50% of UK Power Soon Coming from Wind?
Posted by Mark Wilson at 1:26 AM on December 11, 2007
This week UK energy secretary John Hutton will announce a plan to build enough wind turbines to power nearly half of the UK, with sites along the North Sea, Irish Sea and the coast of Scotland, all by the year 2020. The goal? Produce 33GW worth of electricity (or about 30 times that of some prototype DeLoreans we've seen).
The plan would call for massive wind turbines that would reach 850ft in the air to grab the good stuff so each of these generators could produce enough power for 8,000 homes.
Of course, an 850ft turbine is quite visible. And it means that the UK coastline may lose its scenic beauty. There's really no way to have your eco cake and eat it to. That's why we use hamster wheel generators for everything in the Wilson household. You get renewable energy and cuddly friends/an emergency food supply. [timesonline][image]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
Skeptical_Geezer
Posted 4:43 PM 10/12/07
Pardon the rampant alliteration, but...
Bye, Bye British Birdies!
Skeptical_Geezer
EBone
Posted 3:54 PM 10/12/07
I'll weigh in as the resident wind energy expert. The UK could pull this off, but it wouldn't leave many turbines for the rest of the world. Turbine backorders are running about 3+ years right now.
As far as Kansas and other great plains states are concerned, the wind potential is definitely there, but the demand is not. We're exploring delivery options right now, but we're talking about literally thousands of miles of transmission lines that are necessary. The permitting process across that many counties and states is going to be a long time, unless we can get some coordination help from the federal government as part of a mandatory national renewable portfolio standard.
EBone
islandmonk
Posted 1:35 PM 10/12/07
the cool thing about wind-power is that air doesn't really care if it is being blown or sucked. And neither do I.
islandmonk
jutman
Posted 1:31 PM 10/12/07
If i bought a few hundred acres in Kansas and put these up I could be checking them daily in my Rolls. If one powers 5000 homes @ .2c a KWH I see nothung but $$$$.
One wonders at this point how much the America government wants to keep the coal flowing. I would love to see a document with how much money goes from my electril bill right into the Republican and Democrat slush / vacation fund.
jutman
SnowPants
Posted 12:52 PM 10/12/07
@yogibimbi:
Couldn't agree more. I routinely drive between upstate New York and the Philadelphia area, and somewhere along the turnpike there's a small windmill farm along one of the mountain passes. Far from being an eyesore, I think they look lovely. Anyway, maybe when petro-based energy climbs even higher and stays there for a while, the NIMBY factions will come around. As for the danger to migrating birds mentioned by some, literally millions are killed by collisions with building windows and cars. The hazard from windmills is vastly overstated. (See [www.treehugger.com] )
SnowPants
dwarfgoat
Posted 12:37 PM 10/12/07
@FredicvsMaximvs: Stairs? Well, hell...that's what trucks and SUVs are for!
dwarfgoat
ideaman2020
Posted 12:17 PM 10/12/07
Man, that's a lot of jiggawatts!
Re: "the UK coastline may lose its scenic beauty", it's just a different kind of beauty...
ideaman2020
gokor
Posted 11:34 AM 10/12/07
They have these turbines in Alpha Dog, not surprisingly, they pull out a better performance than the entire live cast.
gokor
Toto
Posted 11:14 AM 10/12/07
Sounds almost too good to be true... :-|
They talk about incentives, to entice companies to invest and build these wind farms. They did that too in France some time back and now, due to an Eco law, the wind farm companies are being paid 3 times the going rate for electricity. The EDF is now bound to buy the electricity until something like 2015, even though it doesn't need it. France already exports about 20% of it's production to countries like the UK.
The only companies building these things on a large scale are German and Scandinavian firms so all the money and investment just goes abroad. The UK will loose out in the long term.
Even though it does blow quite a bit around the UK most of the time, there are times when the wind doesn't blow. What do you do then when 50% of the power cuts out...?
Toto
Kaiser-Machead
Posted 11:04 AM 10/12/07
@yogibimbi: I couldn't agree more. I'm amazed that people are less willing to balk at giant metal spaghetti mounds of oil refineries and dirt chugging power plants.
Kaiser-Machead
ANoel
Posted 10:56 AM 10/12/07
This would be one of the Wonders of the World!
ANoel
archercc
Posted 10:48 AM 10/12/07
Also, mix things up.
Fedex blanketed their entire roof in cali with modern solar panels. They will get enough to provide their peak power usage and put power back on the grid when they arent cranking away.
If people put smaller scale solar kits on their roofs they might not be independent but they could really reduce what has to be produced centrally.
archercc
archercc
Posted 10:46 AM 10/12/07
@tamoko: Being from Kansas, I agree. Its quite windy there and esimates if you covered 60% of the state with these things you could provide the power to the rest of the US.
At a cost, of course. Kansas would turn into the new Saudi Arabia (but with $200k pickups instead of Rolls)
archercc
Monty
Posted 10:38 AM 10/12/07
Damn limeys. Always making us look bad.
While I doubt they will be, I hope they are very visible. The world needs to see as much alternative energy power systems as they can to understand that we all need to take steps like this.
Monty
FredicvsMaximvs
Posted 10:14 AM 10/12/07
@yogibimbi: If people could figure out a way to get their cars up the stairs they'd drive to the loo, too.
FredicvsMaximvs
FredicvsMaximvs
Posted 10:13 AM 10/12/07
I personally don't see what's so ugly about them. I'd take these over smog in a heartbeat.
FredicvsMaximvs
moveteam
Posted 10:12 AM 10/12/07
Yogibimbi: Yes you're 100% right.
moveteam
yogibimbi
Posted 10:09 AM 10/12/07
oh, and apart from the 'd' behind 'perceived' I forgot to mention the uglyness of exhaust fumes (well, despite their obvious health issues), of the noise of cars, power plants and their other respective emissions...
yogibimbi
yogibimbi
Posted 10:06 AM 10/12/07
I can't really understand all those people whining about real or perceive aesthetical problems with wind turbines. Those are the same people who are prepared to accept the uglyness of conventional power plants and their chimneys, or of oil refineries, just to keep their central heating chugging along below 20°C and the airco above that, and drive everywhere with their car but to the loo?
The climate is going to hell in a handbasket and all anybody can say it _looks_ bad to stop emissions?
Well, if you prefer breathing in a mix of Ozone, elevated CO2 and other niceties in a sauna at 90°C average ambient temperature, be my guest, but you should seriously consider relocating to Venus.
yogibimbi
ImTheKing
Posted 9:59 AM 10/12/07
I wish this would pick up here in America
ImTheKing
strider_mt2k
Posted 9:57 AM 10/12/07
Cool place for 'em, even of the marine environment means more maintenance.
Very cool.
strider_mt2k
Redwraithvienna
Posted 9:49 AM 10/12/07
Na you won see it. They wont built it directly on the coastline but 20 - 50 kilomters away from the coast as they do it in denmark and germany now. They just have too built in on the continental shelf and withing the 200sm. Exclusive Economic Zone
Redwraithvienna
tamoko
Posted 9:49 AM 10/12/07
Bring on the wind turbine goodness.
All of Kansas and Wyoming should be blanketed with these things. Although there's still that problem of migrating birds....
tamoko
Compact
Posted 9:46 AM 10/12/07
How visible will they be?
Can you not just put them even further out to sea?
Anyway they can't look as bad as those huge container ships that you always see..
Compact
EBone
Posted 6:22 PM 10/12/07
For the bird lovers out there - less than 0.5% of all human - caused bird fatalities come from wind turbines. Over 90% are from domestic cat predation.
Www.awea.org
EBone
tcolberg
Posted 6:42 PM 10/12/07
When wind turbines are this large, they turn very slowly. At this speed and scale, the turbines will end up killing birds at the same rate as a tower of the same height (e.g. no chopping up of birds, but birds still fly into the pole every once in a while).
tcolberg
sublimnl
Posted 6:32 PM 10/12/07
1.21 JIGAWATTS!!!
sublimnl
Fatty1
Posted 9:55 PM 10/12/07
Fuck all the haters! Wind turbines look awesome.
Fatty1
EMoShunz
Posted 7:57 AM 11/12/07
there are less obtuse looking options I am sure they are looking at. but either way, if the UK does it, it will help push the other western countries to as well.
EMoShunz