Phones
Verizon Says It Will Open Network to "Any Apps, Any Device" in 2008
Posted by Wilson Rothman at 12:22 AM on November 28, 2007
In a startling announcement, Verizon Wireless pledged today to offer its network to "wireless devices, software and applications not offered by the company". We're a bit surprised, given the network protectionism that Verizon is known for. According to the release, Lowell McAdam, Verizon Wireless president and chief executive officer, didn't say this was a change of tactic, but rather an enhancement of service offerings "for customers looking for a different wireless experience." As you'd expect, there seems to be a small catch.
In early 2008, the company will publish the technical standards the development community will need to design products to interface with the Verizon Wireless network. Any device that meets the minimum technical standard will be activated on the network. Devices will be tested and approved in a $20 million state-of-the-art testing lab which received an additional investment this year to gear up for the anticipated new demand. Any application the customer chooses will be allowed on these devices.So, it's not like you can build your own phone in the basement, then call VZW to apply service. But the press release does mention a conference Verizon will host, "to explain the standards and get input from the development community".
We have so many questions—Why is Verizon doing this now? Who is the target manufacturer for these "BYO" phones?—that we'll be hopping on a call soon to hopefully get to the bottom of it. [Verizon Wireless]

Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
Noobs-R-Us
Posted 2:55 PM 27/11/07
About time one of the carriers admitted that they're just a "dumb pipe" company. 0 value add.
Noobs-R-Us
Wilson Rothman
Posted 2:47 PM 27/11/07
@Y2KGTP: As authoritative as that five-year plan sounds coming from the mighty USA Today, Apple's Greg Joswiak told me personally that Apple has never confirmed such a deal.
Wilson Rothman
Y2KGTP
Posted 1:38 PM 27/11/07
@ryetronics:
Yeap....5 year deal
[www.usatoday.com]
Y2KGTP
wwalkersd
Posted 12:11 PM 27/11/07
It's about time. Back when wireless data services (1X-RTT and earlier) were being defined, it was clear to us developers that the wireless carriers needed to become ISPs, in effect. We kept telling them that what customers wanted from them was a "bit pipe" to connect to the internet. Verizon clearly chose the "AOL/Compuserve" ISP model, where the ISP provides the software and all the content. One has only to look at AOL today to realize how dead that model is. The nails are set in the coffin lid, waiting only to be hammered home. And finally, finally, Verizon is realizing they're suffering from the same ailment.
At least, that's what it looks like to me. It might just be the 700 MHz auction thing mentioned above.
wwalkersd
ryetronics
Posted 11:41 AM 27/11/07
Isn't the CDMA iphone argument a little ridiculous? AT&T signed a, what, 5 year exclusivity deal with Apple? Get over it people. You'll have to move to AT&T to get the iphone, or wait another 4 years when something better will be out.
ryetronics
frigg
Posted 11:03 AM 27/11/07
Easy answer: upcoming FCC auction for 700 MHz beachfront spectrum.
I've heard that Google has employed some game theorists, and I'm sure Verizon is doing the same thing. This recent maneuvering is part of an ongoing chess match being played out to influence the nature and outcome of this game-changing broadband auction.
frigg
bueller929
Posted 10:45 AM 27/11/07
Not sure why everyone is surprised about the EVDO network allowing use as a modem. It's been out for over a year. As SMARTTART62 said, all you need is a USB cable and add the tethering feature. Obviously runs off the phone signal, so anywhere you have signal you can connect your laptop to the internet.
Also, they don't cap you at 5MB, I've got 20MB of data.
bueller929
jamar0303
Posted 10:39 AM 27/11/07
...I don't see how this is an improvement, especially with that "testing" bit. Customers with their cool Korean phones probably still won't be able to activate them on the network because Verizon will find some way tp prevent or drag out testing of those phones.
jamar0303
pete
Posted 10:39 AM 27/11/07
And now I'm praying even harder for Helio to go under.
pete
satan gave me a taco
Posted 10:35 AM 27/11/07
SHORTCUT MENU
satan gave me a taco
digiprod
Posted 10:29 AM 27/11/07
I fail to see what is so starling so far. They never allowed you to load apps on VZ phones, they did not join Google with the Android project, they limit bandwidth and recently had to compensate users millions to pay them back for cutting them off due to bandwidth usage when they told them it was unlimited when it clearly was not.
With all the customers they are losing to the iPhone and soon Google this is no real surprise that they put out the PR that basically says nothing that customers should have already had when they purchased a broadband connection on their sell network. Actions speak louder than words. Why wait until 2008? Why not now.
Sounds a lot like the HD announcement on FiOS TV, were they promise more HD content next year, while their competitors are killing them with HD content now. Seems they make these annoucements to try to keep customers that are looking to bolt!
digiprod
Joseph
Posted 10:24 AM 27/11/07
@JRo: That and the 2 year mutual exclusivity deal with AT&T.
Joseph
tande
Posted 10:23 AM 27/11/07
@pete: Now those would be more reasonable then everyone asking about the iphone.
Sprint has already said that they'll unlock their phones so I'd imagine that any sprint phone can be made to work when this is all said an done.
The ocean would probably depend on helio but I imagine when they realize that they'll be able to start selling their devices at a premium to take advantage of this that too would just be a matter of time.
tande
TheKidMillz
Posted 10:20 AM 27/11/07
I hope this means Verizon is joining the OHA...The OHA website says they will be deploying handsets running Android by the second half of 08 as well
CDMA HTC/gPhone????
TheKidMillz
image18301
Posted 10:18 AM 27/11/07
Just a thought: Does Apple have an agreement with AT&T for the iphone solely, or for ANY cell phone it may produce in the future? Cause if it's only for the iphone...
image18301
ImTheKing
Posted 10:14 AM 27/11/07
iphone????
ImTheKing
pete
Posted 10:10 AM 27/11/07
Hello - can I get a Helio Ocean activated on Verizon now?
How about a Sprint HTC Touch?
Need to clarify these points...
pete
eleazar
Posted 10:05 AM 27/11/07
I don't understand how them having to test the phones first is a catch. That seems entirely normal. Now, if they take 1.5 years to test each phone, then I would agree.
eleazar
Razta
Posted 9:58 AM 27/11/07
@SwatLax: Its a nice phone too. I just bought 4 of them. One downside to the Centro vs. the Treo. Battery life.
Razta
Noobs-R-Us
Posted 9:46 AM 27/11/07
iPhone??????
Noobs-R-Us
RemmingtonShowdown
Posted 9:45 AM 27/11/07
Currently every phone manufacturer save Apple has a device on Verizon's network. The bit about opening up their pipeline to any device seems a bit more style than substance. As for the any app part... well it seems it's an approach that mirrors Apple's with the SDK and iPhone. Verizon will allow your app to run on thir network so long as they approve it. So really Verizon is opening up their sandbox for limited playing.
In the end I do applaud Verizon as this is at least the first step in modernizing the American telecom market.
RemmingtonShowdown
jared51182
Posted 9:35 AM 27/11/07
iphone??????
jared51182
nightsky
Posted 9:34 AM 27/11/07
If the big V actually did this, and allowed for EVDO modems. they could blow Wimax out of the water, so to speak. I could really use my laptop almost anywhere. I hate my phones browser. Mippin makes it better, but it is still crap, and I cant look at my home computer on my phone. I would love to be able to sit in the park and work, and get files off of my home computer.
nightsky
sumocat
Posted 9:32 AM 27/11/07
@bitbass: I think you're on the right track. Verizon spends a lot of effort testing devices and figuring out what features to cripple, just so they can sell phones at subsidized prices. By opening their network, they pass the burden of meeting their standards (and limitations) on to the device makers and can bring in customers with their own unsubsidized phones.
sumocat
Falconfire
Posted 9:24 AM 27/11/07
Oh thank fucking god. Does this mean Verizon I can get yoru crippled crappy ass software off my phone and use the Slvr like every other carrier can?
Falconfire
smarttart62
Posted 9:22 AM 27/11/07
@nightsky:
By connecting up a Verizon phone to your computer (via bluetooth or USB) and using Qualcomm software, you can change a small value that will allow tethering on your phone for free. However, by doing so you void your agreement with Verizon, and people have been caught using this method.
Back to the issue on hand, I'm really excited for this. If everything goes well then I'll finally be able to get some free apps for my cell (like Opera for example). I'd love for the iPhone to come to Verizon, but that's unlikely as was pointed out in prior comments.
smarttart62
Windhawk
Posted 9:22 AM 27/11/07
@nightsky: Except for the fact that VZW purposely cripples the Blackberrys they sell (possibly so as to not eat into their sales of PC Card wireless cards) according to the Blackberry advertisements the Blackberrys can indeed work as BlueTooth to EVDO modems.
The 7130 supports DUN, maybe all we need to do is pay Verizon an additional fee for them to unlock that functionality?
Windhawk
MacBandit
Posted 9:17 AM 27/11/07
I could care less about this new open network for new hardware Verizon is pitching what interests me in the above statement is their opening their network to software. Does this mean we'll be able to install 3rd party apps on our current phones?
MacBandit
bitbass
Posted 9:17 AM 27/11/07
Perhaps this is Vz acknowledging that it takes them a full year to get out last years Windows Mobile device. They've always been abysmally slow to release new phones that aren't gimicky.
Then again, it is Vz we're talking about here. I'm sure they'll find a way to make this very unattractive to anyone that would care.
bitbass
mwalker05
Posted 9:16 AM 27/11/07
im pretty sure apple and at&t would both have to agree in order for verizon to be able to legally support them to begin with. which will never happen.
mwalker05
MacBandit
Posted 9:15 AM 27/11/07
@nightsky:
It's not a hack it'a feature most phones have.
MacBandit
SwatLax
Posted 9:10 AM 27/11/07
I just want the Centro to come to Verizon.
SwatLax
Y2KGTP
Posted 9:06 AM 27/11/07
@pastrychef:
I could deal with that....it's just a cellphone..
Y2KGTP
nightsky
Posted 9:02 AM 27/11/07
Side thread here. I have seen some hack an EVDO phone to act as a laptop modem, esp the LG Chocolate. Has anyone here done this on the V network?
nightsky
bmoctta
Posted 9:01 AM 27/11/07
I don't see Steve opening the iphone. I see this as VZW trying to be the first one in the industry in bed with google and the open handset alliance project. Their way of quickly trying to recover what they lost to the iphone...
bmoctta
JRo
Posted 8:52 AM 27/11/07
Blachole is right. The only way that iPhone is going to work on VZW is if Apple decides to manufacture a CDMA version of the iPhone.
I guess the only other option would involve Verizon somehow leveraging off Vodaphone's GSM network, but I doubt they're switching their entire infrastructure at this point. We're talking billions of dollars for VZW to get that done.
JRo
pastrychef
Posted 8:50 AM 27/11/07
Too bad they still cap their users to 5GB/month.
pastrychef
yoshi
Posted 8:44 AM 27/11/07
This could lead to developers opening the iPhone to operate on Verizon's network.
Can and will Verizon handle all "activations?"
That's the question I want to know.
yoshi
Windhawk
Posted 8:44 AM 27/11/07
Now we just need to get EVDO into the iPhone.
Windhawk
blachole
Posted 8:44 AM 27/11/07
How is the iPhone going to work on VZ when its a whole different network (GSM vs. CDMA)? Is VZ looking to build a CDMA/GSM network?
blachole
sryidc
Posted 8:35 AM 27/11/07
iphone????
sryidc
fostina1
Posted 8:34 AM 27/11/07
iphone???
fostina1
QAdam
Posted 8:31 AM 27/11/07
FINALLY>>>>FINALLY>>>>FINALLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
QAdam
keepr
Posted 4:54 PM 27/11/07
[Vice President]
OMG!
We are loosing market share!
[President]
What do they want?!?
[Vice President]
Lower prices, better technology, and friendly customer service reps! Oh and they said something about an open network..
[President]
Open Network? That doesn't sound so bad lets do that one.
keepr
Prolific Programmer
Posted 10:21 PM 27/11/07
@RemmingtonShowdown: The world's largest handset maker, Nokia has no phones on Verizon's network -- they don't do CDMA.
Prolific Programmer
WTF-STFU
Posted 10:59 PM 27/11/07
LMFAO!!! That picture with the "Can you hear me know?" is hysterical.
WTF-STFU
ndnr
Posted 12:21 AM 28/11/07
Verizon is sooooooooo afraid of Google.
ndnr
ninjatales
Posted 2:26 AM 28/11/07
Silly kids. T-Mobile and AT&T had this feature a long time ago. Just get any GSM phone running on the same frequencies (or any quad-band phone) we use here, pop in your SIM CARD and you can hear your grandma over the phone.
As for the iPhone, I'm not sure how a GSM phone could run on a CDMA network.
ninjatales