<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese Plane Developed that Flies Close to the Waves</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/chinese_plane_developed_that_f/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/chinese_plane_developed_that_f/</link>
	<description>the Gadget Guide &#124; Technology and consumer electronics news and reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:23:20 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/chinese_plane_developed_that_f/comment-page-1/#comment-1448</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/chinese_plane_developed_that_f.html#comment-1448</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What a load of bull. Planes fly high to reduce drag so claiming to use half as much fuel is total crap. There have been more than just Russian planes designed like this, and this Chinese design looks like junk.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a load of bull. Planes fly high to reduce drag so claiming to use half as much fuel is total crap. There have been more than just Russian planes designed like this, and this Chinese design looks like junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Si C</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/chinese_plane_developed_that_f/comment-page-1/#comment-1447</link>
		<dc:creator>Si C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 04:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/chinese_plane_developed_that_f.html#comment-1447</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds exactly the same as the old Russian Ekranoplan...&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.gizmohighway.com/transport/ekranoplan.htm&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds exactly the same as the old Russian Ekranoplan&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.gizmohighway.com/transport/ekranoplan.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gizmohighway.com/transport/ekranoplan.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richo2153</title>
		<link>http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/chinese_plane_developed_that_f/comment-page-1/#comment-1446</link>
		<dc:creator>richo2153</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 03:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizmodo.com.au/2007/07/chinese_plane_developed_that_f.html#comment-1446</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;the russians did this years ago (and they were friggin huge planes), is there anything that the chinese wont steal and repackage as their own???&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the russians did this years ago (and they were friggin huge planes), is there anything that the chinese wont steal and repackage as their own???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
