheap indoors light source I have found for them is tungsten halogen worklights, which do not flicker at 120hz.
I got mine the day they came out, and will be using it at the Carolina Combat and Robogames combat robotics events to hopefully capture some interesting footage.
MadOverlord
Calistograph
Posted 8:21 AM 27/4/08
OMG! Awesome! Another camera review. :|
Calistograph
powerball
Posted 1:13 PM 27/4/08
I can't wait until Sony makes their version of this camera.
powerball
Scaramanga
Posted 1:47 PM 27/4/08
@Step666:
There is a detailed explaination of Sony's live-view in the below link:
[www.photoclubalpha.com]
Essentially you get full AF capabilities in LV, and there is no noticeable pause between when the sensor is capturing images and when its not.
The fact is, the reflecting mirror and pentaprism/pentamirror are primarily there to display a representative image to the photographer. There are good alternatives to reflecting light to the AF/Metering like the above link has shown. The SLR design was of course was important in the film days when there was no better option to compose your shot.
However, in the digital area its clearly moved on from that. You can actually get a better representation from the sensor then a mirror (which is why Live view is popular). This new Casio shows what things can be done beyond our traditional perceptions of classical SLR design.
Capturing images at 1/40,000 of a second like this camera can are capabilities that high end cameras need (its a feature even hacked canon point-and-shoots have nowadays).
Scaramanga
josh.vh
Posted 1:01 PM 26/4/08
For those of you curious, I have this camera and on any of the video modes you can take High speed, 720p, 1080i, or SD movies up to 4GB in size. This is because the card is formatted as FAT and has a 4GB file size limit. in 720p though you can take over an hour and a half movie. and id it stops, you can start up another etc...
josh.vh
theredbaron
Posted 4:10 AM 1/5/08
I'm 'fairly' new into the digital camera market... just outgrown my Fuji Finepix S5100. I've weighed up a few replacements from compact to slr but am ultimately seeking one feature .... built in time-lapse... i'd like to shoot over a range of say 2fps up to 1fpm to capture day/hour-long events. I know you can hook up slr to laptops to do this but WHY!!!... why give me 60fps but not 6spf built in? I've found the Canon Powershot S5is has time-lapse but for some reason best known to themselves Canon removed the RAW feature for this model.. Who runs the consumer data departments for them? My reason for wanting time-lapse is because of my hand disability making it very difficult to continually press the shutter release. it would be nice to press it once while everyone is lining up for wedding pics and take 0.5fps continually for a while and choose the best shots later.
Anyway... if anyone can point me in the right direction i'd marry your daughter... you know, the ugly one you cant shift..
theredbaron
theredbaron
Posted 4:07 AM 1/5/08
I'm 'fairly' new into the digital camera market... just outgrown my Fuji Finepix S5100. I've weighed up a few replacements from compact to slr but am ultimately seeking one feature .... built in time-lapse... i'd like to shoot over a range of say 2fps up to 1fpm to capture day/hour-long events. I know you can hook up slr to laptops to do this but WHY!!!... why give me 60fps but not 6spf built in? I've found the Canon Powershot S5is has time-lapse but for some reason best known to themselves Canon removed the RAW feature for this model.. Who runs the consumer data departments for them? My reason for wanting time-lapse is because of my hand disability making it very difficult to continually press the shutter release. it would be nice to press it once while everyone is lining up for wedding pics and take 0.5fps continually for a while and choose the best shots later. Can this Exilim do that?
Anyway... if anyone can point me in the right direction i'd marry your daughter... you know, the ugly one you cant shift..
theredbaron