Gadgets
Amazon Kindle Real-Life Review (Verdict: Lightweight, Long Lasting and Easy to Grip... In Bed)
Posted by Wilson Rothman at 5:00 AM on November 24, 2007
It's dumb to test the Amazon Kindle by sitting at a desk, pressing a lot of buttons. The real judgment as to its usefulness has to come after experiencing it throughout the week in three key real-life reading scenarios:
• In the bedroom
• On an aeroplane
• Atop the porcelain throne (yes, I'm talking about the toilet)
Join us as we take you where we don't like to take too many strangers, and experience the real-life Kindle review:
I understand the Kindle. Book reading is always a one-on-one activity, and there is more or less only one way to experience a book—from a rectangular object in your hand. An e-book reader that's PC-free, connected directly to the book source, is even smarter than an MP3 player or phone that's connected to a music store, because music ends up all over the place, while books will always stay in your lap.
People bitch about a lack of Wi-Fi, but as a fan of wide-area wireless, I think Sprint's EV-DO was a good way to go, because it's available in more places. And as far as the lack of backlight, I am inclined to believe the messaging from both Amazon and Sony, that E-Ink is easier on the eyes than anything backlit, and that long battery life is more important. I used the Kindle regularly without charging for four days straight before it completely crapped out just this morning.
As for the criticism about document and e-book format compatibility, I suspect these problems will work themselves out over time, as the Kindle's Linux platform is surely easy to enhance through software. At any rate, you already know many of the issues, so there's no point rehashing them here, especially when much of it is a matter of personal preference.
No, none of these theoretical concerns were in my mind as I read using the Kindle this week, but that's not to say I didn't uncover some issues. Here's what I discovered this week while reading a book on Kindle—Heat by Bill Buford— that I was already halfway through in its old-world hardcover paper form:
In Bed:
• Next Page buttons on both sides mean tremendous comfort in bed. No matter which hand you are holding the Kindle in, you can easily turn the page, and if you have it sitting on the bed next to you, you can even tap the large button on the right with a finger or your elbow.
• Since it's much larger than a hardcover or even a trade paperback, you can hold it without tiring out your arm, or needing to use your leg to prop it up.
• Normally when reading in bed, you have to shift positions when you turn the page, especially when at the beginning or end of a large book. Since the Kindle only displays one page at a time, and doesn't have a shifting weight of pages from one side to the other, you can pick a position and stick to it.
• I have a lamp next to my bed for reading old-school printed books; it works just as well with Kindle.
In the Air:
• EV-DO isn't available everywhere, or even at all airports. The one I flew out of only provided a paltry 1X signal, and it took me about five minutes to download the current issue of The Atlantic Monthly.
• Speaking of The Atlantic, text-heavy weeklies and monthlies really are the target. Newspapers are a problem, because the editions that appear on Kindle are already outdated by their own websites, so newshounds would get frustrated. The lineup of magazines needs to grow, though. I won't be happy until The Economist and The New Yorker appear on the menu. (I may come from the Great Red State of Indiana, but I prefer my current events smart and a little left-leaning. But while we're at it, Amazon, a Guns N' Ammo Kindle Edition might be nice too.)
• Once aboard, FAA regulation required that I not use the Kindle at takeoff and landing. Though obvious, this pissed me off because that's when I always read on planes, before iPod time kicks in and I have the option of a movie.
• There's a handy switch to shut off the cellular data modem, and prove to the flight attendants you're no rule-breaker.
• The onboard Oxford New American Dictionary is good but not great with proper nouns. It picked up "Romanesque" but did not get "Florentine," for instance. And Wikipedia, which would have more elaborate data on both, is of no use when you're airborne.
• Private reading lights have been part of the airplane experience since time immemorial. No backlighting on e-book readers means this glorious tradition will continue.
On the Toilet:
• Friction rubber grip makes it okay to set down on the side of your sink or back of toilet without it slipping. We have a porcelain pedestal sink in one bathroom that anything without a grip would slide off of—and smash on the floor.
• Buttons on both sides of the Kindle mean that it's sometimes hard to grip it securely and not press a button. I were to hypothetically make a mad dash to the toilet, Kindle in hand, I would risk flipping a bunch of pages on the way and losing my place.
Other usage discoveries:
• As I mentioned, the battery lasted four full days of regular use, mostly with the EV-DO switch turned on. (It probably would have run much longer if I had left it off.) When your battery gets low, you get the error message below, but shutting down EV-DO that late in the game does nothing to conserve battery life, which died 5 minutes after I saw this. Charging is quick though—juice it for 15 or 20 minutes and it's good to go for a while.
• I never turned the thing off, either: when you leave it alone for a few minutes, it turns to a keylock screen with a pretty picture or a promotional tip (see gallery below—I've shot 8 so far, but there are tons of 'em). You click and hold the Alt and font-size buttons to release it.
• I will never understand the magical technology behind the shiny LCD bar on the right. It is sooo pretty I sometimes do stuff just to watch it jump around. Very unique in this copycat-heavy CE universe.
• The leather case is good for protecting and carrying around without hitting buttons (see "On the Toilet"), but it is totally lame when you are trying to read. Slip it out and hide the case until you are ready to move again.
• The Highlight clipping tool is too primitive to be cool. You can only highlight a line at a time, so your clippings, particularly when viewed by themselves, look ugly and confusing. Anything you highlight is automatically saved in My Clippings, where all of your Clippings, from all publications, are lumped together.
• In natural settings, I never used the web browser. I surf the web a-plenty in my daily life, and while I'm reading, I'm just not thinking about dot coms.
• The keyboard does have a bit of a lag, as we reported, but that's not too problematic. My biggest problem is the spacebar, hidden on the left side. Little known trivia: As it turns out, I SPACE with my right hand.
• Footnotes are weird. I was reading a David Foster Wallace piece that, like most of his work, was riddled with footnotes, and each time I had to click it to see the note, which could get annoying. Same goes for Colbert's book I Am America.
• My wife likes it. OK, so you weren't curious about that, maybe, but she's a voracious reader and she generally turns her nose up at most of the gadgets that arrives at our doorstep. With the Kindle, though, she got excited. She picked it up and started reading the Atlantic Monthly, saying how "amazing" it was that Amazon got the magazine's formatting right, and how pleasant the E-Ink was to read.
• In the end, looks mattered least of all. Even though my wife thinks it looks like a "medical device," it was not a turn off. I think people underestimate its wedgey coolness, while overestimating the impact that would have. Bezos said you don't look at the thing, you look at the book within—maybe he was anticipating a hazing from the Style Police, but I think he's right. I just read my damn book.
My verdict is that a connected e-book reader was what the world needed, and as long as Amazon's library expands to encompass every book I want to read, I see no reason why I should be upset that I have to buy it from them. Yes, $US399 is expensive, but that's likely to drop, and the more market-resistant $9.99 book price hits a Jobsian sweet spot.
Having lived with the Kindle, I can say that it serves most of my immediate reading needs. As a guy who enjoys amassing a vast library of books and displaying them in bookcases, I am a little frightened of the future, but inevitability is the name of the game, and fear of change isn't a good enough excuse. Will I continue to buy books or will I jump into Amazon book buying mode? That remains to be seen, but you, o early adopter, should not share my fears. The Kindle is a quality invention, and I can see why the first batch sold out so fast.









Comments (AU Comments · US Comments)
There are currently no AU comments for this post.
zgecko
Posted 11:58 PM 23/11/07
Just like ERRATAPAGE said, these things really, REALLY, need a backlight. I can't understand why more people aren't getting all uptight about this.
I love to read in bed, and my wife is very sensitive to book lights. I've tried at least six different kinds of book lights and they all keep her awake. The only thing that ever worked was my old Treo 650, since I could download ebooks (from the library) and watch them with the backlight turned quite low. I found it to be very legible in a dark room, and my wife could sleep soundly.
If the Amazon or Sony reader had a dimmable backlight, I would buy one immediately, but until then, no deal.
zgecko
xxsk84life69
Posted 10:38 PM 23/11/07
Verdict:"That's what she said"
xxsk84life69
erratapage
Posted 8:50 PM 23/11/07
Question: What advantage does this product have over my mobipocket reader on my blackberry (except for availability of books)?
My blackberry is back lit, the font is adjustable, and the wheel makes it fairly easy to use.
I am a voracious reader (4-6 books a week). About half of the books I read are ebooks. The rest are from a book rental service. I buy maybe one book a month, these days.
If the screen were backlit and the titles a little cheaper, I would consider the Kindle. I would crave the Kindle if it looked nicer. I don't get why it's ugly.
erratapage
ThriftyTechie
Posted 8:11 PM 23/11/07
@odysseus:
The Economist is badly misunderstood. They are very liberal on most social issues: abortion, stem-cell research, diversity, etc. On some issues they are reaaly far left; they more or less advocate legalized prostitution and drug trade (and I don't mean pharmaceuticals)
But back to the matter at hand...
If the Kindle was $100 or $150 OR had more utility (a color screen, for example), it would be a home run.
As it stands now, it would be hard to convince most people to buy a kindle instead of a book. Or instead of 20 books, for that matter....
ThriftyTechie
bobdobbs
Posted 7:47 PM 23/11/07
Sorry, Mr. Bezos, I'm gadget-saturated.
bobdobbs
Joe Manning
Posted 7:40 PM 23/11/07
bookshelves are over rated. who likes yanking their head sideways to find stuff? I hate book stores.
Joe Manning
Canoehead
Posted 7:21 PM 23/11/07
Too expensive for a product where you also have to spend siginifcant sums for content.
Canoehead
Marty_MacFly
Posted 7:19 PM 23/11/07
"Bezos said you don't look at the thing, you look at the book within..."
So even Jeff Bezos himself recognizes the ugliness.
Marty_MacFly
NeoPoliticus
Posted 6:22 PM 23/11/07
Apple will do it right.
NeoPoliticus
popstand
Posted 6:21 PM 23/11/07
That footnote mechanism sounds alright actually. Most of David Foster Wallace's footnotes are actually endnotes, meaning you have to flip all the way to the back of the book to read them. I'd prefer a way to just bring them up quickly.
popstand
ndonahue
Posted 5:42 PM 23/11/07
Hmmm, let's see. $400+ $10/title for at best a transitional technology that still can't beat the nearly perfect interface of a printed book.
The only ones who seem to benefit from a Kindle are the publishers and distributors (Amazon) who get Kindle users to pay for the companies to reduce their marginal unit costs to zero.
I think we'll see substantial adoption when either a) Amazon starts giving them away for free, or b) the product provides a substantially better interface than a paperback.
ndonahue
Wilson Rothman
Posted 4:20 PM 23/11/07
@odysseus: Obviously you didn't grow up in Indiana.
Wilson Rothman
Wilson Rothman
Posted 4:19 PM 23/11/07
@designguybrown: One thing that they do for Kindle owners is give them single-chapter free samples. I've downloaded a few, and though they still may not provide the motivation you need, you could technically fill this baby up with lit samples and never pay a penny.
Wilson Rothman
Wilson Rothman
Posted 4:17 PM 23/11/07
@wbremner: Sorry, I should have got that out of the way quickly—I am very impressed with the paper-like quality, and find that it's so easy to read that I keep the font size down, to keep more words on each page. My wife agrees, and I have added that to the review where I talk about her impressions.
Wilson Rothman
fupjack
Posted 4:05 PM 23/11/07
I second the comment about the Economist - that's 100+ pages of dense text arriving every damn week, on top of whatever else I read. Having it it delayed by the ost office from Saturday to Monday can make it hard to finish one before the next arrives; just a year of the Economist is a quarter of the cost of one of these devices.
If it arrived automagically the same time every week, in a single format I could hold onto that weighed (about) as much as the paper form - great! And that form could hold more books - great!
I really think of this thing more as a magazine/newspaper physical replacement. It's better than sitting at a PC.
It just needs more content that I specifically want - if there were more small press or cartoonists producing material, I'd be all for it, even if I had to subscribe. I mean, hell, I mostly just get the newspaper for cartoons these days.
fupjack
tin
Posted 3:50 PM 23/11/07
and ugly
tin
Pope John Peeps II
Posted 3:48 PM 23/11/07
I'm only bothered by the ugly plastic that will invariably yellow as the years go by. Seriously. Make them to last. Apple may be killing the "burnished aluminum" look to eight kinds of death, but at least it lasts.
Also, is there some way in which we can make this benefit local bookstores? If, for example, we can browse local bookstores for books, and then buy our online wares with a product key that lets the supplier know where we saw the thing. If people just buy online, no one's ever going to browse locally anymore.
Pope John Peeps II
odysseus
Posted 3:20 PM 23/11/07
The Economist? Slightly left-wing??? Compared to Attila the Hun, maybe...
odysseus
Improbable
Posted 3:12 PM 23/11/07
My biggest concern, after the price, is the contrast of the screen. I absolutely love the idea of the e-ink display. Reading on a CRT or LCD is just too hard for me to do for more than ten minutes at a time, but the background on the current e-readers is too dark for me.
If Amazon could lower the price, increase screen contrast, and straighten out the format compatibility, I'd be all over it. The physical appearance doesn't bother me a bit.
Improbable
mastercha
Posted 2:44 PM 23/11/07
What I think will eventually lead me to ebooks is when they are bundled with paper books. Buy from Amazon, B&N, Borders, whoever and get a code for the ebook version, as well. That way, when I am home, I can use my paper books and when I am in the Law Library or in the Coffee Shop studying/reading/relaxing, I can bring my eBooks.
However, I will be far more impressed when textbooks become available for the Kindle or Sony reader. I am sick of carrying my Law books around everywhere and I would love something with the convenience of the Kindle to handle textbooks. That would be worth the price premium for me.
A man can dream...
mastercha
chueychihuahua
Posted 2:42 PM 23/11/07
I'll wait until the screen tech gets better. I can read a normal book in dim light with no strain but could feel a bit of strain with the sony 505 which I think has the exact same screen as the kindle.. Black on light gray. It's a real cool gadget though.
chueychihuahua
designguybrown
Posted 2:39 PM 23/11/07
My biggest concern is the price of the books - $9.99 or thereabouts... i don't know about other people but...
I hate to buy (or at least pay a lot for) things that I don't know whether i'll like or not. ((targeting impulsive buyers and over-pricing 'new' items is the devil's work - 'devil' meant in a bad way)) -- however...
I really like to buy 'nice' deluxe versions of things that I really like/ have profoundly impacted me, etc., and can, of course, display on my bookshelf, etc.
The ideal solution?? - pay $0.99 for the first four chapters, then an additional $4.00 for the rest of the ebook, then have the opportunity to apply that $4,99 to the 'tree-corpse' version at the site. Hasn't anyone (media distributor) learned anything from iTunes? ((Or are they just in denial that this is the only business-model that a wise, wide audience will accept - and that we refuse to be hosed in to overpaying for things that can be distributed at next-to-nothing -- stop trying to get rich media distributors!))
I would be willing to bet that the huge amount of 'hits' from allowing the $0.99 preview would lead to way more $4.99 purchases and far more tree-corpse 'deluxes' to get passed around -- which means a lot more people get exposed to a lot more reading which means selling more of it all, and so on -- unfortunately, at that point, i suppose, the media distributors, can, i guess get a little bit rich.
designguybrown
anwill
Posted 2:30 PM 23/11/07
This thing scares me. I'm the sort of person who loves all new technology. I bought the iPhone the day it came out, I love my Apple TV an my Wii and my XBOX. But this scares me. It's the first time I've felt like a new piece of technology will take away something I love, which is the stack of books on my bookshelf. I've never had this experience before, and I guess it's something I'll have to get used to. I'm so torn by my interest in the kindle and my love of actual books...
anwill
rlreif
Posted 2:29 PM 23/11/07
Amazon needs to open this store up to other devices...
i also like this and think this is the future, but amazon should stick to the content and allow others to make the hardware... the sprint evdo is great if you live in the US and i can see how a lot of people would want only that... others would want wifi... different screens, etc...
rlreif
MagnoliaBoy
Posted 2:08 PM 23/11/07
I still think it's ugly\boring. But it does seem extremely useful, though a little lacking. Not happy about the DRM either. (thought piloting a none DRM music store might apply to books as well) I reverse my opinion to "Cool, but wait for second gen". Will Apple try to compete?
MagnoliaBoy
geschmidtt
Posted 1:56 PM 23/11/07
I think this is a killer app. Period!
geschmidtt
fpn1010
Posted 1:43 PM 23/11/07
Ditto... I get it, and I want it. I like the way it looks. Very simple... a very matter-of-fact device.
fpn1010
Aubin
Posted 1:32 PM 23/11/07
""
Except, you know, everywhere else in the World. Wireless, on the other hand, is available in almost every coffee shop, airport and university campus and isn't restricted by geography.
Aubin
Rh1n0
Posted 1:17 PM 23/11/07
I totally get this device, and want one. This is the future people, it's inevitable. The Kindle or something like it will succeed and Amazon has a better chance than most at pulling it off. That said... I want it in BLACK.
Rh1n0
wbremner
Posted 1:14 PM 23/11/07
Although you addressed some interesting aspects, the questions I'm most interested in weren't answered:
How does the text quality compare with traditional books? Are the letters / words as easy on the eye as typeset / printed ones?
wbremner
ComicDork
Posted 1:14 PM 23/11/07
Well I admit I'm a bit more impressed after reading this review. I want an eBook device more than just about anything (besides a 160GB iPod Touch), but... this thing just seems to be mess.
I'm not going to be able to move on it until I can get my grubby hands on it and play with it a bit. Not giving Bezos $400 without really touching it first. Amazon really needs a brick & mortar partner to make this truly successful.
I just don't know why all designers just don't say "What Would Apple Do?" when they build this stuff.
Again, thanks for the review... we'll see what happens.
Again, thanks for the review.
ComicDork
nincompoop
Posted 1:26 AM 24/11/07
Reminds me of a Star Trek episode where a member of the crew, (Kirk, not sure - correct me if I'm wrong), obtains increased mental powers and is seen flipping faster and faster through a device just like this. Science fiction turned science fact. Now where is my Hovver Car?
nincompoop
GregH
Posted 8:26 AM 24/11/07
Agreed about the contrast issue; background is still too grey. I know E-Ink is working on screens with higher contrast, so the technology is getting there.
Regarding price; if and when the technology catches on, the price of these things will drop.
Regarding backlit screens; focussing on large amounts of small text for hours on end on a backlit screen is not enjoyable for most folks. That's the whole point behind the technology. Having said that, I do agree that it would be nice to have dimmable backlight for cases where ambient light is unavailable.
I am a heavy reader too, and I am pretty excited about where this technology is going. I travel a lot for work, and it would be sweet to have a number of books on hand without the bulk of paper.
GregH
aidan_cage
Posted 9:26 AM 24/11/07
I want to read media that I've already accumulated on my computer (comics in .CBR format, Gutenberg.org titles), and I want to be able to listen to audio of the books purchased (if I'm travelling, but want to continue in the story). I would love to integrate the ideas of the iPod into the device, so that I could load my music into a huge hard drive and select songs via coverflowesque interfaces. Why not listen to Rachmaninoff while reading Dostoevsky? In any case, this technology could/should be blown wide open to freedom.
aidan_cage
takemetoyourtoaster
Posted 9:18 AM 24/11/07
I really hopw apple doesnt compete i would really like it if the next product they release ISN'T an ebook reader
takemetoyourtoaster
girly
Posted 12:50 PM 24/11/07
I wonder what the reader would look like under a blacklight after taking it to the bathroom.
I never could figure out how people sit in the bathroom long enough to read...the only time I would be in there that long, I'd probably be too sick to read.
girly
conglomerate
Posted 12:44 PM 24/11/07
i guess one could read black and white comics on it with ease? the walking dead maybe?
conglomerate
AdmNaismith
Posted 2:19 PM 24/11/07
Bean books has it right. when you buy one of their hardcovers, you get a disk with the e-version of the novel and a bunch of other stuff.
I would settle for getting the e-version of any book I physically buy. That way I have a something to read and put on my bookshelf, and I also something to put in my Palm to take with me and read when I am out and about.
This reader seems a good as anything, despite the bizarro downloading and DRM hoops the reader jumps through.
I'm not sure how Baen deals with DRM, but they are on the forefront of giving stuff to readers to get them interested in everything else Bean has to offer.
AdmNaismith
senorbelly
Posted 3:20 PM 24/11/07
The typography looks horsey as hell, like a large print edition. It's a book: can we talk about readability, please?
The UI is cluttered as well. Not even my DS has globally persistent battery level/signal strength indicators--why should a book?
senorbelly
frigg
Posted 2:22 PM 24/11/07
@Wilson Rothman: Did you really find it as easy to read as a book? That's the biggest complaint I've heard, that it doesn't actually replicate a printed page. Maybe that criticism is unfounded, but I wonder how you'd feel reading with this thing after 50 books, not just one or two.
Beyond screen resolution, there's just something about it that seems bloodless and antiseptic, making reading a joyless chore rather than a warm, cozy and, when scanning newspapers and magazines, efficient pleasure. If you were on a hammock in Hawaii, would you rather read from dead tree pulp or a Kindle?
Also, does it not bother you that the Kindle communicates every page you've read, every highlight you've made, and every comment you've written into it back to Amazon? Shouldn't reading patterns and annotations be exempt from monitoring and non-local storage (unless chosen)? As I understand it, there is no opt-out for Amazon to regularly send your reading habits, highlights and annotations back to the mothership.
As for selling out, I'm not surprised. Amazon is pimping the kindle on virtually every page of their site.
I don't mean to sound cynical. I'm all for electronic readers. I guess I just see the Kindle as a harbinger (or complement at best) rather than replacement for slaughtered trees in its current incarnation.
frigg
stonecoldcleric
Posted 9:52 PM 24/11/07
pretty cool other than the fact that he's laying in bed with a kkk member.
stonecoldcleric
BigSlide
Posted 1:09 PM 25/11/07
I'd be all over this if Amazon offered a subscription service for books instead of paying for each one. Since I like to have a tangible book to put on a bookshelf or read by the fire, the only thing I would do with this is read blogs/newspapers/magazines and download a book periodically if I needed it immediately or wanted to research/reference something. I figure with all of the subscription music sites, 29.95 a month for unlimited - but not permanent - downloads would do the trick for most people.
BigSlide
jrghoull
Posted 2:06 PM 25/11/07
i'm gonna be curious as to how well the XO-1's e-book reader feature compares to this.
gizmodo, if u guys are reading this, please do a comparison okay? i'd love to know the results of such a study.
jrghoull
alin0steglinski
Posted 2:51 PM 25/11/07
meh just about everything i have looks like a medical device... my laptop IS a medical device, my health insurance paid for it as augmentative alternative communications... my powerchair which arrives around christmas, well... ok... thats not gonna look much like a medical device... especially because its gonna have [bodypoint.com] straps on there, those are hot!!!
alin0steglinski
side
Posted 3:32 AM 26/11/07
@WILSON ROTHMAN, thank you for the excellent review! My parents (late 50's early 60's) are book hogs and have thousands of texts throughout their house (3 different rooms are "libraries"). They are somewhat gadget-literate so I just picked up two of these for them (as they would not share) for X-mas. If they give it a chance, I think they will take full advantage of it. I'll use them as guinea pigs before I buy one for myself. Great info in your review, nonetheless.
side
Buford T. Justice
Posted 11:17 AM 26/11/07
Incidentally, the way the segmented 'pointer/selection' display works is simple. It's a low-tech calculator style LCD. But rather than going from grey/green/white to black it goes from black to clear. Then, the backing is mirrored. You can see the segments/cells quite clearly. Whomever came up with that effect is a genius. It rocks. I'd LOVE to see more displays like that.
Buford T. Justice
Buford T. Justice
Posted 11:14 AM 26/11/07
@frigg:
The one area where Amazon screwed up and wasn't thinking was in device color. The display appears more gray because the mirror-LCD-indicator thingy to the left is 'whiter', as is the case. A black Kindle would fix that. I never thought the PRS-500 was 'grey' and it's the earlier gen screen that's not as good.
Make no mistake, if you focus on everything else, the screen looks a little grey. If you just read, it's great. It's *amazingly* readable. Any conditions you can read a book in, you can read this in. Also, everyone's bitching about the contrast but newsprint is FAR worse in that respect... and I don't see people complaining about the contrast of newspapers. As with anything else, proper lighting enhances readability but it works in non-ideal situations as well.
Buford T. Justice