Entertainment
Best Plasma Ever vs. Best LCD Ever (Verdict: Plasma Wins)
Posted by Jason Chen at 11:30 AM on December 21, 2007
Sound and Vision took took the best Plasma TV they could find (Pioneer Elite PRO-110FD Kuro) and the best LCD TV they could find (Samsung LN-T5281F), and threw them against each other in a carefully calibrated match. The winner, which we've actually seen before as the best flat panel ever, was the Pioneer Elite. Not only is it the best flat panel ever, thanks to improvements in both display techs, it's now actually the best TV ever. Period.
The winner was, in part, determined by how much better the plasma displayed blacks compared to the LCD.
But when we looked over at the Pioneer, we immediately knew we were seeing something special. The same features were so deep that it made the blacks on the LCD look gray -- even though this Samsung had the best blacks we've ever seen from an LCD. On the plasma, the car appeared more etched and dimensional against the dark background, thanks to the extra low-level detail, and the letterbox bars virtually disappeared into the set's black frame.The LCD also got points docked for having a smaller horizontal viewing angle, having an unusually glossy screen surface, and very slightly less good picture uniformity. However, this was the best LCD they've ever seen, and they claim that the technology still hasn't shown the best it can do—meaning there may still be hope yet for LCD fans. In the meantime, this plasma TV is the Best. TV. Ever. [Sound and Vision]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
Antonino Giglio
Posted December 23, 2007 10:44 PM
Sorry guys I'm a bit puzzled! This is Aussie Gizmodo so, where can you find in Australia the Pioneer Elite Kuro 110-FD? You also mentioned the Samsung with LED but that is only in USA so far..
Octopus
Posted March 25, 2008 4:37 PM
Pioneer Elite models are certainly the best TVs you can buy (if you have the money of course). However when you take price into consideration it seems Panasonic models give you a pretty good quality without having to sell your kidney.
I have found a top at www.thebestplasmatv.com that is supposed to list the best plasma TV models. I certainly agree that Pioneer and Panasonic make the best models but they also list Vizio as the best. They say it's the best plasma you can get if you're on a tight budget but then why would you buy a cheap plasma when you want the best? Kinda wierd IMO.
Anyways, I wouldn't have bought an Elite even if I would have had the money. The "regular" Kuro panels are frickin awesome and they are cheaper.
ripfire4
Posted 8:08 PM 20/12/07
@illiniguy: How long is "a while"?
ripfire4
dabu
Posted 8:07 PM 20/12/07
Wait, so this is saying that the Kuro is better than any crt tv as well? That isn't really clear from the conclusion. Hmm...are HD crt tvs even sold still?
dabu
illiniguy
Posted 8:04 PM 20/12/07
@teejay333: AFAIK the burn in problems have largely been solved. Its still an issue only if you are irresponsible with it (IE leave your video game or movie paused for a while) I think its still possible to see problems with burn in but they are a lot less likely than they used to be.
illiniguy
katorok
Posted 7:58 PM 20/12/07
@teejay333: what he said..
katorok
teejay333
Posted 7:51 PM 20/12/07
Is burn-in still a problem for plasmas? Because if it is I don't really care how much better the blacks are, I'm getting an LCD.
teejay333
KenL
Posted 7:51 PM 20/12/07
I am a nut and happens to have three HD (720p) viewing source in the house: projector, plasma, and LCD.
I love the projector for its 120" size (max), plasma for its deep blacks and image quality, and LCD for its price ($500 for 32" purchased in Nov 06).
KenL
rodsky
Posted 7:38 PM 20/12/07
well it better be for that price
rodsky
Jitty
Posted 9:12 PM 20/12/07
Aren't the new sony XBR4, XBR5 bravias the best? The samsung that's LED backlit might have deeper blacks but that's basically the only thing it's got...
Jitty
KenL
Posted 9:08 PM 20/12/07
Plasma != glossy screen. Any display technology (plasma, LCD, rear projection, etc) could have a glossy screen.
I personally do not have an issue with burn-in and have not even heard of any burn-in issue since gen-1 or 2 plasmas (we are now in gen 8?).
LCD, BTW, can get burn-in as well (OS X menu bar) but you don't have about it. Burn-in is the least of your concern.
Lastly, Much is correct that CRT has the absolute best quality but the largest ones commercially available was ~40" and could easily kill.
KenL
cad3
Posted 9:07 PM 20/12/07
@Munch: HAHAHA ditto! Except mine is only just over 200 lbs. And I'm pretty sure that I'm just going to leave it for the next occupant of this apartment. ;)
cad3
OMG!!! Ponies!!!
Posted 9:06 PM 20/12/07
@Munch: Gotta agree. The 34" XBR CRT is a great all-purpose TV. I stuck mine in a corner and don't really care that it weighs 200 lbs.
OMG!!! Ponies!!!
MrBlahBlah
Posted 9:01 PM 20/12/07
okay what about when you are playing a FPS for awhile....the radar image doesn't move on the screen, for example....bam. burn in. i don't want to be afraid to use my TV
MrBlahBlah
EMoShunz
Posted 8:43 PM 20/12/07
again i am disappointed to not see dlp :(
EMoShunz
Obtusegoose
Posted 8:35 PM 20/12/07
I've seen the Kuro at the Pioneer store. It has, by far, the best looking picture I've ever seen on a TV. The black levels are absolutely amazing. This is coming from the owner of Panasonic 42" plasma TV with a 4,000 to 1 black level.
Obtusegoose
Munch
Posted 8:31 PM 20/12/07
I like my big Sony HD CRT. Great picture, and anyone who's going to break into my house for a 250lb TV is welcome to it.
Munch
a magic pony
Posted 8:25 PM 20/12/07
my biggest issue with plasmas is their glossy screen which glares in a brighter room. I'm still using a 30 inch sony xbr lcd from 6 years ago and it's still fantastic. i leave stuff paused for an hour sometimes cause i'm forgetful like that and there's no burn in at all.
a magic pony
danson
Posted 8:20 PM 20/12/07
So, basically, you're telling me that a $6000 tv is better than a $4500 tv?
danson
danger_the_pirate
Posted 8:19 PM 20/12/07
@dabu: Yes : [www.bestbuy.com]
danger_the_pirate
fuzzycuffs
Posted 10:09 PM 20/12/07
@MrBlahBlah: Exactly. People say "just don't leave it on pause." No one does that. It's the elements of the HUD that always remain on screen in the same place, the crosshair in the middle on FPS games, that sort of thing that I'm afraid of when it comes to burn in.
With that in mind, I'd get the LCD as well. Vertical viewing angles isn't a big deal to me. Nicer blacks are nice, but I too do not want to be afraid to use my TV.
I'm waiting for the 46" 81F to be a reasonable price before jumping.
fuzzycuffs
Windhawk
Posted 9:57 PM 20/12/07
@OMG!!! Ponies!!!: McLuvin my XBR. Really nice bit of glass.
Windhawk
cad3
Posted 9:28 PM 20/12/07
@OMG!!! Ponies!!!: That's that I have. Are you kidding? It's great! There is pretty much no chance for a thief to make off with it. As if 200 lbs isn't bad enough, 180 lbs of the weight is in the front.
cad3
fusiongt
Posted 11:27 PM 20/12/07
@a magic pony: Well if you left something paused no a Pioneer Elite for an hour it's not like it would burn in either. Also, most likely the source you're pausing will have some kind of anti-burnin feature or the plasma will have it just in case you pause it for many, many hours.
Yes there's a glossy screen but just keep the light source to the side and not directly in front of the plasma and you'll be fine.
fusiongt
fusiongt
Posted 11:23 PM 20/12/07
@fuzzycuffs: You would have to play an FPS for an ungodly amount of time before the crosshairs could burn in. And if you actually do turn the game off and watch some TV, then there's nothing to fear. And like I said in my previous post, if you get an Elite you don't have to worry about that kind of stuff. Pioneer made plasmas and their newest models do not burn in unless you are extremely ignorant and leave one static source on for 6 hours a day for a week. And after 100 or so hours of running the plasma you shouldn't even have to worry about that anymore. So go ahead and get an LCD but if you can afford the Pioneer Elite, it's the best TV out there.
fusiongt
fusiongt
Posted 11:19 PM 20/12/07
Burn in is not a problem if you're smart and do some research. The TV comes out of the package on a very high bright/contrast setting which you don't need. If you turn that lower (and if you get an Elite you'll probably want to find people's TV settings online to get the best color, or ISF calibrate it) then you won't really need to worry about burn in. The person who mentioned if you are leave a static computer or game on your plasma will burn in kind of has it right but it's a bit vague... it's more like if you watch 4:3 tv for 6 hours a day (with the black bars on the sides) for a week, then you might have to worry about burn in. But seeing as how you got a widescreen plasma, you mine as well watch stuff in widescreen (duh!)
Also adding to that, once you have you plasma running for over 100 hours, you pretty much don't have to worry about burn-in. I'm not an expert on this but I believe the phosphors are a lot less suspectible to burn-in.
fusiongt
k-factor
Posted 10:57 PM 20/12/07
I've got a Samsung plasma and play a lot of 360 games. Same thing that ENDERVR46 says above. Static UI elements of games (think Halo, CoD, Katamari, etc) leave ghosts of themselves on the screen for a while afterwards. The longer they are onscreen, the longer they take to go away. My model has a few tools for handling burn protection, most effective of which seems to be the white scroll feature. This just kind of "washes" the entire screen with white. I let this thing go for a while after a long game session and everything clears up perfectly. This isn't exactly necessary as the retention will go away on its own. However, the manual makes it pretty clear that image retention from video games is NOT covered in the warranty, so I don't take any chances. With an LCD you obviously would never need to fiddle with this stuff, so I don't blame anyone who likes games for wanting a more worry-free panel.
k-factor
EnderVR46
Posted 10:28 PM 20/12/07
I've got a plasma and burn-in is not a problem. If you play a game for a while, the HUD will leave image retention, but it goes away after a minute or so of something else. Though I don't play for really long times, maybe 4 hours at the longest.
Black bars on movies or TV shows will leave a sharp line in full screen content for a few minutes, but it goes away. I do watch a lot of content with black bars, and the retention has never lasted more than about 2 minutes.
There really is nothing to worry about with Plasma. The worst thing about them, imo, is that like a CRT in 10 years it will have lost about 50% brightness. Good thing mine is perfect at about 35% right now. I'll just up it as it dims.
EnderVR46
teejay333
Posted 2:13 AM 21/12/07
@huygir: that's what she said!
But seriously, I don't want to have to constantly worry about my TV when I'm trying to enjoy myself. Personally I'm surprised that plasmas have lasted this long. It seems as though burn-in is never going to be completely solved. I think the manufactures should just completely dump plasmas and focus on improving LCDs.
teejay333
huygir
Posted 1:54 AM 21/12/07
50"... not big enough.
huygir
bdgbill
Posted 9:13 AM 21/12/07
I just picked up a 50" Hitachi plasma for $1200.00. The cheapest LCD that size (when you can find them) is well over $3000.00. I'll take my chances with burn in. If I have any problems, I will stick this tv in the bedroom in 2 years and probably pick up a 60" LCD for $500.00.
bdgbill
zakharm
Posted 8:43 AM 21/12/07
I have last year's Panasonic Plasma (TH-42PX60U) and all I do is play games on it. Burn-in has never been an issue like it was back in the Gen 1 & 2 days. For that reason, I don't worry about it. Like any TV I've had, if I'm going to walk away from it for a while I turn it off. Stop worrying about something that was a problem 8-10 years ago!
I'd be more worried about the response time of an LCD for playing games with ghosting issues than the burn-in of a Plasma.
zakharm
igneous
Posted 10:13 AM 21/12/07
Why the hell are we still talking about burn in?
igneous
EMoShunz
Posted 9:23 AM 21/12/07
@bdgbill: 50" in the bedroom...see teejay333's comment :P
EMoShunz
ReductiMat
Posted 11:54 AM 21/12/07
@Igneous: Think of it this way.. at least people aren't asking about where they have to go to refill the plasma.
ReductiMat
empathogen
Posted 12:20 PM 21/12/07
Re: Burn in on the Kuro,
I just bought the 60" non-Elite kuro,
and it hasn't had any real image retention to speak of.
This is in stark contrast to my older LG plasma (42PC3D),
which gets very noticeable retention (though it's still not a huge distraction).
empathogen
Blozout
Posted 3:17 PM 21/12/07
Plasma burn in can definitely still be an issue. I witnessed first hand on my friends Pioneer PDP 4270 what can happen if you are not careful. He would watch X-Files(I believe on FX)every night. They 4 episodes back to back. Not only did the FX symbol burn into the bottom right corner of the screen but he often watched in standard 4:3 and had burn in from the black bars on either side. Luckily it was only VERY noticeable when he would watch hockey where it would really stand out against the white ice.
If you pay attention you may notice that on HD channels the logos in the corners appear and disappear. It's actually a preventative measure against burn in on the televisions.
Note-the burn in never went away entirely, it fade over the course of a month and a half(we eventually pulled a bait and switch for the same model TV from Best Buy...problem solved.)
Blozout
Uncle-Meat
Posted 2:51 PM 21/12/07
I said it on the kuro thread but it's important so worth saying again...;-p
When I finally found a page in the uk kuro website that didn't 404 on me:
[www.pioneer.co.uk]
I confirmed my worst fears...
Resolution (horizontal x vertical) 1,024 x 768
That's only for the 42" model (probably the most popular size for us Europeans with our tiny rooms!) - but that, frankly, is pathetic. I'm off to buy a Samsung or Sony LCD.
Unc.
Uncle-Meat
BobbyCash
Posted 9:36 AM 21/12/07
As some seem to have forgoten, CRTs were also prone to burn in if you left a static image on the screen for extended times. The latest generation of plasmas are pretty good about not getting burn in and image retention. All one needs to remember is to at least lower the brightness settings and try and calibrate it.
If you think 50" is too small, you can always go for the 60" 150FP for about $8K.
Either way, I think I'd go with the 52XBR4 for a flat panel TV this year. Can't wait till CES to see what all is coming out.
BobbyCash
SinVegas
Posted 11:12 PM 20/12/07
As KFactor said burn in isnt really an issue anymore. Most plasmas come with some sort of way to get rid of it if it does happen. For everyones information just aboutany TV can burn in your: Plasma(obviously most common) LCDs(in your user manual look under Image Retention) and CRTS can aswell. Burn in isnt as big of a problem as it use to be by far.
SinVegas
newname
Posted 9:51 PM 20/12/07
A brand new plama might be better than a LCD but plasmas tend to degrade over time. I'd be more interested with a comparison of a one to two years old plasma and a LCD that is the same age. The verdict might not be the same.
newname
havok2022
Posted 3:41 AM 25/12/07
To the person who said "A $6000 tv is better than a $4500 tv) lets keep in mind that the Non-Elite version has the same panel, and priced right around $4500... and is still better.
havok2022
boe
Posted 7:53 PM 2/1/08
I'd like to see bigger screens - why did they stop at 70" I know a lot of people who don't want to buy projectors but would love an 80" screen as long as it looks good and is under 10K.
boe
boe
Posted 7:52 PM 2/1/08
I'd like to see larger screens plasma, LCD, LCOS, OLED, SED whatever it is I'd like to see larger and so would many of my friends. Not all of us have the space or an option for a projector but do have the wall space for a bigger screen. I wonder when we'll see 80" screens that look good for under $10K.
boe
plasmaconcepts.com
Posted 11:10 AM 3/1/08
I would have to agree with this article. As a dealer of both LCD and Plasma TVs, the Pioneer Plasma line is very hard to beat. I would also suggest looking at the non-Elite version as the value is much better.
plasmaconcepts.com
Subterfuge
Posted 4:04 PM 4/1/08
The deal with glossy screens vs non-glossy works the same way as glossy vs non-glossy, or matte, finished photographs. Glossy surfaces reflect light from point to point, like a mirror, so if the light source isn't being directly reflected to your eyes off of the screen you pretty much won't see it at all, which allows you to see the underlying surface without any light-pollution.
A non-glossy, or matte finish, surface doesn't reflect light directly but disperses it. The same amount of light is hitting the surface so it still needs somewhere to go. Instead of a bright focused reflection whose direction can be controlled it disperses all of the light that is hitting the screen throughout a large area in wide spread of directions. The end result is all of those nice deep blacks get watered down into a dark grey regardless of what angle you are viewing the screen from.
If your highest priority is contrast then you should lean toward glossy and adjust your light sources and room/window arrangements accordingly.
Subterfuge
mrz2u
Posted 5:32 PM 4/1/08
I believe this is the Samsung model with the glossy glass front element so reflection is an issue with this particular LCD so that renders this issue moot.
mrz2u